gms | German Medical Science

22. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e. V.

06.03. - 09.03.2019, Heidelberg

Can pitch discrimination be detected by objective measures?

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • presenting/speaker Florian Keller - Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
  • Andreas Bahmer - Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e.V.. 22. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie. Heidelberg, 06.-09.03.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc167

doi: 10.3205/19dga167, urn:nbn:de:0183-19dga1674

Published: November 28, 2019

© 2019 Keller et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: Pitch discrimination tasks are usually measured by psychoacoustic tests. However, these tests are time consuming and often show a high variability in their results. Instead, an objective measure has the advantage that no active participation of the subject is required to determine certain hearing parameters. As an example ASSRs can be automatically detected in the EEG by statistical tests. Therefore, it may be preferable to detect pitch discrimination ability with objective methods.

Methods: An adaptive two alternative forced choice (2AFC) task and an ASSR measurement were designed. In both cases subjects have to listen to jittered sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) stimuli. The jitter is applied only to the modulation frequency such that one modulation cycle is presented.

Results: Small jitter can slightly enhance the pitch discrimination ability (just noticeable difference) of normal hearing subjects compared to a signal without jitter. Further increasing of the jitter deteriorates pitch discrimination ability. ASSR tests were not yet conducted.

Discussion and Conclusion: More subjects are needed to see whether the improvement of small jitter is robust. In the future, ASSR with jittered amplitude modulated signals will be compared to the psychoacoustic results. If the results of the AFC test and the ASSR recording are similar, the psychoacoustic test may be substituted by the objective measure.