gms | German Medical Science

GMS Journal for Medical Education

Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

ISSN 2366-5017

On the correlation between gratitude and resilience in medical students

article gratitude and resilience

Search Medline for

  • author Nicolai Hahn - Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Witten, Germany
  • author Patrick Brzoska - Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Health Services Research, Witten, Germany
  • corresponding author Claudia Kiessling - Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, Education of Personal and Interpersonal Competencies in Health Care, Witten, Germany

GMS J Med Educ 2024;41(1):Doc8

doi: 10.3205/zma001663, urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0016634

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/journals/zma/2024-41/zma001663.shtml

Received: May 3, 2023
Revised: August 20, 2023
Accepted: November 14, 2023
Published: February 15, 2024

© 2024 Hahn et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

Objective: Medical students’ health and resilience have increasingly been the subject of current research in recent years. A variety of interventions are recommended to strengthen resilience or its known or suspected influencing factors, although the literature shows that the evidence on the effectiveness of the interventions is inconsistent. The present study investigated whether gratitude is a direct protective factor for resilience in medical students or whether resilience factors (optimism, self-efficacy, social support) and stress mediate the effects of gratitude on resilience.

Methods: 90 medical students at Witten/Herdecke University took part in the study that determined their gratitude, resilience, optimism, self-efficacy, social support and stress levels using validated questionnaires (GQ-6, RS-25, LOT-R, SWE, F-SozU, PSS). Correlations were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients. In addition, a multivariate regression analysis and a path analysis were calculated to determine the direct and indirect effects of gratitude on resilience.

Results: Multivariate regression analysis showed that only optimism, social support and stress were significantly associated with resilience (B=0.48, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.66; B=0.23, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.44 and B=-0.02, 95% CI: -0.03, -0.001, respectively). The direct effect of gratitude on resilience was minimal and not significant in the path analysis. However, there was an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience (B=0.321; p<0.05). Mediation via the optimism variable was mainly responsible for this effect (indirect effect B=0.197; p<0.05).

Conclusion: This study shows that gratitude has only a minimal direct influence on resilience. However, results indicate that optimism as a mediating factor strengthens the resilience of medical students. Against this background, it may be useful to integrate interventions that promote an optimistic attitude into medical studies in order to strengthen the mental health of future doctors in the long term.

Keywords: gratitude, resilience, optimism, resilience factors, medical studies, mental health


1. Introduction and objectives

It has been known for decades that stress and strain during medical studies can lead to states of exhaustion and serious illnesses [1], [2], [3]. Medical students worldwide are, for example, more than twice as likely to suffer from depression or depressive symptoms compared to the general population [4], [5]. This also applies to medical students in Germany [6], [7]. Research findings also indicate that medical students are exposed to higher levels of psychological stress than students of other disciplines [8], [9], [10]. Further data shows that mental health deteriorates during medical studies and continues to decline on average when students enter professional life [11], [12], [13]. Physicians’ mental health usually does not stabilize with increasing professional experience, so that the prevalence of depression, stress and suicide is also higher in this group than in the general population [14], [15], [16]. It is also known that medical doctors’ mental health has a direct impact on patients’ health [17]. Therefore, it seems sensible to find ways to positively influence students’ mental health as early as during medical school. The concept of resilience could play a key role here. Resilience refers to the ability to successfully adapt to acute stress, trauma or chronic stress and to remain healthy despite negative stressors, such as stressful events [18], [19], [20]. Studies have shown that people with a high level of resilience are less depressed, fall ill less often and also recover more quickly after illness than people with a low level of resilience [18], [19], [21], [22], [23]. Resilience is considered to be something that can be learned, changed and trained throughout life [24], [25], based on the neuroplasticity of the human brain [26]. Against this background, interventions that can strengthen resilience are of particular interest, as they can make a lasting contribution to maintaining health. However, according to a Cochrane Review, interventions that aim to strengthen resilience show inconsistent evidence regarding their effectiveness [27]. On the other hand, promoting so-called resilience factors can have an effective influence on resilience [21], [24], [27]. These are psychological and social resources that have a positive effect on resilience [28]. They include, for example, the experience of positive emotions [29], optimism [24], hope [30], a sense of coherence [31], [32], self-efficacy [33], and social support [28]. Resilience factors in medical students have also been investigated in a number of studies [34], [35], [36]. These resilience factors are closely related to the concept of gratitude, as gratitude can have a positive influence on resilience factors [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. Gratitude has only been systematically investigated in medical-psychological research for around 20 years, and there are various definitions of gratitude [42]. For example, gratitude is conceptualized as an emotion, attitude, virtue or character trait [43]. One of the most widely used definitions and conceptualizations of gratitude comes from the American psychologists Michael McCullough and Robert A. Emmons. According to them, gratitude means perceiving the benevolence of another person or the environment and reacting to the resulting experience with positive emotions [37].

Assuming that resilience factors have a protective effect on resilience and that gratitude in turn has positive effects on these resilience factors, the present study aims to test the hypothesis that gratitude acts as a predictor of resilience in medical students and that the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy expectation and social support mediate indirect effects of gratitude on resilience. These resilience factors were selected because they are considered to be very well researched and also cover the spectrum of personal and interpersonal protective factors [24]. Although individual studies show that gratitude is a predictor of resilience [44], [45], it remains unclear whether the results are also transferable to other populations or whether the effect is mediated by other variables.


2. Methodology

2.1. Setting

We conducted a cross-sectional survey with medical students at Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H) in the preclinical phase of their studies (semesters 2-4). They were approached personally in seminars and asked to participate voluntarily via the internal e-mail distribution list. Of 176 possible participants, 94 took part in the study (response rate=53.4%). The survey took place in December 2019 and June 2020. The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Witten/Herdecke University (application number: 187/2019).

2.2. Instruments

Gratitude was measured using the German version of the Gratitude Questionnaire-6 (GQ-6) [37], [46], one of the most frequently used questionnaires to survey this construct [47]. It consists of six items, each with a seven-point response format ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Mean values were calculated (values between 1 and 7). The original scale has a high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82 [37].

The German translation of the RS-25 resilience scale by Wagnild & Young [48] was used to measure resilience [49]. The scale has shown to be a valid instrument for measuring resilience [50] and is the most widely used scale to assess resilience [21]. The instrument comprises 25 items, which are rated from 1 (No, I disagree) to 7 (Yes, I completely agree). The resilience scale is divided into two subscales: “personal competence” (17 items) and “acceptance of self and life” (8 items) [51]. The total scale was used in this study (mean values between 1 and 7). The internal consistency of the German Resilience Scale (RS-25) is high, with a Cronbach’s α=0.94 [49].

The German revised version of the Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) was used to measure the tendency towards dispositional optimism [52]. The Life Orientation Test contains a total of ten items: three positively formulated items in terms of optimism; three negatively formulated items in terms of pessimism and four filler items; all items have a seven-point response format ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (7). In the present study, mean values were calculated for the assessment of optimism (values between 1 and 7). The internal consistency of the German version of the Life Orientation Test is α=0.59 for the overall scale [52].

Self-efficacy expectations were measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) [53]. The questionnaire comprises ten items, which are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Mean values were calculated (values between 1 and 4). The scale for measuring SES shows an acceptable internal consistency of Cronbach’s α=0.78 [53].

The questionnaire on social support (F-SozU; [54]) was used to determine the level of social support. The short form of the questionnaire was used (K14; [55]), which consist of 14 items with a five-point response format from 1 (Does not apply) to 5 (Applies exactly) (mean values between 1 and 5). The short form (K14) of the questionnaire on social support shows very good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94 [55].

Stress was measured using the German translation of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [56], [57]. The questionnaire comprises ten questions, which are assessed by means of a five-point response format from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). The stress scale is divided into two subscales, the “helplessness” scale on the one hand and the “self-efficacy” scale on the other. In the present study, total values were calculated (values between 10 and 50). The internal consistency of the stress scale is high and lies between α=0.79 and 0.89 [57].

2.3. Data analysis

Individual questionnaires were first analyzed descriptively at the level of the overall scales. In addition, the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) for the study population was determined for each scale (see table 1 [Tab. 1]). To answer the research questions, a bivariate correlation (Pearson’s correlation coefficients) and a multivariate regression were calculated [58]. A path analysis was carried out to examine the indirect effects of gratitude on resilience [59], [60]. The significance level was set at α=0.05 for all analyses. Data analysis was performed using the IBM Statistics SPSS program version 26 and R/lavaan 0.6-3 [61]. Four questionnaires were incomplete or incorrectly filled in. These values were not included in the data analysis.


3. Results

3.1. Sample and descriptive statistics

The study included 90 medical students, of these 30 were male (33.3%) and 60 were female (66.7%). Descriptive statistics of the individual scales are shown in table 1 [Tab. 1]. Internal consistencies (Cronbach’s α) are high in each case and lie between 0.78 and 0.90. Only the “optimism” scale has an internal consistency of α=0.62, which can be considered comparatively low.

3.2. Correlation analysis

Bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients of the scales are shown in table 2 [Tab. 2]. Both gratitude and resilience correlated weakly to moderately with all other scales included in the study.

3.3. Multivariate regression analysis

A multivariate regression was performed to examine how strongly the variables gratitude, optimism, self-efficacy expectation, social support, and stress predict resilience in the study population. The model statistically significantly predicted resilience (F(5.84)=22.44, p<0.001, R2=0.572). The variables optimism, social support, and stress each contributed statistically significantly to the prediction (p<0.05). Gratitude showed only a minimal and non-significant effect on resilience. Optimism showed the strongest significant correlation with resilience (see table 3 [Tab. 3]). The inclusion of gender as a confounder showed no significant effect on resilience and had no effect on the correlation of the other variables.

3.4. Path analysis

A path analysis was also carried out to examine whether the effect of gratitude on resilience is overlaid by other variables and whether gratitude has an indirect effect on resilience via resilience factors or (reduced) stress. In this analysis, gratitude was selected as the independent variable, resilience as the dependent variable and optimism, self-efficacy expectation, social support and stress as mediators. The results showed that the indirect effect of gratitude on resilience – mediated by social support, optimism, stress and self-efficacy – (total indirect effect B=0.315) is statistically significant (p<0.05). It was found that the variable optimism was mainly responsible for this effect (indirect effect B=0.192, p<0.05). All other variables were not statistically significant. This result suggests an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience, mainly mediated by the variable optimism. Adjusting for gender had little overall impact on the effects (see figure 1 [Fig. 1]).


4. Discussion

4.1. Summary of the most important results

The aim of the study was to investigate whether gratitude has a direct effect on the resilience of medical students in the sense of an independent resilience factor or whether it has an indirect effect on resilience via other resilience factors such as optimism, self-efficacy expectations, social support, or stress. Previous studies have not sufficiently clarified this relationship, as the relationship between gratitude and resilience has been investigated and confirmed, but other resilience or confounding factors were not included in the respective studies [44], [45]. The present study showed a positive correlation between gratitude and resilience. The subsequent regression analysis showed that 57% of the total variance in resilience can be explained by the variables gratitude and the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy expectation, and social support as well as stress. Of these, optimism had the only significant and strongest direct influence on resilience. The direct effect of gratitude on resilience is negligible, which means that gratitude cannot be regarded as a direct predictor of resilience among the medical students in this study. Possible explanations for this result are that the few studies showing that gratitude is a predictor of resilience used a different resilience scale or did not take competing variables (resilience factors) into account [44], [45]. However, the path analysis showed that there is an indirect effect of gratitude on resilience and that the relevant parameter is again optimism. Optimism therefore has a direct effect on resilience on the one hand and an indirect effect on the other hand by mediating the effects of gratitude on resilience.

The results of the present study are consistent with findings from research into the relationship between optimism and resilience. An optimistic attitude has long been associated with other positive factors, such as physical and psychological well-being, lower levels of depression, and greater life satisfaction [62], [63], [64]. Both gratitude and resilience are closely related to optimism [65], [66]. In addition, optimism also appears to be a predictor of resilience [67], [68]. The present study now shows that this correlation can also be assumed for medical students.

The mean values of medical students for gratitude in this study are high. Studies in which students were also surveyed, albeit of other disciplines, show similarly high or only slightly lower values [28], [69], [70]. The mean values for resilience of the medical students in this study are lower than the values of students of other disciplines [71] and the German population in the age group from 14 to 30 years [51]. There are numerous possible reasons why the resilience scores of medical students are lower than those of other students or other study populations. Surveys show, for example, that medical students are exposed to high levels of stress [2], [72], that they more often suffer from sleep disorders [73], and from depression [4], [5]. The type of medical program (standard or reform program) also appears to have an influence on students’ stress levels [74]. Last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic has also led to stress and uncertainty among medical students [75], [76], [77]. All these factors can have a negative impact on medical students’ resilience. The mean values for optimism in the present study are slightly higher than in comparable studies that also examined medical students [34], [78], [79]. One reason for this may be that only medical students at the beginning of their studies were surveyed here, whereas the comparable studies surveyed medical students of all year groups [78], [79] or only at an advanced stage [34]. It seems plausible that medical students’ optimism decreases over the course of their studies, as their general mental health also deteriorates [11], [12], [13].

In summary, it can therefore be stated that gratitude has no significant direct effect on resilience in medical students. The initial hypothesis that gratitude is a predictor of resilience must therefore be rejected. However, the second hypothesis that there are indirect effects of gratitude on resilience that are mediated by resilience factors was confirmed. This shows that optimism in particular strengthens medical students’ resilience.

4.2. Possible implications for medical education

Knowledge of the positive effects of an optimistic attitude on medical students’ resilience can support the design and implementation of interventions aimed at positively influencing medical students’ resilience. Approaches such as the “Best Possible Self” (BPS) writing intervention developed by Laura King are interesting in this context. In this exercise, participants write about themselves in the future and imagine that their future life will turn out in the best possible way [80]. The BPS was examined with regard to its effect on a wide range of factors [81]. It was demonstrated that the BPS can also be used to promote an optimistic attitude [82], [83], [84]. Particularly in view of the limited evidence for resilience interventions that directly target resilience [27], the possible effect of an optimistic attitude on medical students’ resilience is becoming increasingly important. It may therefore be worthwhile to develop interventions that aim to strengthen students’ optimism in order to achieve a positive effect on their resilience and thus promote their mental health. In addition to interventions aimed at strengthening optimism, there is also a large number of gratitude exercises with effects on various outcome variables [85], [86], [87]. However, the evidence base for gratitude interventions is rather weak [88]. This could be explained by the overall low direct effects of gratitude on resilience, which the present study also points out. The study shows that it may be useful in future research on gratitude exercises to include optimism as a dependent outcome variable, as it is possible that gratitude training strengthens optimism, which in turn has a positive influence on resilience.

4.3. Limitations of the study

The present study has some limitations. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small. In addition, only students at one university were recruited, which is why it would be interesting to repeat the study at other locations. Furthermore, only pre-clinical students were examined, so the results can only be applied to a certain proportion of medical students. Possible changes during the course of studies can therefore not be mapped. The fact that the age of the participants was not recorded also leaves open to which extent age influenced the results. Moreover, all values collected are based on self-assessments and are therefore subjective. In order to make resilience research more objective, some researchers extend the self-assessment via questionnaires by also measuring the cortisol levels of test subjects [89]. It will certainly remain a challenge and the subject of future research to approach constructs such as gratitude and resilience appropriately in terms of objectification and operationalization. While the scales for measuring resilience, stress, self-efficacy expectation, social support and gratitude showed high internal consistencies comparable to other studies [37], [49], [53], [55], [57], the internal consistency of the scale for measuring optimism (Life Orientation Test) was comparatively low. This is not surprising given that a similarly low internal consistency (α=0.59) was observed in the validation study of the Life Orientation Test. This may indicate general methodological problems with the scale and shows the need for further methodological development in this area. The extent to which the limited internal consistency of the scale influenced the results of the present analysis remains unclear.

More women than men took part in the study. One explanation for this may be that significantly more women than men study medicine in Germany. According to the Federal Statistical Office, 37,036 of 98,736 medical students in 2019 were male (≈38%) and 61,700 were female (≈62%) [https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Education-Research-Culture/Institutions-Higher-Education/_node.html]. These figures are similar to the gender ratio at Witten/Herdecke University (male: 41% vs. female: 59%) [https://ranking.zeit.de/che/de/studiengang/6115] and also to the gender ratio in the present study. In addition, studies show that women generally appear to be more likely to participate in health surveys than men [90], [91]. It is also conceivable that women feel more attracted to a study on gratitude and resilience than men; however, this remains an assumption, as there is insufficient research on this topic. However, other studies on gratitude or resilience also show a similar gender ratio [27], [28]. The influence of other variables such as native language, nationality and religious affiliation was not investigated and should be the subject of future research. In addition, results may have been distorted as the survey was designated as a study on resilience and gratitude. This could, in the sense of a selection bias, have appealed to students who had already dealt with the respective concepts.


5. Conclusions

This study shows that gratitude has no significant direct effect on resilience. However, it was shown that optimism can strengthen the resilience of medical students and that gratitude has a mediated effect on resilience via optimism. The relationship between resilience and resilience factors therefore appears to be complex, meaning that a number of influencing factors and their interactions must be taken into account when providing trainings to strengthen resilience. The general conditions of studying and working must also be taken into account. Resilience helps people to stay healthy or to recover more quickly after challenges. Against this backdrop, it could make sense to integrate interventions that promote an optimistic attitude into medical studies and thus strengthen the mental health of future doctors in a preventive and long-term manner. Which interventions are particularly suitable for medical students must be further investigated in future controlled and prospective studies. The results of this study can be used to better understand the underlying mechanisms that contribute to medical students’ resilience and the role that optimism plays in this.



Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all students of the Faculty of Health at the UW/H who participated in this study and Christina Wagner for her support in translating the English version of the article.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

1.
Firth J. Levels and sources of stress in medical students. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6529):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6529.1177 External link
2.
Sherina MS, Rampal L, Kaneson N. Psychological stress among undergraduate medical students. Med J Malaysia. 2004;59(2):207-211.
3.
Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Stress and depression among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):594-604. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x External link
4.
Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, Shanafeldt TD. Burnout among US medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general US population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443-451. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000134 External link
5.
Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, Sen S, Mata DA. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2214-2236. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.17324 External link
6.
Wege N, Muth T, Li J, Angerer P. Mental health among currently enrolled medical students in Germany. Public Health. 2016;132:92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.12.014 External link
7.
Watzke S, Pukas L, Rabkow N, Keuch L, Ehring E, Fuchs S, Stoevesandt D, Sapalidis A, Pelzer A, Rehnisch, Watzke S. Prevalence and predictive factors for depressive symptoms among medical students in Germany-a cross-sectional study. GMS J Med Educ. 2022;39(1):Doc13. DOI: 10.3205/zma001534 External link
8.
Saleem S, Saleem T. Role of religiosity in psychological well-being among medical and non-medical students. J Relig Health. 2017;56(4):1180-1190. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-016-0341-5 External link
9.
Husnain MA. Stress level comparison of medical and non-medical students: A cross-sectional study done at various professional colleges in Karachi, Pakistan. Acta Psychopathol (Wilmington). 2017;3(2):8. DOI: 10.4172/2469-6676.100080 External link
10.
Noreen A, Iqbal N, Hassan B, Ali SA. Relationship between psychological distress, quality of life and resilience among medical and non-medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(9):2181-2185. DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.04-611 External link
11.
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(12):1613-1622. DOI: 10.4065/80.12.1613 External link
12.
Ludwig AB, Burton W, Weingarten J, Milan F, Myers DC, Kligler B. Depression and stress amongst undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:141. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0425-z External link
13.
Moir F, Yielder J, Sanson J, Chen Y. Depression in medical students: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:323-333. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S137384 External link
14.
Hsu K, Marshall V. Prevalence of depression and distress in a large sample of. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144(12):1561-1566. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.144.12.1561 External link
15.
Dong M, Zhou FC, Xu SW, Zhang Q, Ng CH, Ungvari GS, Xiang YT. Prevalence of suicide-related behaviors among physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020;50(6):1264-1275. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12690 External link
16.
Harvey SB, Epstein RM, Glozier N, Petrie K, Strudwick J, Gayed A, Dean K, Henderson M. Mental illness and suicide among physicians. Lancet. 2021;398(10303):920-930. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01596-8 External link
17.
Collier R. Healthier doctors, healthier patients. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):E895-E896. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4327 External link
18.
Bonanno GA, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D. Psychological resilience after disaster: New York City in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):181-186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01682.x External link
19.
Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20 External link
20.
Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, Panter-Brick C, Yehuda R. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014;5(1):25338. DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338 External link
21.
Southwick SM, Charney DS. The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression. Science. 2012;338(6103):79-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.1222942 External link
22.
MacLeod S, Musich S, Hawkins K, Alsgaard K, Wicker ER. The impact of resilience among older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2016;37(4):266-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.02.014 External link
23.
Wermelinger A, Lucchetti L, Lucchetti G. Association between depression and resilience in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(3):237-246. DOI: 10.1002/gps.4619 External link
24.
Bengel J, Lyssenko L. Resilienz und psychologische Schutzfaktoren im Erwachsenenalter: Stand der Forschung zu psychologischen Schutzfaktoren von Gesundheit im Erwachsenenalter. Köln: BZgA Bundeszentrale für Gesundheitliche Aufklärung; 2012. DOI: 10.4126/38m-005111600 External link
25.
Kalisch R, Müller MB, Tüscher O. Advancing empirical resilience research. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e128. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000023 External link
26.
Southwick SM, Charney DS. Resilience: The science of mastering life's greatest challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
27.
Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, König J, Chmitorz A, Wessa M, Binder H, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students. Cochrane Database Systc Rev. 2020;(7):CD013684. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013684 External link
28.
Linz S, Helmreich I, Kunzler A, Chmitorz A, Lieb K, Kubiak T. Interventionen zur Resilienzförderung bei Erwachsenen [Interventions To Promote Resilience In Adults - A Narrative Review]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol.. 2020;70(01):11-21. DOI: 10.1055/a-0830-4745 External link
29.
Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(2):320-333. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320 External link
30.
Panter-Brick C, Eggerman M. Understanding culture, resilience, and mental health: The production of hope. In: Ungar M, editor. The social ecology of resilience: A handbook of theory and practice. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2012. p.369-386. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3_29 External link
31.
Antonovsky A. Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. In: Forum für Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis. Tübingen: dgvt-Verlag; 1997. p.33-46.
32.
Al-Yagon M, Margalit M. Positive and negative affect among mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. Br J Dev Dis. 2009;55(109):109-127. DOI: 10.1179/096979509799103070 External link
33.
Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(10):1129-1148. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008 External link
34.
Hojat M, Vergare M, Isenberg G, Cohen M, Spandorfer J. Underlying construct of empathy, optimism, and burnout in medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:12. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.54c3.60cd External link
35.
Thompson G, McBride RB, Hosford CC, Halaas G. Resilience among medical students: the role of coping style and social support. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):174-182. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146611 External link
36.
Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Performance-based self-esteem and burnout in a cross-sectional study of medical students. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):43-48. DOI: 10.1080/01421590601175309 External link
37.
McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Emperical Topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(1):112-127. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112 External link
38.
Lambert NM, Fincham FD, Stillman TF. Gratitude and depressive symptoms: The role of positive reframing and positive emotion. Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):615-633. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2011.595393 External link
39.
Emmons RA, Shelton CM. Gratitude and the science of positive psychology. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p.459-471.
40.
Wood AM, Maltby J, Gillett R, Linley PA, Joseph S. The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies. J Res Pers. 2008;42(4):854-871. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003 External link
41.
Komter AE. Gratitude and gift exchange. In: Emmons RA, McCullough ME, editors. The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. p.195-212. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.003.0010 External link
42.
Bono G, Emmons RA, McCullough ME. Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude. In: Linley PA, Joseph S, editors. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2004. p.464-481. DOI:10.1002/9780470939338.ch29 External link
43.
Borgueta AM. Adapting gratitude interventions to the practice of clinical psychology: Considerations for treatment selection and implementation. Palo Alto (CA): Palo Alto University; 2011.
44.
Gupta N, Kumar S. Significant predictors for resilience among a sample of undergraduate students: Acceptance, forgiveness and gratitude. Indian J Health Wellbeing. 2015;6(2):188-191.
45.
Isaacs K, Mota NP, Tsai J, Harpaz-Rotem I, Cook JM, Kirwin PD, Krystal JH, Soutwick SM, Pietrzak RH. Psychological resilience in US military veterans: A 2-year, nationally representative prospective cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:301-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.017 External link
46.
Proyer R, editor. A recipe for a "positive psychology stew": German adaptations of nine questionnaires from positive psychology. 10th Congress of the Swiss Society of Psychology; 2007. Zürich: Swiss Society of Psychology; 2007.
47.
Kong F, You X, Zhao J. Evaluation of the gratitude questionnaire in a Chinese sample of adults: factorial validity, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance across sex. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1498. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01498 External link
48.
Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(2):165-178.
49.
Leppert K, Koch B, Brähler E, Strauß B. Die Resilienzskala (RS) - Überprüfung der Langform RS-25 und einer Kurzform RS-13. Klin Diagn Eval. 2008;2:226-243.
50.
Wagnild G. A review of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(2):105-113. DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.2.105 External link
51.
Schumacher J, Leppert K, Gunzelmann T, Strauß B, Brähler E. Die Resilienzskala – Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personenmerkmal. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 2005;53(1):16-39.
52.
Glaesmer H, Hoyer J, Klotsche J, Herzberg PY. Die deutsche Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen Optimismus und Pessimismus. Z Gesundheitspsychol. 2008;16(1):26-31. DOI: 10.1026/0943-8149.16.1.26 External link
53.
Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Skala zur allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin; 1999.
54.
Sommer G, Fydrich T. Entwicklung und Überprüfung eines Fragebogens zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SOZU). Diagnostica. 1991;37(2):160-178. DOI: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.212 External link
55.
Fydrich T, Sommer G, Tydecks S, Brähler E. Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14) [Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU): Standardization of short form (K-14)]. Z Med Psychol. 2009;18(1):43-48.
56.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. Perceived stress scale. In: Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood GL, editors. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p.1-2.
57.
Schneider EE, Schönfelder S, Domke-Wolf M, Wessa M. Measuring stress in clinical and nonclinical subjects using a German adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020;20(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.03.004 External link
58.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6the edition. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2012.
59.
Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Method. 2002;7(4):422. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 External link
60.
Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408-420. DOI: 10.1080/03637750903310360 External link
61.
Rosseel Y, Oberski D, Byrnes J, Vanbrabant L, Savalei V, Merkle E, Hallquist M, Rhemtulla M, Katsikatsou M, Barendse M, Scharf F, Du H. Package 'lavaan'. R package version 0.6-3. 2018. Zugänglich unter/available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/index.html External link
62.
Scheier MF, Carver CS. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16(2):201-228. DOI: 10.1007/BF01173489 External link
63.
Conversano C, Rotondo A, Lensi E, Della Vista O, Arpone F, Reda MA. Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2010;6:25-29. DOI: 10.2174/1745017901006010025 External link
64.
Patton GC, Tollit MM, Romaniuk H, Spence SH, Sheffield J, Sawyer MG. A prospective study of the effects of optimism on adolescent health risks. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):308-316. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0748 External link
65.
Kardas F, Zekeriya CAM, Eskisu M, Gelibolu S. Gratitude, hope, optimism and life satisfaction as predictors of psychological well-being. Eurasian J Educ Res. 2019;19(82):81-100. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2019.82.5 External link
66.
Maheshwari A, Jutta MV. Study of relationship between optimism and resilience in the times of COVID-19 among university students. Int J Indian Psychol. 2020;8(3):1539-1550.
67.
Gómez Molinero R, Zayas García A, Ruiz González P, Guil R. Optimism and resilience among university students. Int J Develop Educ Psychol. 2018;1:147-154. 2018.
68.
Segovia F, Moore JL, Linnville SE, Hoyt RE, Hain RE. Optimism predicts resilience in repatriated prisoners of war: A 37-year longitudinal study. J Trauma Stress. 2012;25(3):330-336. DOI: 10.1002/jts.21691 External link
69.
Chen LH, Chen MY, Kee YH, Tsai YM. Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. J Happiness Stud. 2009;10(6):655-664. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-008-9112-7 External link
70.
Schnitker SA, Richardson KL. Framing gratitude journaling as prayer amplifies its hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, but not health, benefits. J Posit Psychol. 2019;14(4):427-439. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1460690 External link
71.
Madewell AN, Ponce-Garcia E. Assessing resilience in emerging adulthood: The resilience scale (RS), Connor–Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC), and scale of protective factors (SPF). Pers Individ Dif. 2016;97:249-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.036 External link
72.
Heinen I, Bullinger M, Kocalevent RD. Perceived stress in first year medical students-associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):4. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0841-8 External link
73.
Almojali AI, Almalki SA, Alothman AS, Masuadi EM, Alaqeel MK. The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical students. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;7(3):169-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jegh.2017.04.005 External link
74.
Kiessling C, Schubert B, Scheffner D, Burger W. First year medical students' perceptions of stress and support: a comparison between reformed and traditional track curricula. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):504-509. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2929.2004.01816.x External link
75.
Wathelet M, Duhem S, Vaiva G, Baubet T, Habran E, Veerapa E, Debien C, Molenda S, Horn M, Grandgenèvre P, Notredam CE, D’Hondt F. Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2025591. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591 External link
76.
Faisal RA, Jobe MC, Ahmed O, Sharker T. Mental health status, anxiety, and depression levels of Bangladeshi university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1500-1515. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00458-y External link
77.
O'Byrne L, Gavin B, Adamis D, Lim YX, McNicholas F. Levels of stress in medical students due to COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2021;47(6):383-388. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107155 External link
78.
Shi M, Liu L, Wang ZY, Wang L. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and its correlations with positive psychological variables among Chinese medical students: An exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:3. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0710-3 External link
79.
Souri H, Hasanirad T. Relationship between resilience, optimism and psychological well-being in students of medicine. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;30:1541-1544. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.299 External link
80.
King LA. The health benefits of writing about life goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(7):798-807. DOI: 10.1177/014616720127700 External link
81.
Loveday PM, Lovell GP, Jones CM. The best possible selves intervention: A review of the literature to evaluate efficacy and guide future research. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:607-628. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9824-z External link
82.
Peters ML, Flink IK, Boersma K, Linton SJ. Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(3):204-211. DOI: 10.1080/17439761003790963 External link
83.
Hanssen MM, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Meevissen YM, Vancleef LM. Optimism lowers pain: evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms. Pain. 2013;154(1):53-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.006 External link
84.
Boselie JJ, Vancleef LM, Smeets T, Peters ML. Increasing optimism abolishes pain-induced impairments in executive task performance. Pain. 2014;155(2):334-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.014 External link
85.
Froh JJ, Sefick WJ, Emmons RA. Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. J Sch Psychol. 2008;46(2):213-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.03.005 External link
86.
Davis DE, Choe E, Meyers J, Wade N, Varjas K, Gifford A, Quinn A, Hook JN, Van Tongeren DR, Griffin BJ, Worthington EL. Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. J Couns Psychol. 2016;63(1):20-31. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000107 External link
87.
Megawati P, Lestari S, Lestari R. Gratitude training to improve subjective well-being among adolescents living on orphanages. Human Indonesian Psychol J. 2019;16(1):13-22. DOI: 10.26555/humanitas.v16i1.9196 External link
88.
Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):119. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 External link
89.
Simeon D, Yehuda R, Cunill R, Knutelska M, Putnam FW, Smith LM. Factors associated with resilience in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(8-10):1149-1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.08.005 External link
90.
Smith G. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. San José: San José State University; 2008.
91.
Otufowora A, Liu Y, Young H, Egan KL, Varma DS, Striley CW, Cottler LB. Sex differences in willingness to participate in research based on study risk level among a community sample of African Americans in North Central Florida. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2021;23(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-020-01015-4 External link