gms | German Medical Science

GMS Journal for Medical Education

Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

ISSN 2366-5017

Production and digital discussion of video presentations by students – a project report

short report Students

Search Medline for

  • Katja Krug - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Germany
  • corresponding author Johanna Mink - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Heidelberg, Germany

GMS J Med Educ 2020;37(7):Doc71

doi: 10.3205/zma001364, urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0013644

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/journals/zma/2020-37/zma001364.shtml

Received: July 22, 2020
Revised: September 21, 2020
Accepted: October 15, 2020
Published: December 3, 2020

© 2020 Krug et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

In the summer semester 2020, the module "People in different stages of life" in the Bachelor program "Interprofessional Health Care, B.Sc." had to be adapted to online teaching. The module exam, originally planned as an oral presentation, was presented by the students in interprofessional tandems as a video presentation using case studies. Based on cognitive and social constructivism, all students reflected on these video presentations using the "Think-Pair-Share” method. Similar to regular inverted classroom methods, knowledge transfer through the video presentations was asynchronous and cognitively constructive; accompanying discussion questions of the respective speakers were answered in writing by the fellow students (Think). The students met independently online in small groups on a regular basis to discuss the respective presentations and questions based on personal and professional experiences (Pair; socially constructed). In open online debriefings with the lecturers, the speakers and all interested students, relevant aspects were taken up and discussed again (Share). First experiences showed that the students enjoyed the production of the video presentations and that many of them voluntarily participated in the discussion rounds, in which aspects of health care beyond the presentations were discussed. Considering the experiences made, continuing online teaching in this format may be worthwhile for both lecturers and students.

Keywords: e-learning, health professions, interprofessional learning, think pair share, inverted classroom, video presentation


Introduction

Learning with digital media needs to be embedded in social interaction [1], [2], since knowledge is not only subjectively constructed, but also adjusted and consolidated in social exchange. In interprofessional teaching, this so-called social constructivism is important for the acquisition of competencies in addition to the individual examination of new content in terms of cognitive constructivism [3]. The integration of different forms of learning, such as blended learning and inverted classroom methods, can have positive effects on gaining knowledge and acquiring skills in the training of health care professions [4], [5]. For example, knowledge can be cognitively constructed with the help of videos [6] in an asynchronous format and socially constructed in interactive phases of attendance.

By switching to sole online teaching, the 2-semester module "People in different stages of life" of the Bachelor program "Interprofessional Health Care, B.Sc." was also adapted.

The challenge was to enable independent and collective online learning in a way that supported all students in cognitive and social knowledge construction. In the online format, the presentation was retained as a form of examination and implemented as a video presentation. The production of learning videos enables the independent construction of knowledge since content must be understood and didactically prepared [7]. For reflection and discussion of the video presentations, the "Think-Pair-Share” method [8] was applied online in a modified form, since this method enables the individual, cognitive (Think) as well as the collective, social (Pair, Share) construction of knowledge.


Module description

Regular module schedule

The module begins regularly in the 7th semester (winter) providing students with theoretical basic knowledge about health and disease aspects in different stages of life. In the following summer semester, the students usually prepare a presentation in an interprofessional tandem, analysing a case study using a stage theory model [9], [10], [11], identifying opportunities and challenges associated with the stage of life, and analysing interprofessional collaboration. This is based on content from the winter semester, own experiences and profession-specific expertise. The presentations conclude with discussion questions to encourage exchange among fellow students from different health care professions. In this way, the students gain insights into the fields of activity of the other professions and can further develop their own understanding of their roles.

Updated module schedule for the summer semester 2020 – online

After the winter semester had taken place regularly, the 16 students in the 8th semester (professional trainees in speech language therapy, physiotherapy, medical radiology assistance, medical laboratory assistance, nursing, orthoptics) received sample videos and a written summary with information on video production at the beginning of the summer semester via an e-learning platform (Moodle); they evaluated the videos and derived criteria for effective videos in individual work. The submitted criteria were summarized by the lecturer in a document and made available to all students via Moodle, based on the constructivist approach.

The students (presenters) created video presentations with concluding discussion questions in interprofessional tandems following the regular requirements of the assignment. A maximum of 2 video presentations were made available to the students via Moodle on 5 fixed dates and were reflected upon and discussed in 14-day cycles using the "Think-Pair-Share” method (see figure 1 [Fig. 1]). In this way, the students were able to access existing knowledge in their own learning time and link it with new knowledge so that the opinions and expertise of all could be integrated.


Experiences

At present, no structured evaluation is available, only first experiences based on informal feedback from students and lessons learned from the lecturers are described. The students said they enjoyed the production of the video presentations (especially laying techniques and screencasts). The written reflections showed that the students dealt intensively with the case studies and the module content in terms of cognitive knowledge construction (Think). The small group meetings (Pair) promoted independent learning and gave freedom of planning. At least 60% of the students took part in each of the 5 presentation meetings (Share). Topics that went beyond the presentation were discussed, expertise and perspectives were exchanged and social knowledge construction was achieved. The individual feedback of the lecturers, which often provided food for thought for the discussion, was experienced positively by the students as appreciation of their own workload, but was rarely taken up by them in the presentation meeting.


Discussion

The online application of the "Think-Pair-Share" method has been successful. Video presentations can be retained as an exam format. The production and reception of videos as a substitute for live presentations allows for an individual organisation of learning time and an experience-based occupation with the topic. Structured reflection and discussion enable collaborative and interprofessional learning.

The presentation meetings should preferably be conducted face-to-face to foster blended learning, since online conferences allow less intensive interaction.

For the feedback on the individual reflections, peer feedback could be useful in the context of Think-Pair-Share to promote further social knowledge construction. All in all, a clear formulation of the work assignment for the presentations and discussion groups is essential.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

1.
Stegmann K, Wecker C, Mandl H, Fischer F. Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien. Ansätze und Befunde der empirischen Bildungsforschung. In: Tippelt R, Schmidt-Hertha B, editors. Handbuch Bildungsforschung. 4., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage. Heidelberg: Springer VS; 2018. p.967-988. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-19981-8_42 External link
2.
Waterston R. Interaction in online interprofessional education case discussions. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(4):272-279. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2011.566647 External link
3.
Hean S, Craddock D, O'Halloran C. Learning theories and interprofessional education: a user's guide. Learn Health Soc Care. 2009;8(4):250-262.
4.
Liu Q, Peng WJ, Zhang F, Hu R, Li YX, Yan WR. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e2. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4807 External link
5.
Tolks D, Schäfer C, Raupach T, Kruse L, Sarikas A, Gerhardt-Szép S, Klauer G, Lemos M, Fischer MR, Eichner B, Sostmann K, Hege I. An Introducation tot he Inverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions. GMS J Med Educ. 2016;33(3):Doc46. DOI: 10.3205/zma001045 External link
6.
Grosser J, Bientzle M, Kimmerle J. A Literature Review on the Foundations and Potentials of Digital Teaching Scenarios for Interprofessional Health Care Education. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3410. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103410 External link
7.
Arnold S, Zech J. Kleine Didaktik des Erklärvideos. Braunschweig: Westermann; 2019.
8.
Bönsch M. Unterrichtsmethoden - kreativ und vielfältig. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verl. Hohengehren; 2002.
9.
Erikson EH. Identity and the life cycle. New York, London: W.W. Norton; 1980.
10.
Piaget J. Das Erwachen der Intelligenz beim Kinde. Stuttgart: Klett; 1969.
11.
Schulz R, Heckhausen J. A Life Span Model of Successful Aging. Am Psychol. 1996;51(7):702-714. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.702 External link