gms | German Medical Science

GMS Zeitschrift für Hebammenwissenschaft

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e.V. (DGHWi)

ISSN 2366-5076

Disrespect and abuse during childbirth

Position Paper

  • corresponding author Claudia Limmer - Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
  • Sabine Striebich - Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
  • Dorothea Tegethoff - Protestant University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Germany
  • Tina Jung - Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
  • Julia Leinweber - Protestant University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Germany
  • German Society of Midwifery Science (DGHWi)

GMS Z Hebammenwiss 2020;7:Doc05

doi: 10.3205/zhwi000019, urn:nbn:de:0183-zhwi0000199

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/journals/zhwi/2020-7/zhwi000019.shtml

Received: March 2, 2020
Accepted: July 24, 2020
Published: December 10, 2020

© 2020 Limmer et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

Studies and reports from around the world document that women are experiencing disrespect and abuse during childbirth, both within and outside hospitals. The abuse described ranges from neglect and discrimination to verbal insults, insufficient information being provided before an intervention or procedure, and even physical violence. Disrespect and abuse can lead to a traumatic birth experience and those witnessing obstetric violence may also be traumatised. This can result in serious long-term health impacts.

The German Society of Midwifery Science (DGHWi) considers it important for midwives to accept responsibility for any actions or inactions on their part that may be disrespectful and abusive, whether wilfully or otherwise. The DGHWi regards it as necessary for a national health strategy to be formulated, aimed at ascertaining the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Germany and developing strategies for prevention in order to guarantee woman- and family-centred and human rights-based obstetric care in Germany.

Keywords: respectful care at birth, human rights, women's rights, obstetric violence, midwives


Background

The rights of women to dignified, respectful healthcare are emphasised in the WHO statement (2014) on the prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth [17]. In July 2019, the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women presented a report on violence during childbirth based on over 130 submissions from around the world as well as regional reports [15]. As the report illustrates, around the world women’s rights, which are also basic human rights, are systematically violated during childbirth, both within and outside hospitals. Following this report, in October 2019, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution 2306: Obstetric and gynaecological violence [12]. In this resolution, the member states are called on to take targeted action to guarantee that women’s rights are fully respected everywhere, thus granting all women humane, respectful support that upholds their dignity in pregnancy and during and after childbirth.

Experiences of disrespect and abuse during childbirth can result in a traumatic birth experience [8], [13]. This can lead to serious long-term health impacts for the woman and consequences for her relationship with her newborn as well as her family [1], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Midwives can also suffer from long-term psychological effects as a result of witnessing or participating in an abusive situation while attending a birth [9].

The DGHWi condemns all forms of disrespect and violence in childbirth and emphasises that healthcare personnel have a duty to always provide care that is sensitive and respectful. Midwives must accept responsibility for any of their actions or inactions that may – wilfully or otherwise – be disrespectful or violent towards birthing mothers, their newborns and birth companions.


Types of obstetric violence

The WHO commissioned a research group to develop an evidence-based typology of obstetric violence based on a systematic review of 65 largely qualitative studies [2]. According to this typology, obstetric violence should be categorised into physical and sexual abuse, verbal abuse, stigma and discrimination, failure to meet professional standards of care, poor rapport between women and providers, as well as conditions and constraints in the healthcare system, in general. There were reports of physical and verbal abuse, humiliation, degrading treatment, neglect and even complete abandonment and discrimination; pain relief is refused, birthing mothers are not included in decision-making and obstetric interventions are conducted without the consent of the birthing mother [2]. Disrespect and abuse in childbirth can also relate to newborns and relatives [14].


Prevalence

Currently, the available data on obstetric violence in high-income countries is scarce. In a survey on women’s experiences during pregnancy and childbirth conducted in 2016 in the USA [16], 17.3 percent of the 2,138 respondents reported having experienced one or more forms of mistreatment during childbirth. African American or Hispanic women who are disadvantaged due to their socio-economic status or health, and women who gave birth in hospitals were particularly effected. For Germany too, there are various reports on obstetric violence (http://www.gerechte-geburt.de/wissen/gewalt-in-der-geburtshilfe). Since 2013, the “Roses Revolution Deutschland” platform has also provided women with an opportunity to write about their experiences (http://www.facebook.com/RosesRevolutionDeutschland). The results of a social media survey conducted among 2,045 participants in November 2018 show the high relevance of different forms of in-facility disrespect and violence in Germany [10], [11].


Respectful care at birth as a human right

Based on the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 1 of Germany’s Basic Law sets out the inviolability of human dignity, article 2 guarantees the right to physical integrity and article 3 prohibits any form of discrimination. Standards of obstetric care are derived from the 2013 Patient Rights Law: The treating personnel must provide clear information on all circumstances relating to the planned birth (section 630c), must explain the planned procedures in detail and in a timely manner, both verbally and in written form (section 630e), and must obtain the informed consent of the pregnant woman regarding the planned measures (section 630d).


DGHWi’s claims

The DGHWi advocates woman-/family-centred and human rights-based care at birth in compliance with the 9th German national health objective “Health and Childbirth” (Gesundheit rund um die Geburt) [3] and the principles of respectful care at birth [18]. The DGHWi calls for those responsible for health policy to ensure that a strategy is devised to facilitate the full, nationwide implementation of these principles of care during childbirth.

The DGHWi advocates increased cooperation between all relevant professional societies and associations to develop interdisciplinary measures to ensure respectful, trauma-sensitive, non-violent care for pregnant and birthing women, new mothers and their newborn babies. This includes additional training on caring for particularly vulnerable women, such as women with previous experience of violence or extreme fear of childbirth, as well as the development of evidence-based, health-related information and decision-making aids on obstetric interventions.

The DGHWi calls for research on the prevalence and prevention of disrespect and violence at birth to be stepped up. Funding programmes are needed for both qualitative and quantitative research designs.

The DGHWi considers the following measures to be necessary in order to prevent disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Germany and to combat its existence:

1.
Establishment of respectful care in obstetrics as a quality criterion
2.
Regular and systematic evaluation of women’s birth experiences at the national level
3.
Easily accessible complaints mechanism for those effected by obstetric violence as well as support structures ensuring appropriate care/therapy for those effected
4.
Improvement of the conditions to enable woman-/family-centred care in obstetrics, for example the provision of sufficient resources for one-to-one midwife care during childbirth
5.
Implementation of institutional protection concepts to prevent and combat in-facility violence, including additional training for professionals involved in obstetric care

Note

This position paper was made available to members of the DGHWi for comments from 03.03.2020 to 15.04.2020 and was revised based on the comments received. This position paper is scheduled for revision by 31.07.2024.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

1.
Ayers S, Eagle A, Waring H. The effects of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder on women and their relationships: A qualitative study. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(4):389-98. DOI: 10.1080/13548500600708409 External link
2.
Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 External link
3.
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Nationales Gesundheitsziel - Gesundheit rund um die Geburt. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit; 2017.
4.
Cook N, Ayers S, Horsch A. Maternal posttraumatic stress disorder during the perinatal period and child outcomes: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:18-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.045 External link
5.
Dikmen Yildiz P, Ayers S, Phillips L. The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in pregnancy and after birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:634–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.009 External link
6.
Ford E, Ayers S. Stressful events and support during birth: The effect on anxiety, mood and perceived control. J Anxiety Disord. 2009;23(2):260-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.07.009 External link
7.
Grekin R, O'Hara MW. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(5):389-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.003 External link
8.
Harris R, Ayers S. What makes labour and birth traumatic? A survey of intrapartum ‘hotspots’. Psychol Health. 2012;27(10):1166-77.DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.649755 External link
9.
Leinweber J, Creedy DK, Rowe H, Gamble J. Responses to birth trauma and prevalence of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives. Women Birth. 2017;30(1):40-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.006 External link
10.
Limmer C. Measuring disrespect and abuse during childbirth in a high-income country: Development and validation of a German self-report tool. Unveröffentlichte Masterarbeit. Hannover: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; 2019.
11.
Limmer C, Stoll K, Gross M. Respektlosigkeit und Gewalt in der Geburtshilfe: Ergebnisse einer deutschen Validierungsstudie. In: 29. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin; 2019 Nov 28-30; Berlin, Germany.
12.
Parlamentary Assembly. Obstetrical and gynaecological violence. European Council; 2019.
13.
Reed R, Sharman R, Inglis C. Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0 External link
14.
Sacks E. Defining disrespect and abuse of newborns - a review of the evidence and an expanded typology of respectful maternity care. Reproductive Health. 2017;14(66). DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0326-1 External link
15.
UN General Assembly. A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence. UN; 2019.
16.
Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, et al. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 External link
17.
World Health Organisation. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2014.
18.
World Health Organisation. WHO recommendation on respectful maternity care during labour and childbirth. Geneva: World Health Orginisation; 2018.