gms | German Medical Science

GMDS 2014: 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e. V. (GMDS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie

07. - 10.09.2014, Göttingen

Report fields for mapping the quality of care

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • B. Moreno - ID Berlin Information und Dokumentation im Gesundheitswesen, Berlin
  • E. Hahnel - Charité Universitätsklinikum Berlin, Berlin

GMDS 2014. 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). Göttingen, 07.-10.09.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. DocAbstr. 321

doi: 10.3205/14gmds213, urn:nbn:de:0183-14gmds2133

Veröffentlicht: 4. September 2014

© 2014 Moreno et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Backround and Objective: The demographic changes have a fundamental impact on the future number of people needing care in the international context. In addition, the claims and ideas about quality of health care are growing. The public reporting of quality imagine factors to a comprehensible language of nursing [1].

The present study generates possible report fields for mapping the quality of care.

Methods: Based on a systematic literature search of bibliographic databases, international agencies, healthcare institutions and the HTA database of INAHTA, the empirical basis for the development of nursing-sensitive report fields for public reporting has been determined [2], [3], [4]. A modification of the methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and the German AQUA-Institute was applied. The extensive search for information provides the basis for the development of a model for implementation the report fields.

Results: Based on the information synthesis of the systematic literature search 20 potential report fields are identified for mapping the quality of care. Factors of influence are subordinated to the quality dimensions. The majority of the included sources comes from the USA with a total of 52%, followed by UK (23.8%) and Canada (14.3%). The model "triple jump of care" summerized the investigated factors.

Conclusions: In summary, the forward-looking approach to involve nurses in development processes as well as give support on how to participate in continuing education and training is constructive in order to optimize the quality of care. The public report of care associated quality creates transparency and comparability. The study provides a basis for further research to optimize the quality of care.


References

1.
Albanese MP, Evans DA, Schantz CA. Engaging clinical nurses in quality and performance improvement activities. Nursing administration quarterly. 2010;34(3):226-45.
2.
Faber M, Wollersheim H, Leatherman S. Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Medical Care. 2009;47(1):1-8.
3.
Gurzik M, Kesten KS. The Impact of Clinical Nurse Specialist on Clinical Pathways in the Application of Evidence-Based Practice. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2010;26(1):42-8.
4.
Kane RL, Shamliyan T, Mueller C. Nursing Staffing and Quality of Patient Care - Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 151. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publication No 07-E005.