gms | German Medical Science

GMS Journal for Medical Education

Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

ISSN 2366-5017

Curricular adaptations to the 21st Century: the Mayo Clinic Experience

Lecture 11. Grazer Konferenz 03.-05. Mai 2007, Salzburg

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author Jospeh P. Grande - Mayo Medical School, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Rochester, USA

GMS Z Med Ausbild 2007;24(3):Doc137

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/journals/zma/2007-24/zma000431.shtml

Eingereicht: 31. Mai 2007
Veröffentlicht: 15. August 2007

© 2007 Grande.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Lecture

There is widespread concern among accrediting agencies, the public, and the medical establishment that medical schools are failing to develop competencies in their students that are essential for the delivery of quality medical care. In response to these concerns, Mayo Medical School has embarked upon a critical evaluation of its curriculum. Beginning with our mission - to use a patient-centered focus and strengths of the Mayo Clinic to educate physicians to serve society by assuming leadership roles

in medical practice, education and research - we have charged our faculty with the responsibility of developing a series of outcomes to ensure that our students meet basic competencies, including medical knowledge, patient care, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, practice based learning and improvement, and systems based practice. We have recently completed the process of mapping our curricular outcomes to the basic competencies. Our curriculum committee will use these outcomes to provide the basis for decisions regarding changes to the curriculum, including allocation of time and resources. We are actively engaged in the process of developing tools to reliably assess our curricular outcomes. It is clear that the traditional multiple choice examinations will need to be supplemented by other assessment modalities, including direct observation, peer evaluation, and portfolio tracking.