gms | German Medical Science

18. Internationales SkillsLab Symposium 2024

21.03. - 23.03.2024, Krems, Austria

The role of evaluation forms as learing materials

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author Anja Remškar - Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Čemšenik, Slovenia
  • author presenting/speaker Lara Dreu - Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Slovenia
  • author Anže Lečnik - Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Slovenia
  • author Sebastjan Bevc - Clinic for Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia

18. Internationales SkillsLab Symposium 2024. Krems, Österreich, 21.-23.03.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocP1.1

doi: 10.3205/24isls41, urn:nbn:de:0183-24isls418

Published: May 27, 2024

© 2024 Remškar et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Learning clinical skills is an important part of medical education. Acquired skills can be tested and evaluated in different ways. One of the possibilities is the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). OSCE at MFUM consists of five stations: history taking, abdomen, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, and musculoskeletal system.

Methods: We compared the results of OSCE from academic years 2022/23 (86 students) and 2023/24 (106 students). Students from the year 2022/23 did not receive evaluation forms as learning material, whereas students from the year 2023/24 did. We focused on the percentages achieved and time required to complete an examination.

Results:Overall OSCE results achieved were significantly higher in students 2023/24 (p<0.001) and in following examinations specifically: history-taking (p=0.021), cardiovascular system (p<0.001), respiratory system (p<0.001) and musculoskeletal system (p=0.019).

Comparing the time required for an examination, there was a statistically significant improvement (less time required to complete an examination) in the year 2023/24 in history-taking examination (p=0,025) and locomotor system examination (p=0,028).

Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in comparing overall OSCE results between students in different academic years. Results show improvement in students who have previously received evaluation forms as learning materials. There was also a statistically significant difference in specific examinations: history-taking, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, and locomotor system. There was less time required for a history-taking and locomotor system examination in students 2023/24.