gms | German Medical Science

84th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

08.05. - 12.05.2013, Nürnberg

Treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a literature review

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author Ilhana Setic - ENT Clinc, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Jasminka Alagic-Smailbegovic - ENT Clinc, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mersiha Becirovic - ENT Clinc, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. 84. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. Nürnberg, 08.-12.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13hnod534

doi: 10.3205/13hnod534, urn:nbn:de:0183-13hnod5347

Published: April 15, 2013

© 2013 Setic et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Although systemic steroids are accepted as the only efficacious treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) in controlled clinical trials, recent publications suggest new therapeutic options. The present study reviewed the available evidence for efficacy of different therapeutics for the management of ISSNHL.

Methods: Literature search was focused on articles of PubMed and MEDLINE databases published in the last 5 years.

Results: We identified 41 articles, of which 34 were evaluated. The most widely used therapeutic agents were systemic steroids in 19 (55.9%) trials. There were also in total 21 (61.8%) trials concerning efficiency of intratympanic steroids, mostly as subsequent treatment after systemic steroids in 9 (26.7%), as primary treatment in 8 (23.5%), or as simultaneous therapy in 4 (11.8%) trials. The very next were trials with hyperbaric oxygen, in total 6 (17.6%). Others, as vasodilatators and vasoactive substances, and rheopheresis researched in 4 (11.8%), while antivirals, dextran, coenzime Q, zinc gluconate, acupuncture, local hypoterimia and ozone therapy, all combined with systemic steroids, researched in 1 (2.9%) clinical trial each.

Conclusion: Patients suffering from ISSNHL, especially those with hearing impairment refractory to systemic steroids, need new therapeutic options. On the basis of recent clinical studies, intratympanic steroids can be a valuable solution. There is currently no evidence to support the use of antivirals nor vasodilatators. Although other therapeutics as hyperbaric oxygen, coenzime Q, zinc gluconate, etc. demonstrated a statistically significant benefit, it is still unclear if this difference is clinically significant. Further clinical trials are needed to validate these results.

Der Erstautor gibt keinen Interessenkonflikt an.