gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e. V. (GMDS), 12. Jahreskongress der Technologie- und Methodenplattform für die vernetzte medizinische Forschung e. V. (TMF)

26. - 30.09.2021, online

Polygenic risk scores – Is there a different distribution within Germany and therefore a need of more accurate determination?

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Tanja K. Rausch - Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Inke R. König - Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Wolfgang Göpel - Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e. V. (GMDS), 12. Jahreskongress der Technologie- und Methodenplattform für die vernetzte medizinische Forschung e.V. (TMF). sine loco [digital], 26.-30.09.2021. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2021. DocAbstr. 196

doi: 10.3205/21gmds107, urn:nbn:de:0183-21gmds1079

Published: September 24, 2021

© 2021 Rausch et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Polygenic risk scores for complex diseases are widely used in preclinical and clinical research to stratify individuals according to their genetic risk for targeted prevention, therapy, or prognosis. However, they are usually derived and validated within a specific ethnic background, and translation into other ethnicities has been shown to be problematic. Furthermore, even the transfer between populations in the same country can be challenging, as shown, for instance, for Finland [1] and Great Britain [2].

According to former studies, at least slight genetic differences are present between different parts of Germany [3]. However, the implications for polygenic risk scores have not been evaluated so far. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the impact of geographic regions within Germany on the distribution of polygenic risk scores for common complex diseases.

The German Neonatal Network examines the development of very low birth weight infants with 64 study centers spread across Germany. Umbilical cord tissue frozen after birth is used to genotype the DNA of the infants. Affymetrix AxiomTM Genome-Wide CEU 1 Array Plate 2.0 and Illumina Infinium® Global Screening Array-24 v1.0/v2.0 were used for chip genotyping. Calling, quality control and imputation were done for each platform individually. An additional imputation was done after merging the results of the individual imputations. Finally, unadjusted polygenic risk scores were evaluated.

The continuously growing database currently contains genetic data of 10,259 very low birth weight infants. Within this database, we construct polygenic risk scores for common complex diseases, based on the GWAS [4] and PGS Catalog [5], and compare their distributions between various areas within Germany. Results will provide insight into the transferability of polygenic risk scores between populations but also into the genetic architecture of the investigated traits.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that a positive ethics committee vote has been obtained.


References

1.
Kerminen S, Martin AR, Koskela J, Ruotsalainen SE, Havulinna AS, Surakka I et al. Geographic Variation and Bias in the Polygenic Scores of Complex Diseases and Traits in Finland. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(6):1169-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.001 External link
2.
Haworth S, Mitchell R, Corbin L, Wade KH, Dudding T, Budu-Aggrey A, et al. Apparent latent structure within the UK Biobank sample has implications for epidemiological analysis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:333. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08219-1 External link
3.
Steffens M, Lamina C, Illig T, Bettecken T, Vogler R, Entz P et al. SNP-Based Analysis of Genetic Substructure in the German Population. Hum Hered. 2006;62(1):20-9. DOI: 10.1159/000095850 External link
4.
Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J, Malangone C, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1005-D1012. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1120 External link
5.
Lambert SA, Gil L, Jupp S, Ritchie SC, Xu Y, Buniello A et al. The Polygenic Score Catalog as an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation. Nat Genet. 2021;53:420-5. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00783-5 External link