gms | German Medical Science

Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

14.09. - 16.09.2023, Osnabrück

Development and implementation of the first OSCE on planetary health at the University Hospital Jena

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Max-Johann Sturm - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Jan Giesecke - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Manuel Allwang - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Ida Herzog - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Friederike von Gierke - KLUG – Deutsche Allianz Klimawandel und Gesundheit e.V., Deutschland
  • Sofia Gelashvili - Institut für Kommunikations- und Prüfungsforschung gGmbH, Deutschland
  • Anna Mutschler - Institut für Kommunikations- und Prüfungsforschung gGmbH, Deutschland
  • Ulf Teichgräber - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Thomas Kamradt - Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Fakultät, Deutschland
  • Jana Jünger - Institut für Kommunikations- und Prüfungsforschung gGmbH, Deutschland; Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Med. Fakultät Heidelberg, Studiengang Master of Medical Education, Deutschland

Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Osnabrück, 14.-16.09.2023. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2023. DocP-08-08

doi: 10.3205/23gma271, urn:nbn:de:0183-23gma2713

Published: September 11, 2023

© 2023 Sturm et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Planetary Health (PH) elucidates interactions between our planet, climate change and human health. Healthcare professionals are responsible for around 4,4% of all greenhouse emissions and are a key multiplier in promoting a healthy life on a healthy planet. Hence the AMEE published a consensus statement stressing the relevance of the representation of PH in medical education and assessment [1]. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are frequently used in medical education to evaluate students’ performances objectively on a “show how“- level of the Miller pyramid. If the stations are designed as entrustable professional activities, a formative OSCE examination can support student learning as well as curriculum development [2]. Moreover OSCE Stations can be a part of transformative education [3]. To our knowledge no Planetary Health OSCE has been developed yet. The aim of our study was to test the feasibility of a student-driven implementation of an OSCE at a german faculty.

Methods: We conducted three workshops and a series of review sessions to define the blueprint of the OSCE and to identify subjects which could adopt an OSCE station in their regularly assessment. Our PH-OSCE consists out of 8 OSCE Stations (10 minutes each and two minutes audio-feedback) which are conceptualized and reviewed by a multiinstitutional, nationwide group of students and experts. Stations focus on different aspects of PH and are linked to all CAN-Med-Roles according to a predefined blueprint. The interdisciplinary approach of the construction of the stations itself stimulated PH-education and curriculum development, identifying learning units where specific aspects of PH, e.g. heat-related diseases or counseling of patients for a PH-diet can be integrated. Students will receive expert audio-feedback and individual feedback to the performance through a partner student, who will serve as “a supporting shadower”.

An outcome-based approach seems to be suitable for consensus building between experts of different specialities, NGOs and student groups. Strong student involvement and leadership in the developing and implementation the first OSCE on PH as well as integrating students as examiners in a transparent process seem to be factors of success.


References

1.
Shaw E, Walpole S, McLean M, Alvarez-Nieto C, Barna S, Bazin K, Behrens G, Chase H, Duane B, El Omrani O, Elf M, Faerron Guzmán CA, Falceto de Barros E, Gibbs TJ, Groome J, Hackett F, Hareden J, Hothersall EJ, Hourihane M, Huss NM, Ikiugu M, Joury E, Leedham-Green K, MacKenzie-Shalders K, Madden DL, McKimm J, Schwerdtle PNk, Peters S, Redvers N, Sheffield P, Singleton J, Tun SY, Wollard R. AMEE Consensus Statement: Planetary health and education for sustainable healthcare. Med Teach. 2021;43(3):272-286. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1860207 External link
2.
Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478-485. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828 External link
3.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimashaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5 External link