gms | German Medical Science

Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA)

19.09. - 22.09.2018, Wien, Österreich

Creating a culture of life-long learning that is not exclusively based on self-judgment

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • presenting/speaker K. Eva - The University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Vancouver/BC, Canada

Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Wien, 19.-22.09.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. DocKW04

doi: 10.3205/18gma009, urn:nbn:de:0183-18gma0096

Published: September 19, 2018

© 2018 Eva.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Problem/Learning Goal: Self-directed learning and self-regulation are long-standing pillars of the medical profession. Being able to regulate one’s practice has been argued to depend upon accurate self-assessment with the responsibility for “keeping up to date” resting ultimately with the individual practitioner. Unfortunately, adherence to these axioms persists despite considerable evidence that self-assessment generally offers a poor proxy for actual ability. The discourse of self-assessment supports viewing it not solely as an individual cognitive activity but also as a social activity (i.e., a formative, facilitated, “directed” activity influenced by external resources). As such, self-assessment activities can be more or less valuable for particular purposes in particular contexts. These perspectives have led us to propose prioritization of “directed self-assessment”, a term used to describe self-assessment activities informed by external resources. Research suggests it is an externally supported reflective assessment process that is influenced by context and culture.

There is, however, not a clear understanding of the activities and influences involved in directed self-assessment and understanding of best practices continues to evolve. The purpose of this workshop will be to explore the use of “directed” self-assessment across the continuum of authentic training and practice settings. Through participation, participants will

1.
Discuss the evidence from various literatures in an effort to come to a rich understanding of the concept of directed self-assessment, its flaws and strengths
2.
Explore with their peers the ways in which directed self-assessment has been used to good effect
3.
Consider how to further move the field towards a positive culture of directed self-assessment for professional practice, faculty development, and teaching/learning.

Approach: This workshop will involve a brief didactic presentation and considerable amounts of peer-to-peer learning facilitated by the consideration and discussion of a variety of cases in which self-assessment has proven challenging.

Who Should Participate? Any health professional educator charged with supporting trainees who might be struggling to gain insight into the strengths/limits of their abilities. Any health professional educator with an interest in supporting a culture of continuing professional development and accountability.

Prepare/Bring to Workshop: Enthusiasm and thoughts about particular instances in which you or your trainees have been surprised by the disconnect between one’s impressions of their own performance and those formed by others.


References

1.
Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl.):S46-S54. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00015 External link
2.
Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011;86(9):1120-1127. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226abdd External link
3.
Eva KW, Regehr G. Effective feedback for maintenance of competence: From data delivery to trusting dialogues. CMAJ. 2013;185(6):463-464. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121772 External link