gms | German Medical Science

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR)

15.04. - 17.04.2019, Berlin

Return to work: with wellbeing or work-coping? Randomized controlled group intervention with persons suffering from work-anxieties

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Beate Muschalla - TU Brauschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
  • Michael Jöbges - Brandenburgklinik, Bernau, Germany

15th Congress of the European Forum for Research in Rehabilitation (EFRR). Berlin, 15.-17.04.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc045

doi: 10.3205/19efrr045, urn:nbn:de:0183-19efrr0456

Published: April 16, 2019

© 2019 Muschalla et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: Work-anxieties are associated with sick-leave and make high costs for companies and affected employees. Work-anxieties require specific diagnostic and interventions. We evaluated a short “work-anxiety-coping-group” (WAG).

Aim: We tested experimentally whether the exposition-oriented group (WAG) lead to shorter sick-leave-durations after treatment than a group focused on wellbeing and relaxation (“wellbeing-group” WG).

Method: 1619 employees who were presently in rehabilitation (with the aim of illness recovery and vocational reintegration) were investigated for work-anxieties.

389 persons with work-anxiety were randomly assigned to either WAG or WG. In the beginning and in the end of rehabilitation, general symptom load, work-anxiety, work-coping were measured. From 254 persons the duration of sick leave after the rehabilitation could be assessed.

Results/findings: Persons with work-anxiety (without other mental health problems) who participated in the WAG had a shorter sick leave duration after rehabilitation than persons with work-anxiety from the WG.

In participants with work-anxiety and additional mental health problems there was no difference between the two groups.

When the intervention was longer (six instead of four sessions), the WG-participants perceived a loss of work-coping.

Discussion and conclusions: Early work-oriented interventions are necessary for preventing loss of work-coping. Future research should investigate whether longer duration of interventions may lead to shorter sick-leave in persons with both work-anxiety and additional mental health problems. This is the first RCT for treatment of work-anxieties. This study contained persons with different somatic illnesses, which also influence return-to-work. Research on (work-anxiety-prevention) interventions at work is needed.


References

1.
Muschalla B. Work-anxiety coping intervention improves work-coping perception while a recreational intervention leads to deterioration: Results from a randomized controlled trial. EJWOP. 2017;26:858-69.