gms | German Medical Science

German Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DKOU 2021)

26. - 29.10.2021, Berlin

Differences in endochondral fracture healing between female and male C57BL/6J mice

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Melanie Haffner-Luntzer - Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • Verena Fischer - Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • Anita Ignatius - Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2021). Berlin, 26.-29.10.2021. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2021. DocAB34-336

doi: 10.3205/21dkou170, urn:nbn:de:0183-21dkou1704

Published: October 26, 2021

© 2021 Haffner-Luntzer et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objectives: Mice are increasingly used in fracture healing research because of the opportunity to use transgenic animals. While both, male and female mice are employed, there is no consensus in the literature whether fracture healing differs between both sexes and if data from both sexes could be pooled together. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the similarities and differences in endochondral fracture healing between female and male C57BL/6J mice, since this mouse strain is mainly used in bone research.

Methods: For that purpose, 12-week-old female (17-20 g body weight) and male C57BL/6J mice (22-26 g body weight) received a standardized femur midshaft osteotomy stabilised by an external fixator. Mice were euthanized 10 and 21 days after fracture and bone healing was analysed by biomechanical testing, µCT, histology, immunohistochemistry and qPCR. n=6-8 per group and time point. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test (GraphPad Prism 9). The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

Results and Conclusion: Ten days after fracture, male mice displayed significantly more cartilage but less fibrous tissue in the fracture callus compared to female mice, whereas the amount of bone and the total callus area did not differ. At day 21, male mice showed a significantly larger fracture callus compared to female mice. The relative amount of bone in the fracture callus did not significantly differ between both sexes, whereas its tissue mineral density was significantly higher in male mice on day 21, indicating more mature bone and a faster fracture healing. These results were confirmed by a significantly greater absolute bending stiffness of the fractured femurs of male mice on day 21. On the molecular level, male mice displayed increased active beta-catenin expression in the fracture callus, whereas estrogen receptor alpha (ERa) gene and protein expression was lower on day ten after fracture.

These results suggest that male mice display more rapid fracture healing with more prominent cartilaginous callus formation. This might be due to the higher weight of male mice, resulting in increased mechanical loading of the fracture. Furthermore, male mice displayed significantly greater activation of osteoanabolic Wnt/beta-catenin signalling, which might also contribute to more rapid bone regeneration. Our study proves that data from both sexes should never be pooled together in fracture healing research.