gms | German Medical Science

68th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)
7th Joint Meeting with the British Neurosurgical Society (SBNS)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

14 - 17 May 2017, Magdeburg

Clival and craniocervical chrodoma: high efficacy of the endonasal approach

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Jens Lehmberg - Klinikum rechts der Isar TU München , München, Deutschland
  • Ehab Shiban - Klinikum rechts der Isar TU München , München, Deutschland
  • Bernhard Meyer - Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Society of British Neurological Surgeons. 68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 7. Joint Meeting mit der Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS). Magdeburg, 14.-17.05.2017. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2017. DocMi.05.05

doi: 10.3205/17dgnc391, urn:nbn:de:0183-17dgnc3910

Published: June 9, 2017

© 2017 Lehmberg et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Clival and craniocervical chordomas are slow growing but clinically malignant neoplasms. The proximity of these tumors to vital structures may allow a gross total resection but virtually never a free margin. Therefore, we hypothesized, that patients would benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy, preferentially protons or ions, even if gross total resection was achieved. A small series is presented in which this clinical practice was implemented.

Methods: Between 2006 and 2016, 15 patients (10 female/5 male, median age 52y, range 19/79) with clivul and craniocervical chordomas underwent 25 resections. 9 of these patients presented with double vision due to abducens or oculomotor palsy, 1 with deterioration of visual acuity and field as well as pituitary insufficiency, 1 with nasal obstruction, 2 with unilateral palsy of the caudal cranial nerves and craniocervical instability, 1 with vertigo, 1 incidental. 3 patients were biopsied before. The maximal tumor diameter ranged from 14 to 72 mm. A pure endoscopic transnasal approach was primarily applied, in 1 patient an anterior cervical approach was added. 7 patients received proton beam, 4 heavy ions, 2 photon, 1 none, 1 scheduled for protons.

Results: Gross total resection was achieved in 13 and subtotal resection in 2 cases during primary surgery. 8/8 abducens and 1/1 oculomotor palsies resolved, visual acuity and field improved and pituitary insufficiency remained, breathing improved, caudal cranial nerve palsies remained unchanged, neck pain resolved after dorsal craniocervical fusion. In 1 patient, aggravation from caudal CN palsy to plegia was encountered. One patient complains prolonged nasal discomfort with crusting. 1 patient died due to mayor head trauma after second resection of a regrowth and second radiation. The remaining are progression free after a median follow-up of 56 months, range 2-121. 2 patients presented with irradiation induced necrosis of the mesial temporal lobe, 1 was surgically excised. 1 patient developed a probably radiation induced sarcoma of the condyle/petrous bone and died 6 months after its diagnosis.

Conclusion: The low mortality rate of 2/15 after a median follow-up of 52 months allows the recommendation for radiation following radical surgery. But all effective therapy has morbidity, 1 surgically induced caudal CN palsy, and radiation induced 1 sarcoma and 2 temporal necrosis.