Article
Out of programme experience in UK neurosurgery trainees – optimising the transition back into clinical practice
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | June 9, 2017 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objectives: Out of programme (OOP) experience from training increases the skill pool of the neurosurgical workforce and drives innovation in the specialty. OOP approval criteria are well defined but transition back to clinical work can be challenging with little data published on perspectives of OOP neurosurgical trainees on their experience.
Methods: We undertook an online anonymised survey of neurosurgery doctors in the UK to understand factors influencing transition from OOP back to clinical work.
Results: Out of 70 respondents, 7 are currently on OOP and 26 completed OOP. OOP was most commonly taken at registrar level (28/32), used for research (27/32) and motivated by the aspiration of an academic neurosurgery career (18/32). All current OOP respondents have established funding, versus (10/25) of past OOP trainees. 2/7 of current OOP respondents have a formal return to work plan versus 5/25 of past OOP trainees. Post OOP, 10/25 reported deterioration of surgical skills. 21/25 have applied the skills learned during OOP to their clinical practice
Conclusions: Skills learned during OOP are relevant and transferable in the clinical environment but mainly limited to research with management and education OOP under-represented. Deterioration of surgical skills is a concern. Formal return to work plans are becoming more commonplace but require refinement and tailoring to individual training requirement in order to optimise an effective return to clinical work