Article
Common data elements in degenerative cervical myelopathy (CODE-DCM): Identifying the patient and carer perspective
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | June 9, 2017 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objective: Effective inter-study comparison of treatment studies for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is limited by variable outcome reporting [1]. CODE-DCM is a consensus process aiming to standardise this. This sub-project aimed to identify the outcomes from a patient and carer perspective.
Methods: Using the Delphi process, DCM patients (N=5) and their carers (N=4) were interviewed about the impact of the condition on patients. Results from the systematic reviews [1] and patient research priorities [2] were disseminated, and further discussion recorded. The groups were merged, results shared and categorised by mutual agreement.
Results: 41 effects were reported by patients and 11 by carers. These were categorised into: arm/leg function (P 22; C 27), immobility (P 20; C 0), pain (P 17; C 9), psychosocial (P 12; C 18), sleep (P 10; C 9), genitourinary issues (P 7; C 18), sensation (P 5; C 0), symptom variability (P 5; C 18), and breathing (P 2; C 0). (P x; C y: % of effects reported by patients and carers in each domain).
Conclusion: DCM affects both patients and their carers in a variety of ways. Symptom variability, breathing and sleep are not currently measured in DCM treatment studies. This now needs to be validated in a larger cohort.
References
- 1.
- Davies BM, McHugh M, Elgheriani A, Kolias AG, Tetreault LA, Hutchinson PJ, Fehlings MG, Kotter MR. Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0157263. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157263
- 2.
- Davies BM, et al. What are the research priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy? In: SBNS Autumn Meeting 2016