gms | German Medical Science

68th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)
7th Joint Meeting with the British Neurosurgical Society (SBNS)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

14 - 17 May 2017, Magdeburg

Correlating severity of Moyamoya Disease on cerebral angiography and MRI with H215O-PET

Meeting Abstract

  • Constantin Roder - Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Florian Ebner - Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Alfred Buck - Universitätsspital Zürich, Nuklearmedizin, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Philipp Meyer - Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
  • Ulrike Ernemann - Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department Radiologie, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Marcos Tatagiba - Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Nadia Khan - Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kinderspital Zürich, Tübingen, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Society of British Neurological Surgeons. 68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 7. Joint Meeting mit der Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS). Magdeburg, 14.-17.05.2017. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2017. DocMO.05.06

doi: 10.3205/17dgnc029, urn:nbn:de:0183-17dgnc0294

Published: June 9, 2017

© 2017 Roder et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Moyamoya angiopathy is a stenoocclusive disease with a progressive spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis resulting commonly in ischemic strokes. While conventional cerebral angiography and MRI is a standard in the diagnostic cascade of most treatment centers, functional imaging such as H215O-Positron emission tomography (PET) with acetazolamide challenge is not used routinely. We evaluated the correlation of severity of moyamoya disease on cerebral angiography and MRI with H215O-PET (Baseline and acetazolamide challenge) in the evaluation of surgical indication and planning.

Methods: We analyzed imaging data of adult Moyamoya patients who underwent treatment in our center between 2013-2016. All patients with a complete diagnostic imaging data set (MRI, 6-vessel cerebral angiography, H215O-PET with acetazolamide challenge) before a possible surgical intervention were included. Patients were anonymized and each imaging modality was analyzed separately by a single physician blinded to their identity using a scoring system for severity of disease in each hemisphere and arterial territory. MRI scoring included cortical, subcortical and watershed strokes; stenosis/occlusion of each major artery as well as the presence/absence of collaterals were scored on angiography; and a scoring of the baseline cerebral perfusion and reactivity to acetazolamide was used for H215O-PET. The scores of the three diagnostic imaging were then correlated.

Results: Twenty one adult patients (18 with bilateral Moyamoya disease, 3 with unilateral Moyamoya angiopathy) with 39 affected hemispheres were studied. PET and angiography correlated well in 31/39 (79%) hemispheres, but not in 8/39 (21%). In patients with good collateralization from deep MM collaterals and/or the PCA or ACA into the ACA and/or MCA territory, sufficient acetazolamide reactivity was seen in PET in 5/27 (19%), in patients with partial collateralization in 4/20 (20%) vascular territories. In case of absent collateralization on angiography, acetazolamide reactivity was sufficient in 12/37 (32%) vascular territories. There was no correlation between MRI and reserve capacity in PET.

Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates that functional perfusion imaging should be obligatory in the treatment of patients with Moyamoya. Absence of functional perfusion imaging such as H215O-PET might lead to wrong treatment decisions in 21% of all hemispheres with stenosis/occlusion present on angiography. Visualizing angiographic collateralization alone might give an incorrect impression on the true perfusion reserves in 89% of all territories. The results show that treatment decision should not be based on the results of angiography and MRI alone.