gms | German Medical Science

66th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting with the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

7 - 10 June 2015, Karlsruhe

Cervical corpectomies: Results of a survey on diagnosis, indications and surgical technique

Meeting Abstract

  • Sebastian Hartmann - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • Anja Tschugg - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • Sabrina Neururer - Klinik für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Gesundheitsökonomie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • Jochen Obernauer - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • Ondra Petr - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
  • Claudius Thomé - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocMO.10.01

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc047, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc0478

Published: June 2, 2015

© 2015 Hartmann et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Although cervical corpectomies are increasingly used, there is a paucity of evidence-based data on the indications, surgical approaches and complications of these procedures. Thus, a survey on the diagnosis, indications, surgical planning and complications of cervical corpectomies was conducted to elucidate treatment strategies of spine surgeons in central Europe. Special attention was given to the preoperative planning and the decision making for additive dorsal approaches in multilevel cases.

Method: An online survey consisting of eighteen questions on the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management of cervical corpectomies was prepared. A total of 1137 contacts of surgeons were provided by the "German Society of Spine Surgeons" (DWG), "German Society of Neurosurgeons" (DGNC), "Austrian Spine Society" (ASS) and the "Austrian Society of Neurosurgeons" (OEGNC).

Results: 302 (27%) surgeons attended the survey and demonstrated the wide variability of treatment options. The majority (51%) perform less than 5 anterior cervical corpectomies and fusion (ACCF) procedures per year followed by 35% performing 5 to 20 cases per year. 41% of the participants prefer ACDF over laminoplasty / laminectomy (19%, 16%, respectively) and ACCF (12%). The most common indication for ACCF is represented by degenerative (27%), traumatic (17%) or neoplastic (20%) diseases. Intra- and postoperative complications were mainly associated with hardware failure. Intra- and postoperative complications were mainly found to be implant-associated. To increase the stability of the construct, 33% of the specialists tend do perform a second additive dorsal approach for either 2- or 3-level corpectomies.

Conclusions: Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of complex cervical disease and the use of cervical corpectomies in central Europe. Overall, the procedure is still rarely performed and the need for additional dorsal fixation is unclear in the community. Further studies should investigate this patient population to establish standards in patient care.