gms | German Medical Science

64th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

26 - 29 May 2013, Düsseldorf

A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated outcome after two types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy (ACDF) versus corpectomy (ACCF)

Meeting Abstract

  • Jan-Karl Burkhardt - Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie / Neurochirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Tamas F. Fekete - Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie / Neurochirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Dezsö Jeszenszky - Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie / Neurochirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Anne F. Mannion - Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie / Neurochirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Francois Porchet - Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie / Neurochirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Düsseldorf, 26.-29.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. DocMI.01.03

doi: 10.3205/13dgnc285, urn:nbn:de:0183-13dgnc2857

Published: May 21, 2013

© 2013 Burkhardt et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Objective: Several decompressive techniques are used in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, there is currently no evidence for the superiority of any one over another in terms of patient-rated outcomes. This comparative effectiveness study compared the outcomes of two types of decompression with fusion: anterior cervical discectomy (ACDF) and corpectomy (ACCF).

Method: The single center study was nested within the Eurospine Spine Tango data acquisition system. Inclusion criteria: consecutive patients between 2004–2011 presented with signs of myelopathy who underwent anterior cervical decompression with fusion due to degenerative stenosis for > 1 level. FU ≥12 mo. Before and 12 mo after surgery, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; scored 0–10). At 12 mo FU, they also rated global treatment outcome (how much the operation had helped) and satisfaction with care on 5-point Likert scales.

Results: 100 ACDF and 65 ACCF patients met the inclusion criteria: age, gender, comorbidity and number of levels operated were not significantly different between the groups (p >0.05). Overall, baseline symptoms, function and quality of life tended to be worse in the ACDF group, significantly so for pain (p <0.05). Operation duration and blood loss were significantly lower in the ACDF group (p <0.05). Surgical complications were 10% in ACDF and 5% in ACCF (p=0.31). The 12-month questionnaire follow-up rate was 94%. All the patient-rated outcomes were slightly but not significantly better in ACDF than ACCF: respectively, 83.7% and 73.3% had a good global outcome (op helped/helped a lot) (p = 0.12)); 89.1% and 83.3% were satisfied/very satisfied with care (p = 0.30) and the reduction in the multidimensional COMI after 12 mo was 3.0 ± 2.7 and 2.1 ± 2.9 points (p = 0.07).

Conclusions: The worse baseline status of patients in the ACDF group may reflect the higher proportion of radicular symptoms (pain/neurologic deficits) compared with the ACCF group, for whom myelopathy (diffuse, neurological symptoms; less pain) is the predominant clinical picture. Similarly good patient-orientated outcomes after 1 year were shown for the two different surgical techniques; this precludes any conclusions regarding the superiority of one technique over the other, though it should be borne in mind that ACDF required a shorter surgery and was associated with less blood loss.