gms | German Medical Science

64th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

26 - 29 May 2013, Düsseldorf

Qualified DRG-controlling makes a difference

Meeting Abstract

  • Ruth Albert - Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Regensburg
  • Martin Proescholdt - Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Regensburg
  • Karl-Michael Schebesch - Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Regensburg
  • Alexander Brawanski - Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Regensburg
  • Max Lange - Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Regensburg

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Düsseldorf, 26.-29.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. DocMO.15.01

doi: 10.3205/13dgnc126, urn:nbn:de:0183-13dgnc1264

Published: May 21, 2013

© 2013 Albert et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Objective: Financial resources of today's medical practice are profoundly limited. To regulate the reimbursement process, the DRG system (Diagnosis Related Groups) has been stipulated in Germany in January 2004. It is an economic and medical system to classify hospital cases into groups based on diagnoses and procedures. Essential for adequate reimbursement is a complete acquisition of diagnoses, procedures, complications and comorbidities. Representatives of the health insurance regularly audit relevant diagnoses or procedures on site. To match the increasing challenges of this complex system, our department has recently recruited a board certified neurosurgeon for a part-time position as DRG controller The goal of our study was to demonstrate the impact of this management executive on the reimbursement rate and financial balancing of a academic neurosurgey department.

Method: Since June 2009 a 50 % part-time position is assigned to a board certified neurosurgeon being responsible for financial controlling. This includes both coding of all cases and vindicating the financial claims towards the health insurances. In addition hospitalization and in-patient treatment has been optimized with regard to length of stay. We compared the first two years of professional coding to the last two years before concerning number of cases, length of stay, number of secondary diagnoses, number of procedures, case mix index (CMI) and health insurances' reclaims.

Results: The quantity of secondary diagnoses per case (2007: Ø 2,9; 2008: Ø 2,6; 2009: Ø 3,6; 2010: Ø 4,9 ; 2011: Ø 6,0) and quantity of procedures per case (2007: Ø 8,5; 2008: Ø 8,9; 2009: Ø 8,8 ; 2010: Ø 9,7 ; 2011: Ø 9,4) increased and the CMI boosted from 2,35 in the year 2007 to currently 3,215. Nevertheless the number of cases (2007-2011: Ø 1586 cases/year) and length of stay (2007-2011: Ø 10,6 days) remained stable. The verifications of the health insurance resulted in an evident improvement, as well: cost weight points (CW) won: 64,95 % in 2008, 78,20% in 2009, and 94,17% in 2010. This means that 863.481,47 € could be retained out of health insurance reclaims of 916.912,96 € in 2010.

Conclusions: Although number of cases and length of stay were constant complete acquisition of relevant parameters resulted in an increasement of CMI. Hence, the investment in a neurosurgically qualified DRG controller is profitable, also with regard of health insurance demands.