gms | German Medical Science

3rd International Conference of the German Society of Midwifery Science (DGHWi)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e.V.

12.02.2016, Fulda

Training profile in outpatient midwifery care: Experiences and future perspectives from the point of view of self-employed midwives

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

German Association of Midwifery Science. 3rd International Meeting of the German Association of Midwifery Science (DGHWi). Fulda, 12.-12.02.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc16dghwiP10

doi: 10.3205/16dghwi14, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dghwi147

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dghwi2016/16dghwi14.shtml

Published: February 5, 2016

© 2016 Scholz.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: The challenges of midwifery are increasingly subject to change and the duties of a midwife are shifting to outpatient midwifery care, among other things. Various studies conducted in Germany confirm that practical training in outpatient midwifery (so-called externships – Externate) as well as clinical and theoretical training need to be adapted to such new challenges [1][2][3]. Stone concludes that it is fundamental to master “low-intervention” childbirth, stating that this is not ensured at conditions prevailing in Germany [4].

Method: The objective of the research at hand is to gain insight on the experiences of midwives and to know their assessment of such externships. To this end, a qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted, where seven self-employed midwives commanding experience in outpatient midwifery education were interviewed by means of a partly standardized interview guideline. These expert interviews were evaluated according to Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. Based on the summary, categories were formed and then reduced in two stages; what remained was a corpus that illustrated the base material.

Findings: The following categories may be stated as key findings:

1.
Aside from technical expertise, the midwives describe the formation of personal and social skills as the vital basis for providing midwifery care on a self-employed basis.
2.
The midwives give varied descriptions of the manner in which midwives to be can learn how to perform these activities. A major distinction is made between ‘taking on’ and ‘observing’ activities. All of the midwives are pointing out that observing activities is crucial.
3.
All of the interviewed midwives are quite motivated to provide training for midwives to be.
4.
All of the interviewed midwives describe the time frame of externships as being too short to gather sufficient experience in outpatient midwifery care.
5.
The midwives deem professional practical tutelage important for proper education and express their willingness to take further training, themselves. The questioned midwives request pecuniary appreciation of qualitatively demanding training services.

Recommendations for practice: In order to adjust practical training in outpatient midwifery care to current requirements, externships need to be extended and the ‘maximum period of externships’ set forth in the Act on Midwifery should be repealed. Specific training profiles should be defined and practical qualification of trainers should be ensured. Usable findings for developing such training profiles are already available in existing research and in this paper. The strong motivation on the part of the midwives can be utilised as an opportunity for implementation. However, pecuniary appreciation of the trainers should be implemented in order to ensure proper training in the long term.

On the basis of the findings of this study the author designed a “model-externship” in cooperation with the midwifery school in Hannover which she carries out from May to December 2015. The experiences of the student and the practical trainer/ author will be presented in a single case study.


References

1.
zu Sayn-Wittgenstein F, Hrsg. Geburtshilfe neu denken. Bericht zur Situation und Zukunft des Hebammenwesens in Deutschland. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag; 2007.
2.
Zoege M. Die Professionalisierung des Hebammenberufes. Anforderungen an die Ausbildung. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag; 2004.
3.
Pehlke-Milde J. Ein Kompetenzprofil für die Hebammenausbildung: Grundlage einer lernergebnisorientierten Curriculumsentwicklung. Institut für Medizin-, Pflegepädagogik und Pflegewissenschaft der Medizinischen Fakultät Charité [Dissertation]. Universität Berlin; 2009.
4.
Stone N. Making physiological birth possible: Birth at a free-standing birth centre in Berlin. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):568-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.04.005 External link