gms | German Medical Science

GMS Hygiene and Infection Control

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene (DGKH)

ISSN 2196-5226

Hygiene and disinfection measures for monkeypox virus infections

Hygiene- und Desinfektionsmaßnahmen bei Infektionen mit Affenpockenviren

Recommendation

  • corresponding author Maren Eggers - Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH), Bonn, Germany; Society of Virology (GfV), Heidelberg, Germany; Disinfectant Commission of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases e.V. (DVV), Kiel, Germany; Labor Prof. Gisela Enders MVZ GbR, Stuttgart, Germany
  • Martin Exner - Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH), Bonn, Germany; German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH), Berlin, Germany; University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • Jürgen Gebel - Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH), Bonn, Germany; University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • Carola Ilschner - Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH), Bonn, Germany; University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • Holger F. Rabenau - Society of Virology (GfV), Heidelberg, Germany; Disinfectant Commission of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases e.V. (DVV), Kiel, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany
  • Ingeborg Schwebke - Society of Virology (GfV), Heidelberg, Germany; Disinfectant Commission of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases e.V. (DVV), Kiel, Germany

GMS Hyg Infect Control 2022;17:Doc18

doi: 10.3205/dgkh000421, urn:nbn:de:0183-dgkh0004219

Published: October 17, 2022

© 2022 Eggers et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

In Germany, recommendations on infection prevention and control of current virus outbreaks are given as communications by the Association for Applied Hygiene e.V. (VAH) together with the joint Disinfectant Commission of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases e.V. (DVV) and the Society of Virology* (GfV). The DVV was founded in 1954 in response to the ongoing threat to the population from polio and was given its current name in 1977. The DVV is supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, the Ministries of Health of the Federal States, scientific societies, as well as social foundations and organisations. Private individuals cannot be members of the DVV. The Society of Virology e.V. (GfV) is a scientific society for all virological fields in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and is thus the largest virological society in Europe. With numerous commissions, guidelines and statements, it is the authoritative contact for research, healthcare and politics. The joint commission “Virus Disinfection” of these scientific societies focuses on the efficacy of chemical disinfection procedures against viruses. The VAH bundles the expertise of scientific societies and experts on infection prevention and is particularly committed to the quality assurance of hygiene measures. With the VAH disinfectant list, the association provides the standard reference for the selection of high-quality disinfection procedures. This disinfectant list has a tradition of more than 60 years in Germany.

The original German version of this document was published in August 2022 and has now been made available to the international professional public in English. The document contains recommendations on hygiene and disinfection measures for monkeypox virus infections. Disinfectants against monkeypox must have at least proven efficacy against enveloped viruses (active against enveloped viruses); products with the efficacy ranges “limited virucidal activity” and “virucidal” can also be used. The disinfectant list of the VAH or the disinfectant list of the Robert Koch Institute are available for the selection of products. Especially in the case of contamination with crust or scab material, it should be noted that protein contamination can have a protective or stabilising effect on monkeypox. Therefore, cleaning – before disinfection – should always be carried out in this situation. Preventive measures such as vaccination and hygiene in the vicinity of people with monkeypox must be taken to prevent transmission to small children, pregnant women or people with a pronounced immune deficiency.

Keywords: monkeypox, infection prevention and control, disinfection, hygiene, health care

Zusammenfassung

In Deutschland geben der Verbund für angewandte Hygiene e.V. (VAH) zusammen mit der Kommission „Virusdesinfektion“ der Deutschen Vereinigung zur Bekämpfung der Viruskrankheiten e.V. (DVV) und der Gesellschaft für Virologie e.V. (GfV) Mitteilungen und Empfehlungen zu durch Viren übertragbare Krankheiten heraus. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf wirksamen Hygiene- und Desinfektionsmaßnahmen zur Prävention und Kontrolle bei gehäuftem Auftreten von Virusinfektionen. Die DVV wurde 1954 als Reaktion auf die andauernde Gefährdung der Bevölkerung durch die Poliomyelitis gegründet und erhielt 1977 ihren heutigen Namen. Die DVV wird vom Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, den Gesundheitsministerien der Bundesländer, wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften sowie sozial engagierten Stiftungen und Organisationen getragen. Einzelpersonen können nicht Mitglied der DVV sein. Die Gesellschaft für Virologie e.V. (GfV) ist eine Fachgesellschaft für alle virologischen Fachgebiete in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz und damit die größte virologische Fachgesellschaft in Europa. Mit zahlreichen Kommissionen, Leitlinien und Stellungnahmen ist sie zu virologischen Themen der maßgebende Ansprechpartner für Forschung, Gesundheitswesen und Politik. Die gemeinsame Kommission „Virusdesinfektion“ dieser Fachgesellschaften nimmt die Wirksamkeit chemischer Desinfektionsverfahren gegenüber Viren in den Fokus. Der VAH bündelt die Expertise von Fachgesellschaften und Fachleuten zur Infektionsprävention und setzt sich insbesondere für die Qualitätssicherung von Hygienemaßnahmen ein. Mit der Desinfektionsmittel-Liste des VAH gibt der Verbund die Standardreferenz zur Auswahl von qualitativ hochwertigen Desinfektionsverfahren heraus. Diese Desinfektionsmittel-Liste hat in Deutschland eine mehr als 60jährige Tradition.

Die deutsche Originalfassung des vorliegenden Übersichtsartikels zur aktuellen Situation der Affenpocken wurde im August 2022 veröffentlicht und wird jetzt auf Englisch der internationalen Fachöffentlichkeit zur Verfügung gestellt. Der Artikel enthält Empfehlungen zu Hygiene- und Desinfektionsmaßnahmen bei Infektionen mit Affenpocken-Viren. Desinfektionsmittel gegen Affenpocken-Viren müssen mindestens eine nachgewiesene Wirksamkeit gegen behüllte Viren

(„begrenzt viruzid“) aufweisen; Produkte mit den Wirkbereichen „begrenzt viruzid PLUS“ und „viruzid“ können ebenfalls verwendet werden. Zur Auswahl von Produkten stehen die Desinfektionsmittel-Liste des VAH oder die Desinfektionsmittel-Liste des Robert Koch-Instituts zur Verfügung. Besonders bei Verunreinigungen mit Krusten- oder Schorfmaterial ist zu beachten, dass die Proteinbelastung eine schützende bzw. stabilisierende Wirkung auf Affenpocken haben kann. Daher ist hier stets eine gründliche Reinigung – vor der Desinfektion – durchzuführen. Durch Präventivmaßnahmen wie Impfungen und Hygieneverhalten gilt es, im Umfeld von an Affenpocken erkrankten Personen, Übertragungen auf Kleinkinder, Schwangere oder Personen mit einer ausgeprägten Immundefizienz zu verhindern.

Schlüsselwörter: Affenpocken, Infektionsprävention und -bekämpfung, Desinfektion, Hygiene, Gesundheitsfürsorge


1 Introduction

Monkeypox is a zoonotic viral disease caused by infection with the monkeypox virus. This is an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus and belongs to the genus of orthopoxviruses of the Poxviridae family. The genus of orthopoxviruses also includes, among others, the variola virus (causative agent of smallpox), the vaccinia virus, the horsepox virus and the cowpox virus (Figure 1 [Fig. 1]).

At the end of the 18th century, the English doctor Edward Jenner used cowpox lymph (vaccina, derived from vacca, the cow) as a vaccine for the first time. The procedure called "vaccination" quickly became established. In addition to the variolation of cows or human-to-human vaccination, other animals such as rabbits, pigs, sheep, donkeys, horses and goats were also used as intermediate hosts to improve the effectiveness of the lymph. In fact, vaccines derived from cowpox or horsepox were used interchangeably for smallpox vaccination in the 19th century [1]. The vaccinia virus, whose origin is not entirely clear due to the different intermediate hosts and of which there are four standardised variants, is still used today in a modified form for protection against smallpox (variola virus, monkeypox virus) as well as in research, e.g., as a test virus for testing the efficacy of disinfectants [2].

Monkeypox was first discovered in 1958, when two outbreaks of a smallpox-like disease occurred in (macaque) monkey colonies kept for research purposes. This is where the name “monkeypox” originates. The natural reservoir of monkeypox viruses is still unknown, but they have a broad host range. Antibodies against monkeypox have been detected in various rodent species (red squirrels, sun squirrels, Gambian giant hamster rats and other mouse and rat species), but also in mongooses, guenons and marmosets [3]. The first case of monkeypox in humans was detected in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in 1970, when efforts to eradicate smallpox were intensified. Since then, monkeypox in humans has been described in several other Central and West African countries: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, DRC, Gabon, Liberia, Nigeria, Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone [3], [4]. An increase in cases has been observed since 2017 [5].

Based on sequence analyses of isolates of monkeypox virus, these have so far been divided into two clades (variants): the West African and the Central African viruses. The latter occur mainly in the Congo Basin. Compared to the West African virus strains, which usually cause milder infections, they lead to infections with higher lethality (case fatality rate [CFR]%, i.e., the proportion of fatal courses of a disease: approx. 11 vs. 1%), more severe courses of disease and higher reproductive numbers (R0: 0.8 vs. 0.3). These data come from Africa, and mostly children are affected [3].

Outside Africa, human cases of monkeypox associated with international travel or animal imports have been rare. In 2003, the first major monkeypox outbreak occurred in the U.S. due to the transmission of the virus from infected prairie dogs. The prairie dogs had contracted the virus from animals imported from Gambia with whom they housed in an enclosure. Transmission to humans occurred via both invasive (bites, scratches) and non-invasive contacts (e.g., touching, feeding) [6]. Individual travel-associated case reports have been reported, for instance, from Singapore [7] as well as the US, Israel and the UK [8], [9].


2 Epidemiology of the current outbreak

Since May 6, 2022, 15,734 travel-independent confirmed cases have been reported worldwide (Global Health Mapbox, https://map.monkeypox.global.health/country, as of 22 July 2022). This 2022 outbreak cluster belongs to a new clade 3 identified by genome sequencing, which also includes clade 2 of the West African variant [10].

According to the Pan American Health Organizsation, between January 1 and July 7, 2022, a total of 7,892 confirmed cases were reported (from 63 Member States in 5 of the WHO regions), including 3 deaths (from Nigeria and the Central African Republic). As of July 7, 2022, 82% (6,496 cases in 34 countries) of confirmed cases have been reported in the WHO European Region; 15% (1,184 cases in 14 countries) in the WHO American Region; 2% (173 cases in 8 countries) in the WHO African Region; 1% (24 cases in 4 countries) in the WHO Western Pacific Region; and <1% (15 cases in 3 countries) in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. In the last 7 days [2 to 9 July 2022], there has been a 41.6% increase in reported cases globally. In the same period, there was an 82% increase in the Africa Region, 57% in the Americas Region, and 38% in the Europe Region. Thus, it is a very dynamic event. Globally, 78% of confirmed cases are men aged 18 to 44 years. Overall 98% of cases were identified as men who have sex with men (MSM), and of these, 41% are HIV-positive. Of the cases, 47% reported prior exposure to the disease during social events involving sexual contact. Of the 1,110 cases for which information is available, 113 are healthcare workers. Whether the infection in these cases was caused by occupational exposure is currently being investigated [11].

In Germany, cases have been reported from all federal states [12], [13]; the obligation to report confirmed cases according to §6 and 7 of the Infection Protection Act (IfSG) applies (1,924 cases as of 18 July 2022). Even though the WHO declared the outbreak a “public health emergency of international concern” on 23 July 2022 due to its dynamics, the Robert Koch Institute (as of 25 July 2022) continues to estimate the risk to the general population as low [12].

The WHO has established an Emergency Committee and published recommendations for action to protect public health. It also reported cases of infected children in the United Kingdom, in Spain and France with mild courses [14].


3 Clinical symptomatology

Monkeypox is a rare but potentially serious viral disease that typically begins after an incubation period of 5–21 days with a flu-like illness (initially with fever (>38.3°C), headache, muscle pain and fatigue) and swelling of the lymph nodes (cervical, inguinal) and develops into a rash on the face and body.

The eruptive stage begins with typical enanthema (oropharynx) and exanthema on the face, hands, forearms with centripetal spread over the body and subsequent development of redness and pox-typical uniform efflorescence stages (macules, vesicles, pustules and crusts). This occurs in about 80% of patients within a few days – 20% of sufferers develop polymorphous exanthema– similar to varicella. The lesions heal after drying and desquamation (sometimes with scarring). It was previously assumed that the infectivity lasts from the beginning of the prodromal stage at least until the crust of the skin lesions falls off [15].

People vaccinated against smallpox generally develop fewer efflorescences than non-vaccinated persons. In addition, ulcerations on the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with pharyngitis and tonsillitis, conjunctivitis with eyelid oedema and very painful lesions in the genital area frequently appear in non-vaccinated persons. Rarely, blindness and disfiguring scars occur as permanent damage. Severe, fatal haemorrhagic forms are rare; mild forms with less than 10 pockmarks and subclinical infections are sometimes observed.

Overall, the prognosis can be considered favourable. A higher probability of severe disease and mortality has only been observed in children under 8 years of age in the past [16], [17].

3.1 Clinical symptomatology: specific features of the monkeypox outbreak in 2022 (clade 3)

Recent reports show that the symptomatology of the monkeypox clade 3 diseases now prevalent in Europe differs from earlier descriptions. Symptoms of the prodromal stage are often absent. The skin lesions first appear in the urogenital and anal regions and not on the hands and soles of the feet, as is more common. The lesions were also often at different stages and may have occurred before systemic symptoms. The team of authors of a study published in Lancet Infectious Diseases in July 2022 therefore suggest an adjustment of the case definition [18].

Asymptomatic courses are also reported in a preprint study from Belgium. In anorectal swabs, a positive result could be detected in three (1.3%) of 224 MSM retrospectively tested for monkeypox. All those affected stated that they had not had any symptoms [19].

The possibility of generalised and severe courses in the case of impaired immunity (e.g., infants and young children, patients with immunosuppressive treatment, patients with chronic immunodeficiency, elderly people, pregnant women) should be taken into account. Therefore, it is also important to provide special protection for these population groups.

When reporting vaccination status, it is advisable to record the vaccination status from the vaccination record. A study by Eurosurveillance found that positive vaccination status against smallpox virus was also reported by patients under 40 [20].


4 Transmission routes

Monkeypox virus can be transmitted via different routes, namely animal-to-animal (predominantly different rodent species), animal-to-human, and human-to-human. In addition, the possibility of human-to-animal transmission cannot be ruled out in the case of contact with high virus loads. Monkeys as well as humans are false hosts for the monkeypox virus [21].

4.1 Human-to-human transmission

In human-to-human transmission in the current outbreak, the focus is on direct transmission via close contact with infectious skin lesions (e.g. via ruptured blisters). The blisters and pustules contain high viral loads. Ports of entry are small skin lesions as well as the mucous membranes and the respiratory tract.

In addition, indirect transmission via infectious material (e.g. via bed linen [skin/scab particles], towels, clothing, hand contact surfaces) is possible. Vertical transmission from mother to child has also been described in rare cases [22], [23]. Transmission via larger respiratory droplets after prolonged personal contact seems to play a rather minor role in this outbreak, but may become relevant for prevention measures in the context of major events.

In a hospital in Hamburg, a systematic investigation of the viral load on selected surfaces of two patient rooms with anterooms was carried out on the 4th day of accommodation of monkeypox patients. By means of PCR analysis, it was found that the surfaces of the wet cells close to the patients (water tap, soap dispenser lever, toilet seat) had a particularly high viral load, as did seating surfaces of chairs and the display of the patients’ mobile phones, as well as textiles (pillows, clothing around the anal region) used by the patients. Furthermore, surfaces that were presumably touched by medical staff and thus contaminated, such as cupboard handles, door handles of the anteroom, showed high viral loads. The authors restrictively point out that these are mainly results of a PCR analysis, i.e. viral DNA, and not the cultivation of infectious monkeypox viruses. Interestingly, however, they were able to culture monkeypox virus in three of the samples collected from one patient, namely from the investigator's glove, the operating lever of the soap dispenser and a towel on the patient's bed. All three samples had more than 106 copies per sample (>103 cp/cm2) [24].

The transmission of monkeypox virus via semen, urine, stool, blood and tear fluid has also not yet been conclusively clarified, although positive PCR test results appeared in some of these materials in a recent study [17]. The evidence thickens in an even more recent Spanish study from Barcelona, which shows how frequently the virus is found not only in skin lesions, but also in the throat, urine and semen. The Robert Koch Institute succeeded in cultivating replicable viruses from ejaculate [25]. PCR-positive results were also obtained in stool [26].

The question of air transferability or drift has also not yet been clarified. Therefore, window ventilation should only take place with the door closed (no cross-ventilation).

The longest chains of infection observed so far involved six to nine people [27].


5 Characteristics of monkeypox

Investigations with the vaccinia virus – related to the monkeypox virus – showed that this virus can remain infectious on surfaces for up to 56 days [28]. Stability on textile fibres was also investigated with the vaccinia virus. According to this, the virus could still be cultivated from wool fabric after up to four weeks and from cotton after four to eight days; textiles contaminated with virus-containing dust even remained infectious for up to twelve weeks [29], [30]. The publication by Adler et al. indicates that in some patients the virus could be detected in the throat swab by PCR test for up to three weeks (in one case from 2018 even up to 41 days) after diagnosis [17]. Whether this was only “residual nucleic acid” or infectious virus was not investigated.

The period during which a human being infected with monkeypox is infectious is currently estimated to be up to 4 weeks. The infectious dose of monkeypox virus is not known. In non-human primates, infection could be induced by intrabronchial administration of 5×104 plaque-forming units (PFU), i.e. approx. 50,000 viruses [31]

According to current knowledge, the environmental stability is comparable to that of the vaccinia virus. Monkeypox viruses are very resistant to desiccation and can survive in the crusts of skin lesions for months to years [32].


6 Prevention measures

6.1 Vaccination

In 1980, human smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide and vaccinations against smallpox were discontinued in 1976 in the then FRG and in 1982 in the GDR. Subsequently, the monkeypox virus spread as the most important smallpox virus – apart from cowpox (which was transmitted e.g. via “cuddly rats” kept as pets) – for public health [33], [34], [35].

In the EU, the smallpox vaccine Imvanex is licensed against smallpox, which contains a modified form of the vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) that is no longer able to replicate. In the U.S. and Canada, the approval of this vaccine also extends to vaccination against monkeypox. In the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the review of data on the indication extension of Imvanex has started [36]. According to the recommendation of the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) of 21.6.2022, vaccination with Imvanex (MVA-BN) is currently recommended under certain conditions for post-exposure prophylaxis after monkeypox exposure of asymptomatic persons and as an indication vaccination of persons with an increased risk of exposure and infection [37].

In the meantime, the vaccine is available in the practices in Germany, and vaccinations according to the STIKO recommendations have started. The organisation and vaccination is regulated by the federal states.

6.2 Hygiene measures

The most important non-pharmaceutical preventive measure for the further spread and disease of monkeypox is the avoidance of close contact with an infected person. Patients and also the persons living in the same household with a monkeypox patient should be advised by a doctor and, if possible, trained on which hygiene measures to take and how to carry them out properly (Table 1 [Tab. 1] and Table 2 [Tab. 2]).

6.2.1 Disinfection

Smallpox viruses are enveloped viruses that can be inactivated by disinfectants with proven “virucidal activity against enveloped viruses” [38]. As against SARS-CoV-2, disinfectants with a proven “virucidal activity against enveloped viruses” efficacy are in principle suitable for disinfection. In comparative studies with various enveloped viruses (e.g., hepatitis C virus, Ebola virus, influenza virus, coronavirus), the European test virus vaccinia virus proved to be the most resistant virus [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]. The environmental stability of vaccinia viruses and monkeypox viruses is comparable [44], [45].

Products with the active ranges “limited spectrum of virucidal activity” and “virucidal activity” can also be used [38]. The disinfectant list of the VAH or the disinfectant list of the Robert Koch Institute are available for the selection of products.

With regard to the problem of the stability of the virus, e.g., in skin flakes and crusts, it is important to ensure that the efficacy testing of surface disinfectants under high organic load has been carried out in accordance with the applicable test standards in the practical test in accordance with the requirements and methods for VAH certification of chemical disinfection procedures Annex V [46], [47]. Visibly contaminated near-patient surfaces with skin flakes and skin crusts should be removed in advance with a disposable disinfection wipe, which is then immediately disposed of in the residual waste. Disposable gloves must be worn for all cleaning and disinfection procedures, and hand disinfection must be performed after their use.

The use of disinfectants with the effective range “limited spectrum of virucidal activity” or “virucidal activity” would only be discussed (e.g., for surface disinfection) if, due to their mechanism of action, they could penetrate crusts/scabs and also inactivate the virus inside, if prior efficient cleaning of the surfaces is not possible.

Laundry disinfectants are an exception here, as the European standardisation and also the VAH and RKI lists only specify the virucidal range of action.

If no VAH certificate is available, it is recommended that an evaluation of the test reports and expert opinions submitted by the manufacturer be carried out by independent experts [48], [49].

The criterion for the selection of a disinfectant should not be a specific active ingredient or group of active ingredients, but the manufacturer-independent proof of efficacy for the required spectrum of activity for a specific product.

The importance of laundry preparation, including the preparation of mopping utensils, for instance, for floor cleaning (mops), should be emphasised. Care must be taken that bed linen and body laundry is collected in such a way that, as far as possible, there is no environmental contamination with skin crusts, as the viruses embedded in these are much more difficult for disinfectants to reach. Chemo-thermal reprocessing with a virus-effective, VAH- or RKI-listed procedure is required for laundry reprocessing in the clinical and nursing environment [50].


7 Conclusion

Disinfectants against monkeypox must have at least proven efficacy against enveloped viruses (“active against enveloped viruses”); products with the efficacy ranges “limited virucidal activity” and “virucidal” can also be used. The disinfectant list of the VAH or also the disinfectant list of the Robert Koch Institute are available for the selection of products [51]. Especially in the case of contamination with crust or scab material, it should be noted that protein contamination can have a protective or stabilising effect on monkeypox. Therefore, cleaning before disinfection should always be carried out in this situation. Preventive measures such as vaccination and hygiene in the vicinity of persons with monkeypox must be taken to prevent transmission to small children, pregnant women or persons with a pronounced immune deficiency.


Notes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Citation reference:

This recommendation is also available in German:

Eggers M, Exner M, Gebel J, Ilschner C, Rabenau HF, Schwebke I. Joint communication from VAH and the Virus Disinfection Commission of the DVV and GfV: Wirksamkeit von Desinfektionsmitteln gegen Affenpockenviren. Status 2022 Jul 18. HygMed. 2022;47(7-8):158-64. Available from: https://vah-online.de/de/ and https://g-f-v.org/komissionen/


References

1.
Henig EM, Krafft F. Pockenimpfstoffe in Deutschland. Pharmazeutische Zeitung, PZ online. 1999 Sep 20 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.pharmazeutische-zeitung.de/inhalt-38-1999/titel-38-1999/ External link
2.
Schrick L, Tausch SH, Dabrowski PW, Damaso CR, Esparza J, Nitsche A. An Early American Smallpox Vaccine Based on Horsepox. N Engl J Med. 2017 10;377(15):1491-2. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1707600 External link
3.
Nitsche A, Schrick L, Schaade L. Human monkeypox infections. Aviation and Travel Medicine. 2019;26:18-24. DOI: 10.1055/a-0822-0273 External link
4.
Centres of Disease Control. About Monkeypox. Atlanta, GA: CDC; Updated 2022 Jul 12 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/about.html External link
5.
Bunge EM, Hoet B, Chen L, Lienert F, Weidenthaler H, Baer LR, Steffen R. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox-A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 02;16(2):e0010141. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141 External link
6.
Reynolds MG, Yorita KL, Kuehnert MJ, Davidson WB, Huhn GD, Holman RC, Damon IK. Clinical manifestations of human monkeypox influenced by route of infection. J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep;194(6):773-80. DOI: 10.1086/505880 External link
7.
Yong SEF, Ng OT, Ho ZJM, Mak TM, Marimuthu K, Vasoo S, Yeo TW, Ng YK, Cui L, Ferdous Z, Chia PY, Aw BJW, Manauis CM, Low CKK, Chan G, Peh X, Lim PL, Chow LPA, Chan M, Lee VJM, Lin RTP, Heng MKD, Leo YS. Imported Monkeypox, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 08;26(8):1826-30. DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.191387 External link
8.
WHO. Monkeypox – Key facts. Geneva: WHO; 2022 May 19 [Retrieved 2022 May 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox External link
9.
Centres of Disease Control. Diseases and Outbreaks. Atlanta, GA: CDC; Updated 2022 Jun 6 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/outbreak/us-outbreaks.html External link
10.
Isidro J, Borges V, Pinto M, Sobral D, Santos JD, Nunes A, Mixão V, Ferreira R, Santos D, Duarte S, Vieira L, Borrego MJ, Núncio S, de Carvalho IL, Pelerito A, Cordeiro R, Gomes JP. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nat Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):1569-72. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01907-y External link
11.
Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization. Epidemiological Update: Monkeypox (9 July 2022). Washington, D.C.: PAHO/WHO; 2022 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/documents/epidemiological-update-monkeypox-9-july-2022 External link
12.
Robert Koch Institute. Internationaler Affenpocken-Ausbruch: Fallzahlen und Einschätzung der Situation in Deutschland (2022 Jul 18). Berlin: RKI; 2022 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/A/Affenpocken/Ausbruch-2022-Situation-Deutschland.html External link
13.
Selb R, Werber D, Falkenhorst G, Steffen G, Lachmann R, Ruscher C, McFarland S, Bartel A, Hemmers L, Koppe U, Stark K, Bremer V, Jansen K; Berlin MPX study group. A shift from travel-associated cases to autochthonous transmission with Berlin as epicentre of the monkeypox outbreak in Germany, May to June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jul;27(27). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.27.2200499 External link
14.
WHO. Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the multi-country monkeypox outbreak. Geneva: WHO; 2022 Jun 25 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/25-06-2022-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee--regarding-the-multi-country-monkeypox-outbreak External link
15.
Ng OT, Lee V, Marimuthus K et al. A case of imported monkeypox in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(11):1166. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30537-7 External link
16.
Yinka-Ogunleye A, Aruna O, Dalhat M, et al. Outbreak of humanmonkeypox in Nigeria in 2017-18: a clinical and epidemiological report. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 872-79. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30294-4 External link
17.
Adler H, Gould S, Hine P, Snell LB, Wong W, Houlihan CF, Osborne JC, Rampling T, Beadsworth MB, Duncan CJ, Dunning J, Fletcher TE, Hunter ER, Jacobs M, Khoo SH, Newsholme W, Porter D, Porter RJ, Ratcliffe L, Schmid ML, Semple MG, Tunbridge AJ, Wingfield T, Price NM; NHS England High Consequence Infectious Diseases (Airborne) Network. Clinical features and management of human monkeypox: a retrospective observational study in the UK. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1153-62. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00228-6 External link
18.
Girometti N, Byrne R, Bracchi M, Heskin J, McOwan A, Tittle V, Gedela K, Scott C, Patel S, Gohil J, Nugent D, Suchak T, Dickinson M, Feeney M, Mora-Peris B, Stegmann K, Plaha K, Davies G, Moore LSP, Mughal N, Asboe D, Boffito M, Jones R, Whitlock G. Demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in individuals attending a sexual health centre in London, UK: an observational analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 1:S1473-3099(22)00411-X. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00411-X External link
19.
Baetselier I de, van Dijck C, Kenyon C, Coppens J, van den Bossche D, Smet H, Liesenborghs L, Vanroye F, de Block T, Rezende A, Florence E, Vercauteren K, van Esbroeck M, Ramadan K, Platteau T, van Looveren K, Baeyens J, van Hoyweghen C,Mangelschots M, Coppens S, Heyndrickx L, Michiels J, Brosius I, Ariën KK, van Griensven J, Laga M, Vanhamel J, Vuylsteke B, Bottieau E, Soentjens P, Selhorst P, Berens N, van Henten S, Bracke S, Vanbaelen T, Mauro Rezende A. Asymptomatic monkeypox virus infections among male sexual health clinic attendees in Belgium [Preprint]. medRxiv. 2022 Jul 5. DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.04.22277226 External link
20.
Iñigo Martínez J, Gil Montalbán E, Jiménez Bueno S, Martín Martínez F, Nieto Juliá A, Sánchez Díaz J, García Marín N, Córdoba Deorador E, Nunziata Forte A, Alonso García M, Humanes Navarro AM, Montero Morales L, Domínguez Rodríguez MJ, Carbajo Ariza M, Díaz García LM, Mata Pariente N, Rumayor Zarzuelo M, Velasco Rodríguez MJ, Aragón Peña A, Rodríguez Baena E, Miguel Benito Á, Pérez Meixeira A, Ordobás Gavín M, Lopaz Pérez MÁ, Arce Arnáez A. Monkeypox outbreak predominantly affecting men who have sex with men, Madrid, Spain, 26 April to 16 June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jul;27(27). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.27.2200471 External link
21.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. FAQ Monkeypox (Monkeypox virus, MPXV), (Version May 24, 2022). Greifswald: FLI; 2022. Available from: https://www.openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/openagrar_derivate_00046379/FLI-FAQ_Affenpocken_2022-05-24-en.pdf External link
22.
WHO. Multi-country monkeypox outbreak: situation update. Geneva: WHO; 2022 Jun 27 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON396 External link
23.
Mbala PK, Huggins JW, Riu-Rovira T, Ahuka SM, Mulembakani P, Rimoin AW, Martin JW, Muyembe JT. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women With Human Monkeypox Infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J Infect Dis. 2017 10;216(7):824-8. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix260 External link
24.
Nörz D, Pfefferle S, Brehm TT, Franke G, Grewe I, Knobling B, Aepfelbacher M, Huber S, Klupp EM, Jordan S, Addo MM, Schulze Zur Wiesch J, Schmiedel S, Lütgehetmann M, Knobloch JK. Evidence of surface contamination in hospital rooms occupied by patients infected with monkeypox, Germany, June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(26). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.26.2200477 External link
25.
Peiró-Mestres A, Fuertes I, Camprubí-Ferrer D, Marcos MÁ, Vilella A, Navarro M, Rodriguez-Elena L, Riera J, Català A, Martínez MJ, Blanco JL; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Monkeypox Study Group. Frequent detection of monkeypox virus DNA in saliva, semen, and other clinical samples from 12 patients, Barcelona, Spain, May to June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jul;27(28). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.28.2200503 External link
26.
Falkenhorst G, Jansen K, Lachmann R, Koppe U, Selb R, Steffen G et al. Weltweiter Ausbruch von Affenpocken - Situationsbeschreibung des Robert Koch-Instituts für Deutschland, Datenstand 14.07.2022. Epid Bull. 2022;29:3-10. DOI: 10.25646/10309 External link
27.
WHO. Monkeypox – Keyfacts. Geneva: WHO; 2022 May 19 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox External link
28.
Wißmann JE, Kirchhoff L, Brüggemann Y, Todt D, Steinmann J, Steinmann E. Persistence of Pathogens on Inanimate Surfaces: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms. 2021 Feb;9(2). DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020343 External link
29.
Sidwell RW, Dixon GJ, McNeil E. Quantitative studies on fabrics as disseminators of viruses. I. Persistence of vaccinia virus on cotton and wool fabrics. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Jan;14(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1128/am.14.1.55-59.1966 External link
30.
Sidwell RW, Dixon GJ, McNeil E. Quantitative studies on fabrics as disseminators of viruses. 3. Persistence of vaccinia virus on fabrics impregnated with a virucidal agent. Appl Microbiol. 1967 Jul;15(4):921-7. DOI: 10.1128/am.15.4.921-927.1967 External link
31.
Johnson RF, Dyall J, Ragland DR, Huzella L, Byrum R, Jett C, St Claire M, Smith AL, Paragas J, Blaney JE, Jahrling PB. Comparative analysis of monkeypox virus infection of cynomolgus macaques by the intravenous or intrabronchial inoculation route. J Virol. 2011 Mar;85(5):2112-25. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01931-10 External link
32.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Empfehlungen zur Desinfektion bei Tierseuchen. Affenpocken. Status 2020 Jul 30 [Retrieved 18 July 2022]. Available from: https://www.openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/openagrar_derivate_00025855/FLI-7-1-Affenpocken-RL-Desinfektion-V01-2020-07-30-bf.pdf External link
33.
Robert Koch Institute. Infektionen mit Orthopockenviren durch „Schmuseratten“. Epid Bull. 2008 Sep;37:318-9.
34.
Robert Koch Institute. Kuhpocken: Zu einer Häufung von Infektionen nach Kontakt zu „Schmuseratten“ im Großraum München. Epid Bull. 2009 Feb;6:53-6.
35.
Robert Koch Institute. Infektionen mit Kuhpockenviren in Deutschland – eine Übersicht. Epid Bull. 2007 Mar;10:79-81.
36.
European Medicines Agency. EMA recommends approval of Imvanex fort he prevention of monkeypox disease. Amsterdam: EMA; 2022 Jul 22 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-approval-imvanex-prevention-monkeypox-disease External link
37.
STIKO. Ständige Impfkommission: Beschluss der STIKO für die Empfehlung zur Impfung gegen Affenpocken mit Imvanex (MVA-Impfstoff). Epid Bull. 2022;25/26:3-4. DOI: 10.25646/10213 External link
38.
Eggers M, Schwebke I, Suchomel M, Fotheringham V, Gebel J, Meyer B, Morace G, Roedger HJ, Roques C, Visa P, Steinhauer K. The European tiered approach for virucidal efficacy testing – rationale for rapidly selecting disinfectants against emerging and re-emerging viral diseases. Euro Surveill. 2021 01;26(3). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2000708 External link
39.
Eggers M, Eickmann M, Kowalski K, Zorn J, Reimer K. Povidone-iodine hand wash and hand rub products demonstrated excellent in vitro virucidal efficacy against Ebola virus and modified vaccinia virus Ankara, the new European test virus for enveloped viruses. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;15:375. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1111-9 External link
40.
Eggers M, Eickmann M, Zorn J. Rapid and Effective Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine Products Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA). Infect Dis Ther. 2015 Dec;4(4):491-501. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-015-0091-9 External link
41.
Siddharta A, Pfaender S, Vielle NJ, Dijkman R, Friesland M, Becker B, Yang J, Engelmann M, Todt D, Windisch MP, Brill FH, Steinmann J, Steinmann J, Becker S, Alves MP, Pietschmann T, Eickmann M, Thiel V, Steinmann E. Virucidal Activity of World Health Organization-Recommended Formulations Against Enveloped Viruses, Including Zika, Ebola, and Emerging Coronaviruses. J Infect Dis. 2017 03;215(6):902-6. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix046 External link
42.
Anderson DE, Sivalingam V, Kang AEZ, Ananthanarayanan A, Arumugam H, Jenkins TM, Hadjiat Y, Eggers M. Povidone-Iodine Demonstrates Rapid In Vitro Virucidal Activity Against SARS-CoV-2, The Virus Causing COVID-19 Disease. Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):669-75. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-020-00316-3 External link
43.
Kratzel A, Todt D, V’kovski P, Steiner S, Gultom M, Thao TTN, Ebert N, Holwerda M, Steinmann J, Niemeyer D, Dijkman R, Kampf G, Drosten C, Steinmann E, Thiel V, Pfaender S. Inactivation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 by WHO-Recommended Hand Rub Formulations and Alcohols. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 07;26(7):1592-5. DOI: 10.3201/eid2607.200915 External link
44.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. Affenpocken (Monkeypox virus, MXV). Status 2022 May 31 [Retrieved 18 July 2022]. Available from. https://www.openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/openagrar_derivate_00046488/Steckbrief-Affenpocken-2022-05-31-bf.pdf External link
45.
von Rheinbaben F, Wolff MH. Viruzide Desinfektionsmittel und -verfahren — Einteilung und Besonderheiten. In: von Rheinbaben F, Wolff MH, editors. Handbuch der viruswirksamen Desinfektion. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002. p. 283–308 . DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56394-2_13 External link
46.
The Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH) Disinfectants Commission, editor. Requirements and Methods for VAH Certification of Chemical Disinfection Procedures: Annex V (Requirements for virucidal efficacy), Status 1 November 2021. 2021 Nov 1. Available from: https://vah-online.de/files/download/english/2021_11_VAH_Methods_Requirements_Chapters%201%20to%204.pdf External link
47.
VAH, editor. VAH List of disinfectants. Wiesbaden: mhp Verlag GmbH; Issue 2022 Sep 29. Available from: https://vah-liste.mhp-verlag.de/en/ External link
48.
Eggers M, Rabenau HF, Blümel J, Fickenscher H, Geisel B, Glebe D, Hengel H, Marschang R, Reiche S, Steinmann E, Steinmann J, Schwebke I. Einsatz geeigneter Desinfektionsmittel bei gentechnisch veränderten Viren und viralen Vektoren: Stellungnahme der Kommission für Virusdesinfektion der Deutschen Vereinigung zur Bekämpfung der Viruskrankheiten (DVV) e. V. und der Gesellschaft für Virologie (GfV) e. V. Epid Bull. 2020;35:3-14. DOI: 10.25646/7030 External link
49.
Marcic A, Gleich S, Schwebke I. FAQ. Regulatory monitoring and ordering of disinfection measures. HygMed. 2022;47(6):130-1. DOI: 10.1002/fsh.10735 External link
50.
Robert Koch-Institut. Empfehlungen des RKI zu Hygienemaßnahmen im Rahmen der Behandlung und Pflege von Patienten mit einer Infektion durch Affenpockenviren in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. Stand 2022 May 30 [Retrieved 2022 Jul 18].
51.
Liste der vom Robert Koch-Institut geprüften und anerkannten Desinfektionsmittel und -verfahren: Stand: 31. Oktober 2017 (17. Ausgabe). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Nov;60(11):1274-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2634-6 External link
52.
Ausschuss für Biologische Arbeitsstoffe. Beschluss 7/2022: Empfehlungen des ABAS zum Arbeitsschutz nach Biostoffverordnung bei Affenpocken. Stand 22.7.2022. Vorabveröffentlichung. 2022 Jul [ Retrieved 2022 Jul 27].