gms | German Medical Science

45. Gemeinsame Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie und Andrologie und der Bayerischen Urologenvereinigung

09.05. - 11.5.2019, Wien, Österreich

Comparison of PIRADS 3 lesions with histopathological findings after MRI-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in a real world-setting

Meeting Abstract

  • Boris Schlenker - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Urologie
  • presenting/speaker Maria Apfelbeck - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Urologie
  • Michael Chaloupka - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Urologie
  • Christian G. Stief - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Urologie
  • Dirk-André Clevert - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Radiologie

Österreichische Gesellschaft für Urologie und Andrologie. Bayerische Urologenvereinigung. 45. Gemeinsame Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie und Andrologie und der Bayerischen Urologenvereinigung. Wien, 09.-11.05.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. Doc19oegu012

doi: 10.3205/19oegu012, urn:nbn:de:0183-19oegu0128

Veröffentlicht: 8. April 2019

© 2019 Schlenker et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate whether PIRADS 3 lesions in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) represent a significant risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in a real-world setting of different referring radiologic institutes.

Materials and methods: Between May 2015 and October 2017, a total of 408 patients were referred to our clinic for MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate (FusPbx) due to suspected prostate cancer. In all patients, preoperatively an mpMRI of the prostate was performed by altogether 62 different radiologic institutes. Prostate lesions were classified according to the PIRADS system. A PIRADS 3 lesion was diagnosed in 41 patients. FusPbx was performed transrectally using a Philips EPIQ 7 (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) scanner with plane wise fusion of ultrasound and MRI image data. In addition to FusPbx in each patient a randomized 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (USPbx) was performed.

Results: Mean PSA Level was 9.5 ng/ml (range: 1–26 ng/ml), mean patients age was 66.1 years (48.6–80.4). In 11/41 patients (26.8 %) prostate cancer was diagnosed by FusPbx of the PIRADS 3 lesion. In the target lesion PCa was classified as Gleason Score 3+3 in 5 patients, as 3+4 in 3, 4+3 in 1, 4+4 in 1 and 4+5 in 1 patient. In patients with negative FusPbx USPbx revealed PCa in another 7 patients (17.1 %). In 5 of these GS 3+3 PCa was found, in another 2 patients GS 3+4 PCa.

Conclusions: PIRADS 3 lesion indicates an equivocal likelihood of significant prostate cancer. In our series the overall PCa detection rate was 26.8 % and 14.6 % for clinically significant cancer in PIRADS 3 lesions. This evokes the question, if PIRADS 3 lesions could be surveilled only. The findings should be confirmed in a larger series.