gms | German Medical Science

64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e. V. (GMDS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie

08. - 11.09.2019, Dortmund

Towards standardized documentation of mouse lines in biomedical basic research

Meeting Abstract

  • Sophia Rheinländer - University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany
  • Georg Aschenbrandt - University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany
  • Sara Yasemin Nussbeck - University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany; University Medical Center Göttingen, UMG Biobank, Göttingen, Germany
  • Markus Suhr - University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany
  • Harald Kusch - University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Informatics, Göttingen, Germany; University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Molecular Biology, Göttingen, Germany

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). Dortmund, 08.-11.09.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2019. DocAbstr. 242

doi: 10.3205/19gmds038, urn:nbn:de:0183-19gmds0383

Veröffentlicht: 6. September 2019

© 2019 Rheinländer et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: Progress in biomedical research involves reproducibility of findings and an adequate management of research data [1]. Especially in complex and expensive research experiments, detailed and globally comprehensive depictions of methods involving animal models are crucial to understand and reproduce experimental designs.

Here, we describe our approach for a standardized documentation of model organisms, exemplary for mouse lines. Aiming at a sustainable research data management, a web-based module for storing and sharing mouse related research data is introduced within a persistent Research Data Platform (RDP) [2].

State of the Art: Publications in scientific journals are subject to increasingly precise policies. Policies often demand to publish associated research data, metadata and materials in publicly available online repositories in order to contribute to the reusability of data and reproducibility of findings.

Key concepts such as the FAIR guiding principles [3] and the ARRIVE guidelines [4] for improving the reporting of research using animals as well as the specific MGI guidelines [5] for nomenclature of mouse and rat strains are applied to improve the documentation of mouse related research data in a sustainable and standardized manner.

Concept: In cooperation with scientists on-site, we determined initial requirements for the documentation of mouse related research data in the context of the CRC 1002 and DZHK in Göttingen. A thorough analysis of the ARRIVE guidelines, publication instructions of journals and the internationally standardized nomenclature of the Jackson Laboratory Guidelines for Nomenclature of Mouse and Rat Strains completed the derived requirements and resulted in the creation of a metadata schema and minimum dataset. On this basis, we aim at providing a web-based mouse line catalogue as an RDP module that integrates the analyzed standardized documentation guidelines.

Implementation: The mouse line catalogue is implemented as one of ten modules of a web-based RDP to support scientists with sustainable research data management. It offers the possibility to document single mouse lines and individual mice thereof. The data in the catalogue comprises inter alia details about the mouse line itself (e.g. breeding type, strain name), genetic mutations according to the gene nomenclature of the NCBI Gene DB and provenance data. Different levels of data sharing are offered as well as a functionality to link mouse lines and data sets to corresponding scientific publications in the RDP. Each data entry is assigned a persistent identifier compatible with the Handle system which can be used in scientific publications to refer to specific resources better than by stating a more or less unique label.

Lessons Learned: Despite isolated initiatives, so far no universal standardized nomenclature for mouse-related research data has been established which poses challenges of harmonization among different types of documentation. Our initial approach is restricted to the documentation of the most commonly used types of mouse lines because modelling the complete fine-grained nomenclature for mice of the Jackson Laboratory is complex and needs to be advanced in the future.

Existing local software solutions that are designed to fulfill regulatory animal management requirements are not suitable for reproducibility-improving research data management tasks.

This work was funded by the DFG for the Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) 1002 on Modulatory Units in Heart Failure, subproject INF.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that an ethics committee vote is not required.


References

1.
Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Science translational medicine. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12.
2.
Kusch H, Schmitt O, Marzec B, Nussbeck SY. Datenorganisation eines klinischen Sonderforschungsbereiches in einer integrierten, langfristig verfügbaren Forschungsdatenplattform. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Hrsg. GMDS 2015. 60. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). Krefeld, 06.-09.09.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocAbstr. 123. DOI: 10.3205/15gmds104 Externer Link
3.
Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data. 2016;3:160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 Externer Link
4.
Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. British journal of pharmacology. 2010 Aug 1;160(7):1577-9. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.220 Externer Link
5.
Smith C, Shimoyama M. MGI-Guidelines for Nomenclature of Genes, Genetic Markers, Alleles, & Mutations in Mouse & Rat. 2018 [Accessed April 15, 2019]. Available from: http://www.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/nomen/gene.shtml Externer Link