gms | German Medical Science

67. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Koreanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (KNS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

12. - 15. Juni 2016, Frankfurt am Main

Intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging and multimodal neuronavigation guided surgery for patients with low-grade temporal lobe glioma and epilepsy

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Xiaolei Chen - Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yining Zhao - Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Shaocong Bai - Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Jiashu Zhang - Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xingguang Yu - Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 67. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 1. Joint Meeting mit der Koreanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (KNS). Frankfurt am Main, 12.-15.06.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. DocMI.13.05

doi: 10.3205/16dgnc309, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgnc3091

Veröffentlicht: 8. Juni 2016

© 2016 Chen et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of intra-operative MR imaging in temporal lobe low-grade glioma (LGG) surgery and to report the surgical outcome in our series with regard to seizures, neurological defects, and quality of life.

Method: Patients with temporal lobe non-enhancing gliomas who presented with seizures in the course of their disease were enrolled in our prospective study. We non-randomly assigned patients to undergo intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI)-guided surgery or conventional micro-surgery. Extent of resection (EOR) and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The post-operative neurological deficits were recorded. And survey for the health related quality of life of the patients, were conducted and analyzed.

Results: Forty-one patients were analyzed in the iMRI group, and 14 were in the conventional group. Comparable EOR was achieved for the two groups (p = 0.634) although preoperative tumor volumes were significantly larger for the iMRI group. Seizure outcome tended to be better for the iMRI group (Engel class I achieved for 89.7 % (35/39) vs 75 % (9/12)), although this difference was not statistically different. Newly developed neurological deficits were observed in four patients (10.3 %) in iMRI group and two patients (16.7 %) in control group, respectively (p = 0.928). Free of seizures and neurological morbidity led to a return-to-work or return-to-school rate of 84.6 % (33/39) in iMRI group vs 75 % (9/12) in control group, respectively (p = 0.741).

Conclusions: Our study provided evidence that iMRI could be a safe and useful tool in temporal lobe LGG surgery. Optimal extent of resection contributed to favorable seizure outcome in our series with low morbidity rate, which led to a higher return-to-work rate. A larger cohort, randomized trial is needed to verify the real role of iMRI for the surgical management of temporal lobe LGGs.