Artikel
Age-related differences in subjective and objective measures of pain, functional impairment and health-related quality of life in lumbar degenerative disc disease
Suche in Medline nach
Autoren
Veröffentlicht: | 8. Juni 2016 |
---|
Gliederung
Text
Objective: Demographic changes will lead to an increase of elderly people in our population and to a higher prevalence of patients suffering from degenerative disc disease (DDD) consecutively. The goal of this study was to investigate age-related differences in subjective and objective measures of pain, functional impairment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with lumbar DDD.
Method: In a prospective two-center study, back and leg pain intensity (visual analogue scale (VAS)), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Index (RMDI)) and HRQoL (EuroQol-5D (EQ5D), Short-Form (SF12)) were collected for consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery to assess subjective functional impairment (SFI). Objective functional impairment (OFI) was estimated using the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test. Study groups were built according to age less than 65 or 65 and over.
Results: A total of n=329 patients (n=137 females, 41.6%) with a mean age of 58.4 years (standard deviation (SD) 15.5) were included. Patients less than 65 years (n=200, 60.8%) reported significantly higher VAS leg pain (5.4 vs. 4.4, p=0.002) than patients of 65 years and over (n=129, 39.2%), whilst there was no difference in VAS back pain. Younger patients had a higher functional impairment (RMDI 12.3 vs. 10.9, p=0.008). Regarding HRQoL, both EQ5D Index (0.501 vs. 0.410, p=0.001) and SF12 Mental Component Score (MCS; 45.2 vs. 40.8, p=0.001) were significantly better in the older age group. Younger patients showed more OFI (TUG-test t-score 135.3 vs. 115.8, p<0.0001). In univariate analysis, patients less than 65 years were 3.5 times as likely as 65 years old and over patients to show OFI (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.49, p<0.001). Once this analysis was corrected for baseline group differences, the relationship was slightly attenuated, but remained significant (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84, p=0.014).
Conclusions: The TUG test, as a standardized approach to the measurement of OFI, provides a better option than non-standardized tests of SFI when measuring and comparing the functional impairment of patients in different age groups.