gms | German Medical Science

67. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Koreanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (KNS)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

12. - 15. Juni 2016, Frankfurt am Main

Prevalence of complications in concurrent intraoperative neuromonitoring and ioMRI

Meeting Abstract

  • Oliver Bozinov - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Jan-Karl Burkhardt - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Marian Neidert - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Jorn Fierstra - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Luca Regli - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Johannes Sarnthein - Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 67. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 1. Joint Meeting mit der Koreanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (KNS). Frankfurt am Main, 12.-15.06.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. DocDI.06.08

doi: 10.3205/16dgnc133, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgnc1332

Veröffentlicht: 8. Juni 2016

© 2016 Bozinov et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The combination of Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) and high-field intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) with the use of conductive cables in the MR scanner may lead to unexpected problems. We investigated the prevalence of complications and tested MR-heating experimentally.

Method: We documented all subcutaneous needle electrodes since 2013 that remained on the patient during intraoperative 3 Tesla ioMRI scans in our clinic. We also simulated an ioMRI session with gel and measured the temperature increase with optical fibers.

Results: We placed 1093 subcutaneous needles in 52 surgical procedures, patients aged 18 months to 65 years, with concurrent IONM and ioMRI. One patient suffered from a skin irritation at his shoulder. In one of seven patients with needles placed in the orbital cavity, an electrode with a 0.4 m cable was used and may have caused tissue heating. A corneal erosion with a resulting corneal scar and necessity of amblyopia treatment was diagnosed postoperatively. In the simulated ioMRI session we achieved a heating of more than 7°C for the electrode with the 0.4 m cable but not for the 1.5 m cable. Heating was due to the electric effect of the conductive cable and can occur with both ferromagnetic and diamagnetic materials. All other needles had no side effects.

Conclusions: We have corroborated the history of safe use for 1091 electrodes with 1.5 m cable. Needles with 0.4 m electrode cable should not be used in MRI. Heating can occur in poorly perfused tissue like the cornea. Placement of electrodes in the orbital cavity should be evaluated carefully.