gms | German Medical Science

65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

11. - 14. Mai 2014, Dresden

Intrahospital Transports and Intracerebral Pressure (ITIP-Trial) – An observational study

Meeting Abstract

  • Jens Kleffmann - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel
  • Nikhil Thakur - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel
  • Roman Pahl - Institut für Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Philipps Universität Marburg
  • Wolfgang Deinsberger - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel
  • Christian Roth - Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Kassel

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Dresden, 11.-14.05.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. DocP 075

doi: 10.3205/14dgnc471, urn:nbn:de:0183-14dgnc4713

Veröffentlicht: 13. Mai 2014

© 2014 Kleffmann et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Intrahospital Transport (IT) of critically ill patients, is a routine occurence. IT increases the risk of complications. The patient collective of a neuro-intensive care unit differentiates itself from that of other critical care units, amongst many other factors, by the higher number of patient transports for the purpose of neuroradiologic diagnostic procedures. CT is a frequently performed procedure, especially during the critical phases of condition. To our knowledge, up to now, no data exists regarding the development of ICP during ITs.

Method: We prospectively collected data from patients being treated on our neurological/neurosurgical intensive care unit between 7/13 and 12/13. Inclusion criteria were the presence of ICP-measurement and the need for IT. Minute-to-minute measurement of ICP, CPP, SpO2, MAP HR started 30’ before the procedure, and was continued for another 30’ after the end of the procedure. The individual measurements were compiled as mean values for the individual phases of the transport. (a=preparation, b=transport to the radiology department, c=imagistic study, d=transport back to our critical care unit and e=post-transport monitoring). Changes in comparison with the initial baseline-value were monitored. Secondarily evaluated parameters were general complications. Paired t-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used. A probability value of p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 34 ITs were carried out (f=16, m=18; mean age = 58 years; age range: 23-76 years). Baseline ICP was 8 mmHg. During b the mean ICP rose to 15mmHg, during c to 17mmHg mmHg. All data were significantly higher compared to the baseline level. The development of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) showed a significant increase up to 102 mmHg during c. The SpO2 did not show any significant changes. Mean duration of the procedure was a=15’, b=5’, c=11’ and d=6’, respectively.

Conclusions: Our results show, that there is a significant periprocedural rise of ICP during IT whereas, ICP decreases again within a few minutes after the procedure. From our point of view, transport of critically ill patients should only be performed under constant monitoring of ICP and CPP. Due to the transport-related ICP increase and its possible complications, which very often require a therapeutic intervention, we suggest that critical care unit personnel, which are directly involved in the treatment of the patient, should only carry out such transports.