gms | German Medical Science

25th Annual Meeting of the German Retina Society

German Retina Society

01.06. - 02.06.2012, Münster

Treatment planning intercomparison of a para-foveal choroidal melanoma: 68 MeV protons vs. Ru-106 plaque

Meeting Abstract

  • Jens Heufelder - Charité Universitätsmedizin Protonen am HZB Berlin; Augenklinik der Charité CBF Berlin
  • A. Weber - Charité Universitätsmedizin Protonen am HZB Berlin
  • L. Moser - Charité Universitätsmedizin, Klink für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie CBF Berlin
  • G. Willerding - Augenklinik der Charité CBF Berlin
  • A.M. Joussen - Augenklinik der Charité CBF Berlin

German Retina Society. 25th Annual Conference of the German Retina Society. Münster, 01.-02.06.2012. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2012. Doc12rg46

doi: 10.3205/12rg46, urn:nbn:de:0183-12rg464

This is the English version of the article.
The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/rg2012/12rg46.shtml

Published: May 30, 2012

© 2012 Heufelder et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Background: Depending on size and position of a tumour in the eye radiation therapy can be administered either with protons or with plaques. Proton radiation therapy with its homogeneous dose distribution is usually used for tumours with a prominence of greater than 5 mm or if the tumors are located at the posterior pole of the eye. In most of the other cases Ruthenium-106 plaques are used. It is possible to achieve a good tumor control with both methods.

Methods: For the treatment planning intercomparison a choroidal melanoma with 2 mm distance to the fovea was chosen. The tumour base is 11.5×10.5 mm²; its prominence is 3.5 mm. The proton dose distribution is calculated by the treatment planning program OCTOPUS v4.4.9. A total dose of 60 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent, 1 CGE = 1.1 Gy for protons) was prescribed. The dose calculation for the CCA-plaque of Bebig was performed by the Monte-Carlo Code MCNPX v2.6.0. Dose prescription to the tumour apex was 100 Gy and to the sclera at least 400 Gy.

Results: Proton beam irradiation allows a homogeneous irradiation of the tumour with 60 CGE. The dose of the plaque varies between 100 Gy (tumour apex) and 346 Gy (tumor base). The sclera contact dose is 426 Gy. In both cases, protons and plaque, 25% of the retina is surrounded by the 20 Gy isodose. The mean dose to the fovea administered by the plaque is 23.7 Gy. In the proton case the fovea gets no dose.

Conclusions: Both methods achieve irradiation of the tumour according to their prescriptions. Proton beam therapy has a homogeneous dose distribution with less radiation to the retina and especially to the fovea.