gms | German Medical Science

GMS German Medical Science — an Interdisciplinary Journal

Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF)

ISSN 1612-3174

A new approach for the determination of immunosuppressive drugs using HPLC-MS/MS and Cs+ adducts

Neuer Ansatz zur Bestimmung von Immunsuppressiva unter Einsatz von HPLC-MS/MS und Cs+-Addukten

Research Article

  • corresponding author Patricia Kaiser - Reference Laboratory, Instand e.V., Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Theodorus Akerboom - Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • William Graham Wood - Reference Laboratory, Instand e.V., Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Hans Reinauer - Reference Laboratory, Instand e.V., Düsseldorf, Germany

GMS Ger Med Sci 2006;4:Doc01

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.egms.de/en/journals/gms/2006-4/000030.shtml

Received: December 21, 2005
Published: January 18, 2006

© 2006 Kaiser et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Abstract

In this study a new principle of measurement in LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography mass spectrometry) for determination of the immunosuppressive drugs sirolimus, everolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporin A has been introduced by using the Cs+ ion as the product ion in the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM).

Separation of the immunosuppressive agents was achieved using a phenyl-hexyl-RP column together with a ternary gradient elution profile, consisting of water, methanol and acetonitrile combined with 0.1% v/v formic acid and 0.1 mmol/l Cs+.

Quantification was performed using cyclosporin D, ascomycin and 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin as internal standards.

The inter-run precision of this new method, expressed as the coefficient of variation, was 2.57% for sirolimus, 2.11% for everolimus, 2.31% for tacrolimus and 2.11% for cyclosporin A.

Keywords: immunosuppressive drugs, LC-MS/MS, Cs+ adducts

Zusammenfassung

Ein neues Messprinzip in der LC-MS/MS (Flüssigchromatographie mit Massenspektrometrie) wird zur Bestimmung der Immunsuppressiva Sirolimus, Everolimus, Tacrolimus und Cyclosporin A vorgestellt. Hierbei wird das Cs+-Ion als Produkt-Ion im MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) Modus gemessen. Eine chromatographische Trennung der Immunsuppressiva wurde mit einer Phenyl-Hexyl-RP Säule erzielt. Die Elution erfolgte unter Verwendung eines ternären Gradienten aus Wasser, Methanol und Acetonitril mit 0,1% v/v Ameisensäure und 0,1 mmol/l Cs+. Für die Quantifizierung wurden Cyclosporin D, Ascomycin und 32-Desmethoxy-Rapamycin eingesetzt. Die Wiederholpräzision der neuen Methode hat einen Varianzkoeffizienten (VK) von 2,57% für Sirolimus, 2,11% für Everolimus, 2,31% für Tacrolimus und 2,11% für Cyclosporin A.

Schlüsselwörter: Immunosuppressiva, LC-MS/MS, Cs+-Addukte


Introduction

The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressive drugs in blood of organ-transplanted patients is of utmost importance to prevent intoxication or rejection due to incorrect dosage. Commonly used immunosuppressive agents are calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporin A and tacrolimus or the mTOR inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus. Recently a new therapeutic strategy has been to combine immunosuppressive drugs with different mechanisms of action in order to reduce undesirable side effects. This often leads to a lowering of the therapeutic concentrations of these drugs. Analytical problems occur in the detection of clinically relevant low levels of immunosuppressive agents, which in turn requires a more sensitive analytical measurement procedure at low analyte concentrations for all the drugs used.

Several LC-MS/MS methods for routine measurement of immunosuppressive drugs in whole blood have been described [1], [2], [3]. These routine methods have been designed for high throughput combined with a short turnaround time. Methods without chromatographic separation of the analytes require cycles of only a few minutes per sample. Unfortunately, co-elution of the compounds usually leads to a bias in the analytical results, due to a lack of specificity of the mass transition in the MRM mode of the LC-MS/MS measurements [4], [5]. Avoidance of this phenomenon requires separation and detection of the parent substances from the different metabolites with biological activity.

LC-MS/MS procedures for determination of serum levels of digoxin and digitoxin have been recently published from this laboratory [6], [7] using Cs+ adduct formation, which allows potential improvement of both analytical sensitivity and specificity.

The aim of the present study was to develop a method for determination of immunosuppressive agents, by utilising the principle of measurement of Cs+ adducts, thus forming the basis of a reliable method for defining target values for immunosuppressive drugs in external quality assessment schemes (EQAS).

This article describes a LC-MS/MS method with complete chromatographic separation of the immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporin A (cyclosporin A, Sandimmune®), tacrolimus (FK-506, Prograf®), sirolimus (rapamycin, Rapamune®) and everolimus (Certican®), with cyclosporin D, ascomycin and 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin as internal standards.


Materials and methods

Chemicals

Rapamycin (>99%), tacrolimus (FK-506, >99%) and cyclosporin A (>99%) were obtained from LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA. Cyclosporin D and everolimus were a kind gift from Recipe, München, Germany. 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin was a kind donation from Wyatt, St. Davids, PA, USA. Ascomycin, formic acid (98%, puriss. p.a.) and cesium hydroxide (purity 99.97%), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany. Methanol (LiChrosolv) was obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.

Water was prepared using the purification system Direct-Q™ 5 (Millipore GmbH, Eschborn, Germany).

Apparatus

The HPLC system used was from Shimadzu (Duisburg, Germany) consisting of a SCL-10A system controller, three LC-10ADvp pumps (A, B, C), a DGU-14A degasser; a SIL-10AD autoinjector; a CTU-10AS column oven; and a FCU-12A Flow Switch (rotary valve).

The Mass Spectrometer was a 4000 QTrap equipped with a TurboVTM ESI source with Turboion SprayTM probe from Applied Biosystems (MDS-Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany).

HPLC-MS/MS measurement conditions

The chromatographic separation was performed on a phenyl-hexyl-RP column (Luna®, 2 x 150 mm, 5 µm, Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany).

A ternary gradient was used for elution consisting of eluent A (pump A): 0.1% v/v HCOOH in water + 0.1 mmol/l CsOOCH; eluent B (pump B): 0.1% v/v HCOOH in methanol + 0.1 mmol/l CsOOCH and eluent C (pump C): 0.1% v/v HCOOH in CH3CN + 0.1 mmol/l CsOOCH. CsOOCH was produced by neutralising CsOH with HCOOH to pH 7. The flow rate was 300 µl/min. The column temperature was set at 50°C. In order to avoid contamination of the ESI source a switching valve system (rotary valve A) was introduced. At position 0 of rotary valve A the eluate is passed into the ESI source. At position 1 the eluate is directed into waste (Figure 1 [Fig. 1], Table 1 [Tab. 1]).

The MS detection was performed in the positive ion mode. The mass transitions (m/z) for MS detection are given in Table 2 [Tab. 2]. The m/z of 132.9 amu is the mass of the Cs+ ion.

The settings of the mass spectrometer are given in Table 3 [Tab. 3]. (The abbreviations for settings are specific to the 4000 Q TRAP software used to control the system.)


Results

As shown in previous publications [6], [7] the generation of Cs+ ion adducts combined with LC-MS/MS offered great advantages in analysis of digoxin and digitoxin, both in SIM and in MRM mode. It was observed, that in the MRM mode, the Cs+ adduct as parent ion decomposes in a way that the Cs+ ion becomes detectable as product ion.

This principle of measurement was investigated for the immunosuppressive agents tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, cyclosporin A together with the analogues ascomycin, 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin and cyclosporin D used as internal standards.

The generation of Cs+ adducts is examplified for cyclosporin A in Figure 2 [Fig. 2]. The Q1 scan was performed by using a standard solution, dissolved in eluent B, which contained 0.1 mM Cs+. Under these conditions the singly charged Cs+ adduct generates the major signal (1335 amu). Only small amounds of the protonated form (1203 amu), the Na+ adduct (1225 amu) and the K+ adduct (1241 amu) are visible. Na+ and K+ probably originate from the manufacturing procedure and can be separated by HPLC.

Fragmentation of the cyclosporin A Cs+ adduct was studied using an 4000 Q TRAP in the enhanced product ion scan mode (Figure 3 [Fig. 3]). The ion trap option offers a high mass resolution. In the product ion scan of Cs+ adduct of cyclosporin A with a parent mass of 1335 amu, the mass of 132.9 amu is the main signal. The isotope pattern of this signal and the defined mass indicates that this signal originates solely from Cs+.

During the mass transition the mass of 1202 amu is lost (Figure 4 [Fig. 4]). This value corresponds to the mass of the unprotonated cyclosporin A molecule. Thus, it can be considered, that cyclosporin A is split off in form of a neutral molecule in the fragmentation process. This concept is supported by the results of the neutral loss scan. This scan demonstrates, that the only source of the neutral loss of the unprotonated cyclosporin A molecule is the Cs+ adduct of cyclosporin A with the mass of 1235 amu.

The adduct formation with Cs+ and the subsequent collision induced dissociation with Cs+ as the product ion was observed for all seven analytes. This principle of detection was used for the development of the chromatographic separation of all immunosuppressive drugs. A baseline separation was realized by using a ternary gradient (Figure 5 [Fig. 5]).

In Figures 6-12 chromatograms of standard solutions of tacrolimus (Figure 6 [Fig. 6]), sirolimus (Figure 7 [Fig. 7]), everolimus (Figure 8 [Fig. 8]), cyclosporin A (Figure 9 [Fig. 9]) and the analogues cyclosporin D (Figure 10 [Fig. 10]), ascomycin (Figure 11 [Fig. 11]) and 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin (Figure 12 [Fig. 12]) are shown in separate runs. In addition to the declared components, these standard solutions contain additional substances (Figures 6-10 [Fig. 6], [Fig. 7], [Fig. 8], [Fig. 9], [Fig. 10]), which are separated during the chromatographic procedure. Tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, ascomycin and 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin contain isobaric components, which probably represent isomers, as has been described elsewhere [8]. For the cyclosporins A and D cross contamination is observed (Figures 11-12 [Fig. 11], [Fig. 12]). Cyclosporin A contains about 5% cyclosporin D and cyclosporin D contains about 1% cyclosporin A. This is of importance, as cyclosporin D is used as internal standard for quantification of cyclosporin A.

For quantification of tacrolimus, ascomycin was used as internal standard, for sirolimus and everolimus the internal standard used was 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin.

The validity of this method was tested during the course of this study, in which the inter-run precision was measured using standard solutions. The precision measured – expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) - under these conditions was 2.57% for sirolimus, 2.11% for everolimus, 2.31% for tacrolimus and 2.11% for cyclosporin A (Table 4 [Tab. 4]).


Discussion

Recent LC-MS/MS measurements of immunosuppressive drugs have often used NH4 + adducts, which give rise to several different product ions [4]. Addition of Cs+ ions reduced the number of product ions to one single product ion, namely the Cs+ ion, which is measurable with high specificity and high signal intensity. It is of utmost importance to have a highly specific analytical method with high accuracy and precision for use as an intended reference measurement procedure. The specificity of current LC-MS/MS methods should be improved by chromatographic separation [9]. In the method presented here, all four immunosuppressive drugs are fully separated. Different internal standards listed in the text have been used for the quantification of the four immunosuppressive drugs. The best results were obtained using the corresponding analogues, namely ascomycin for tacrolimus, 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin for sirolimus and everolimus and cyclosporin D for cyclosporin A. This has been discussed elsewhere by Vogeser et al [4].

A baseline separation of cyclosporin D from cyclosporin A has been realized, as well as the separation of sirolimus from 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin. If needed, separation of everolimus from the internal standard 32-desmethoxy-rapamycin or tacrolimus from the internal standard ascomycin can be made by slight modifications of the ternary gradient profile.

Until now, there are no pure reference materials available for the immunosuppressive agents. All analytes used have been extracted from biological sources and contain sodium and potassium ions (see Figure 2 [Fig. 2]) which can be removed by chromatographic separation so that the presence of Na+ and K+ adducts was less than 2%.

The high throughput routine methods which have been published for determination of immunosuppressive drugs do not separate the different immunosuppressive agents chromatographically. As a result, the routine methods currently in use are not suitable for setting target values in EQAS. They have limited specificity [4] and are prone to mass interferences [5]. In patient samples problems may occur during quantification, due to the presence of metabolites. At least 13 metabolites have been described for cyclosporin A [10]. The metabolites are usually more hydrophilic than the parent substance, due to hydroxylation, and can be separated by modifying the ternary gradient system used here.

For optimal quantification it is desirable to have stable isotope labelled analytes as internal standards [11]. Unfortunately, at present there are no commercial sources for isotopically labelled immunosuppressive agents. When stable-labelled compounds become available the method presented here can be developed into a reference measurement procedure for immunosuppressive drugs.


References

1.
Streit F, Armstrong VW, Oellerich M. Rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry routine method for simultaneous determination of sirolimus, everolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporin A in whole blood. Clin Chem. 2002;48(6 Pt 1):955-8.
2.
Ceglarek U, Lembcke J, Fiedler GM, Werner M, Witzigmann H, Hauss JP, Thiery J. Rapid simultaneous quantification of immunosuppressants in transplant patients by turbulent flow chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;346(2):181-90.
3.
Vogeser M, Fleischer C, Meiser B, Groetzner J, Spöhrer U, Seidel D. Quantification of sirolimus by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using on-line solid-phase extraction. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40(1):40-5.
4.
Vogeser M, Spöhrer U. Pitfall in the high-throughput quantification of whole blood cyclosporin A using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(4):400-2.
5.
Streit F, Armstrong VW, Oellerich M. Mass interferences in quantification of cyclosporin using tandem mass spectrometry without chromatography. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25(4):506. Abstract 80.
6.
Kaiser P, Kramer U, Meissner D, Kress M, Wood WG, Reinauer H. Determination of the cardiac glycosides digoxin and digitoxin by liquid chromatography combined with isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS)-a candidate reference measurement procedure. Clin Lab. 2003;49(7-8):329-43.
7.
Kaiser P, Akerboom T, Wood WG, Reinauer H. A novel LC-IDMS/MS method for the determination of the cardiac glycosides digoxin and digitoxin using Cs+ adducts. Clin Lab. 2006: in press.
8.
Kirchner GI, Vidal C, Winkler M, Mueller L, Jacobsen W, Franzke A, Sewing KF. LC/ESI-MS allows simultaneous and specific quantification of SDZ RAD and cyclosporine, including groups of their metabolites in human blood. Ther Drug Monit. 1999;21(1):116-22.
9.
Vogeser M, Zachoval R, Spöhrer U, Jacob K. Potential lack of specificity using electrospray tandem-mass spectrometry for the analysis of mycophenolic acid in serum. Ther Drug Monit. 2001;23(6):722-4.
10.
Tuominen J, Suortti T, Ishikawa K, Lundell J, Koga Y. Separation of cyclosporins by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric study of cyclosporin metabolites. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1998;12(16):1085-91.
11.
Taylor PJ, Brown SR, Cooper DP, Salm P, Morris MR, Pillans PI, Lynch SV. Evaluation of 3 internal standards for the measurement of cyclosporin by HPLC-mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2005;51(10):1890-3.