Article
The climate change related health impact of flexible ureteroscopes: A comparative life-cycle asessment of single-use versus reusable devices
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | March 26, 2024 |
---|
Outline
Text
Introduction: Climate change is a global challenge and health systems are relevant contributors to CO2 emissions. Hence, concepts of Planetary Health have been implemented into urological practice. Earlier studies have specifically focused on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of single-use or reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). The methodology used is highly data-dependent and knowledge on intra-hospital emissions is still limited. Here, we present a methodical approach for intra-institutional processes of LCA for fURS.
Methods: LCA was performed to assess the CO2 equivalents of single-use and reusable fURS (production, use-phase, reprocessing, maintenance, disposal) to approximate the Global Warming Potential (GWP) per use. Associated human health impacts were evaluated using the impact assessment method ReCiPe2016(H) and Disability-adjusted Life Years (DALYs).
Results: Assuming 133 usages per fURS and maintenance after each 11th use, 1.24 kg CO2 eq equal to 1.15E-06 DALYs resulted for one application of a reusable fURS. 4.93 kg CO2 eq and 4.57E-06 DALYs resulted for single-use fURS. Most influential parameters were the production and reprocessing stages for the life cycles of single-use and reusable fURS, respectively.
Conclusion: Ureterorenoscopy, as many medical procedures, has an impact on Planetary Health. Its impact is measurable to a Human Health level. In this Life Cycle Analysis, single-use devices had a higher impact on Human Health. This study may act as a basis for similar analyses and provide research in the field of climate change and health with stronger evidence.
Figure 1 [Fig. 1]