Article
Surgical strategy for angular deformity correction in thumb polydactyly reconstruction
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | February 6, 2020 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objectives/Interrogation: Proposed surgical strategy and analyzed the result of soft tissue reconstruction with or without corrective osteotomy for correction angular deformity in thumb polydactyly surgery.
Methods: Surgical procedures for correction angular deformity of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joint in thumb polydactyly were restrospective reviewed. Classified by degrees of angulation into mild (< 30 degrees) and severe angulation (>30 degrees), the operations and surgical outcomes were analyzed in terms of surgical procedures (soft tissue reconstructions with/without corrective osteotomy), post-operative complications and residual deformity.
Results and Conclusions: 42 thumb polydactyly were reviewed. Six were skin-tag type and treated by simple excision without complications and residual deformity. Other 36 patients were presented with angular deformity of MCP and/or IP joint.
For MCP joint deformity, there was 25 patients had mild MCP angulation (< 30 degrees). All 25 patients were treated by soft tissue reconstruction alone without osteotomy. The result in this group showed residual deformity only 8% (2/25 patients). In severe MCP angulation (>30 degrees), there was 11 patients in this group. Only 6/11 patients (54.5%) achieved proper alignment from soft tissue procedure alone and other 5 patients (45.5%) need metacarpal osteotomy to correct MCP angulation. Prognosis of this group showed residual deformity up to 27.3% (3/11 patients).
For IP joint deformity, there was 27 patients had mild IP angulation (< 30 degrees). All 27 patients were treated by soft tissue reconstruction alone without requiring osteotomy. The result in this group showed no residual deformity. In severe IP angulation (> 30 degrees), there was 9 patients in this group. Only 3/9 patients (33.3%) achieved proper alignment from soft tissue procedure alone and other 6 patients (66.7%) need phalangeal osteotomy to correct IP angulation. Prognosis of this group showed residual deformity up to 77.8% (7/9 patients).
In conclusion,soft tissue reconstruction alone was the effective method for correction angular deformity in mild deformity (< 30 degrees) of MCP and IP joint with low residual deformity (8% for MCP and 0% for IP joint). However,severe angulation (> 30 degrees) of MCP and IP deformity need both soft tissue and corrective osteotomy to achieve proper deformity correction and less predictable results especially in IP joint deformity(long-term residual deformity 27.3% for MCP and up to 77.8% for severe IP joint deformity).