gms | German Medical Science

14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT)

17.06. - 21.06.2019, Berlin

Clinical Outcomes of Zone 1 Flexor Tendon Injuries Treated With Bone Anchor

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • presenting/speaker RaviKanth Mallina - Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Rajive Jose - Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy. 14th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT), 11th Triennial Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Hand Therapy (IFSHT). Berlin, 17.-21.06.2019. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocIFSSH19-1645

doi: 10.3205/19ifssh0996, urn:nbn:de:0183-19ifssh09960

Published: February 6, 2020

© 2020 Mallina et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objectives/Interrogation: Surgical repair of Zone 1 flexor tendon injuries is associated with significant complications depending on the fixation methods. Some studies have reported a complication rate as high as 65% and there is no consensus on optimal fixation technique. We report our results of treating Zone 1 FDP injuries at tertiary referral Hand Unit.

Methods: All Zone 1 FDP injuries between January 2012 to December 2017 were retrieved from our in-house bespoke electronic database, the eHands. Relevant patient demographics, mechanism of injury, type of injury classified according to Leddy and Packer classification, intra-operative findings, rehabilitation protocol and functional assessment as per modified Strickland criteria were recorded.

Results and Conclusions: A total of 68 Zone 1 FDP injuries with a mean follow-up of 72 months (range 9-56m) were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 21y (range 18-54), majority being men(n=41). Time from injury to surgery was at a mean of 5 days (range 3-8d). Contact sports were the major cause of the injury(n=21). Majority of the injuries were Leddy Parker type 2(n=18) and type 1(n=32). Only 3 patients had type 4 injury and the remaining patients has type 4 injury. A significant proportion of Zone 1 injuries were treated by Mitek micro bone anchor (DePuy Mitek Inc., MA, USA): n=48. All patients underwent rehabilitation as per the Belfast controlled active movement (CAM) regime. 6 patients underwent surgery for subsequent complications, two directly related to the failure of the bone anchor. According to the modified Strickland criteria 18 patients had excellent, 13 had fair and the remaining had poor outcome.

The current study is the largest series reporting the use of bone anchors in Zone 1 FDP tendon injuries. These injuries when treated with bone anchors although have a low complication rate, are not necessarily associated with excellent outcomes.