Article
Cosmetic appearance of congenital upper extremity anomalies
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | February 6, 2020 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objectives/Interrogation: Cosmetic disability of congenital hand anomalies is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the general opinion about how different congenitally malformed hands look.
Methods: We developed a questionnaire in a game format to evaluate the appearance of different hands. Altogether 1450 (954 females) 4-84-year-old residents (296 children) of two European and one Asian (n=102) country were asked to rate the appearance of hands on a 1-5 scale using emoticons. Standardized photographs of the dorsal aspect of 17 different congenitally malformed hands and a normal hand were presented to respondents. All 18 photographs were shown twice in a random order. For intrarater reliability ICC (A,1) and for interrater reliability ICC (C,1) estimates and their 95% CI were calculated. Significance of age, gender and nationality of the respondents was assessed using Mann-Whitney U test. Hands were divided into three subgroups according to the respondent's evaluations using Latent profile analysis.
Results and Conclusions: The normal hand and clinodactyly were perceived to have the best appearance. Symbrachydactyly and radial club hand received the lowest scores. Intrarater reliability was good (ICC=0.862, 95% CI 0.859-0.865, p<0,001) and interrater was moderate (ICC=0.621, 95% CI 0.479-0.786, p<0.001). Adults rated the appearance of all hands higher than children (p<0.05 in 14/18 hands), females regarded all hands better looking than men (p<0.05 in 15/18 hands) and Europeans gave higher scores (p<0.05 in 4/18) to all hands compared to Asians, with one exception. Europeans rated four-finger hand (mean=3.21, SD=1.18) better looking than six-finger hand (mean=2.92, SD=1.18), p<0.005), whereas Asians scored six-finger hand (mean=2.66, SD=1.26) higher than four-finger hand (mean=2.51, SD=1.14). The respondents' ranking order of the hands was consistent, except in the intermediate group (Table 1 [Tab. 1]).
Despite age, gender and nationality the appearance of different congenital upper limb anomalies is rated very similarly. Asians prefer an additional digit to a four-finger hand.