gms | German Medical Science

106. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Südwestdeutscher Hals-Nasen-Ohrenärzte

20.09. - 21.09.2024, Regensburg

Evaluation of the influence of the 5 most common cholesteatoma localizations on treatment and outcomes according to EAONO/JOS classification

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author Hassan Kanso - HNO-Klinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Antoniu-Oreste Gostian - HNO-Klinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Robin Rupp - HNO-Klinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Joachim Hornung - HNO-Klinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

Vereinigung Südwestdeutscher Hals-Nasen-Ohrenärzte. 106. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Südwestdeutscher Hals-Nasen-Ohrenärzte. Regensburg, 20.-21.09.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. Doc24hnosw11

doi: 10.3205/24hnosw11, urn:nbn:de:0183-24hnosw116

Published: September 16, 2024

© 2024 Kanso et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: The EAONO/JOS staging system (EJSS) classifies cholesteatoma according to the number of sites involved, with one site leading to stage I and 2 to 5 sites leading to stage II. We tested the significance of this differentiation by analyzing the complexity of cholesteatoma involvement for the 5 most common localizations on hearing ability, surgical complexity and residual disease.

Materials and methods: Cases of acquired cholesteatoma treated at a single tertiary referral center between 2010-01-01 and 2019-07-31 were classified according to the EJSS retrospectively. The mean air–bone gap served as hearing outcome. The surgical complexity was estimated regarding the Wullstein’s tympanoplasty classification and the surgical approach.

Results: 352 ears were followed-up during the mean follow-up time of 22.94 ± 22.21 months. With 111 cases (31,5%), TAM was the most frequent localization, followed by TA (73 cases; 20,7%), A (70 cases; 19,9%), S1S2TAM (50 cases; 14,2%) and S2TAM (48 cases; 13,6%). An increase in the complexity of cholesteatoma involvement resulted in higher surgical complexity, higher frequency of second-look operations as well as poorer ABG. No difference was found for the recidivism rate, neither for residuum nor for the recurrence.

Conclusion: Considering the EJSS classification system for the five most common localizations, data showed that more complex cholesteatoma involvement influences hearing outcomes, surgical complexity and the frequency of second-look operations. The results support the need for the further refinement of the purposed differentiation in stages I and II.