gms | German Medical Science

76th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

04.05. - 08.05.2005, Erfurt

Controlled trepanation of the frontal sinus by using intraoperative navigation

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author Martin Leinung - Medical University Hannover, ENT Department, Germany
  • Timo Stöver - Medical University Hannover, ENT Department, Germany
  • Thomas Lenarz - Medical University Hannover, ENT Department, Germany
  • Omid Majdani - Medical University Hannover, ENT Department, Germany

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. 76. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V.. Erfurt, 04.-08.05.2005. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2005. Doc05hno105

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/hno2005/05hno224.shtml

Published: September 22, 2005

© 2005 Leinung et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Most of the surgical interventions of the anterior skull base can be performed via endonasal approach due to the development of endoscopic and microscopic techniques. But extensive pathologies require extranasal approaches, e.g. the bicoronal incision with good functional and cosmetic results, first published by Unterberger in 1953. The high complication rate of 18 to 33% is caused by the variable anatomy of the frontal sinuses.

Material and methods: We report on eight surgical procedures via bicoronal incision which were performed by using an intraoperative electrooptic navigation system (VectorVision², BrainLAB, Germany). Patients were seven men and one woman (mean age 54,6 ys.) with the half of them suffering from a chronic sinusitis with mucocele. Two had osteomas and two patients inverted papillomas.

The frontal sinuses were manually segmented in the preoperative dataset. An invasive skull-mounted adapter (Laterostern) attached behind the intended line of incision was used for referencing. Registration was done with the laserscanner z-touch. Intraoperatively, the borders of the frontal sinus were identified via straight pointer an marked onto the calotte with a safety margin of 2 mm. Afterwards the cap was prepared with an oscillating saw starting from a previously drilled hole of 2mm diametre. After resection of the underlying pathology the cap was reinstalled an fixed by sutures in 6 cases of osteosynthesis material in two cases.

Results: We noted no complications during these procedures, the average navigation precision was 1.4 mm as estimated by anatomical landmarks. The surgeons classified the use of the navigation system as "helpful" in three cases and "necessary" in five cases. Except for one patient all are free of relapse with a postoperative period of 9 to 23 months.

Dicussion: None of the patients showed exposition or damage of the dura or orbital structures. Sindwani et al. reported on a similar study with 15 patients and they also did not see any complications. Therefore we conclude that the use of an intraoperative navigation system is an indispensible tool in extranasal frontal sinus surgery via bicoronal incision and increases the clinical benefit for the patient.