gms | German Medical Science

65th Annual Meeting of the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS), Meeting of the Central European Network (CEN: German Region, Austro-Swiss Region and Polish Region) of the International Biometric Society (IBS)

06.09. - 09.09.2020, Berlin (online conference)

A Consistent Version of Distance Covariance for Right-Censored Survival Data and its Application in Hypothesis Testing

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Dominic Edelmann - German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 65th Annual Meeting of the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS), Meeting of the Central European Network (CEN: German Region, Austro-Swiss Region and Polish Region) of the International Biometric Society (IBS). Berlin, 06.-09.09.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2021. DocAbstr. 439

doi: 10.3205/20gmds331, urn:nbn:de:0183-20gmds3310

Published: February 26, 2021

© 2021 Edelmann.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: Distance covariance is a powerful new dependence measure that allows to detect arbitrary dependencies between random vectors. However, a consistent version of distance covariance for right-censored survival data is missing.

Methods: The concept of distance covariance is extended to measuring dependence between a covariate vector and a right-censored survival endpoint by establishing an estimator based on an inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted U-statistic. The consistency of the novel estimator is derived.

Results: In a large simulation study, it is shown that induced distance covariance permutation tests show a good performance in detecting various complex associations. Applying the distance covariance permutation tests on a gene expression dataset from breast cancer patients outlines its potential for biostatistical practice.

Conclusion: Both simulation results and a real data example demonstrate that distance covariance appears to be a very promising approach for testing associations in time-to-event data, outperforming existing methods in numerous settings.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that an ethics committee vote is not required.