gms | German Medical Science

26. Jahrestagung des Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V.

Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V. (EbM-Netzwerk)

26. - 28.03.2025, Freiburg

Assessment of decisional capacity: a review and analysis of instruments regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide

Meeting Abstract

  • author Leonie Kupsch - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Deutschland
  • author Jakov Gather - Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Bochum, Deutschland
  • author Jochen Vollmann - Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Bochum, Deutschland
  • author Stephan Nadolny - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Deutschland
  • author Jan Schildmann - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Deutschland

Die EbM der Zukunft – packen wir’s an!. 26. Jahrestagung des Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin. Freiburg, 26.-28.03.2025. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2025. Doc25ebmPS-05-09

doi: 10.3205/25ebm084, urn:nbn:de:0183-25ebm0847

Published: March 27, 2025

© 2025 Kupsch et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background/research question: Objective: Decisional capacity is an important requirement for legally justified assisted suicide in many countries. While several instruments have been developed over the past few decades to assess the capacity to consent to treatment, little is known about their applicability to assessing capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.

Methods: Methods: Review of instruments assessing decisional capacity published up to March 2024. Data concerning criteria for determining decisional capacity, psychometric properties and other aspects were extracted from all instruments included. Selected instruments were analyzed regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.

Results: Results: We identified 23 instruments assessing capacity to consent to treatment. There is considerable heterogeneity regarding the criteria utilized for assessing decisional capacity and their operationalization. Next to cognitive abilities, some instruments incorporated emotions and values. Five instruments were assessed for applicability to requests for assisted suicide. The framing of decisional capacity within the context of disease and treatment options frequently prevents application of instruments to assess decisional capacity.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Normative and empirical work is needed for developing an instrument which could be applied to assess decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.

Competing interests: Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der Autor:innen zum Thema werden durch Drittmittel gefördert.