gms | German Medical Science

26. Jahrestagung des Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V.

Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V. (EbM-Netzwerk)

26. - 28.03.2025, Freiburg

Comparative analysis of breast cancer care models and patient journeys across six european countries: implications for the Austrian healthcare system

Meeting Abstract

  • author Nicole Grössmann-Waniek - HTA Austria – Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, AIHTA, Österreich
  • author Christoph Strohmaier - HTA Austria – Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, AIHTA, Österreich
  • author Michaela Riegelnegg - HTA Austria – Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, AIHTA, Österreich

Die EbM der Zukunft – packen wir’s an!. 26. Jahrestagung des Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin. Freiburg, 26.-28.03.2025. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2025. Doc25ebmV-05-02

doi: 10.3205/25ebm024, urn:nbn:de:0183-25ebm0242

Published: March 27, 2025

© 2025 Grössmann-Waniek et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background/research question: The increasing prevalence of breast cancer in Austria is straining its hospital-centred healthcare system. This study examined breast cancer care models across six European countries to identify alternative approaches for improving resource efficiency and care delivery in Austria.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach combined a scoping review with expert consultations (n=17) across Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Belgium. The analysis mapped breast cancer patient journeys and compared health care infrastructures, service provision, and professional roles across different care settings. Data on cancer epidemiology and healthcare expenditures were collected from national and international sources.

Results: Three care models were identified: (1) Centralised Specialist Model with accredited centres and strict volume requirements (Austria, Denmark, Belgium); (2) Decentralised Model utilising certified hospitals with national quality standards (Germany); and (3) Network-based Model combining specialist centres with regional facilities (Netherlands, Sweden). While all models maintained quality through regulation and accreditation, they differed significantly in their approach to accessibility and resource allocation.

Conclusion: Findings indicate opportunities for Austria to optimise cancer care through strategic integration of centralised and network-based elements. Success factors include addressing workforce shortages, enhancing data integration, and strengthening cross-sectoral coordination. Implementing hybrid care models that combine centralised expertise with distributed service delivery could significantly improve both the efficiency and accessibility of breast cancer care in Austria's healthcare system.

Competing interests: none


References

1.
HTA Austria - Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment. Versorgung onkologischer Patient*innen am Beispiel Brustkrebs: Patient*innenpfade, Versorgungsstrukturen und Leistungserbringung in ausgewählten Europäischen Ländern. Available from: https://aihta.at/page/versorgung-onkologischer-patient-innen-am-beispiel-brustkrebs-patient-innenpfade-versorgungsstrukturen-und-leistungserbringung-in-ausgewaehlten-europaeischen-laendern/de External link