gms | German Medical Science

21. Jahrestagung des Deutschen Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V.

Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e. V.

13. - 15.02.2020, Basel, Schweiz

Development and validation of the PROPERmed instrument to identify older patients in general practice at risk of worsening of quality of life: a meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD-MA)

Meeting Abstract

  • Ana Isabel González-González - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland
  • Andreas Meid - University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Deutschland
  • Truci Sophia Nguyen - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland
  • Jeanet Wilhelmina Blom - Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden, Niederlande
  • Marjan van den Akker - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland; School of CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Niederlande
  • Petra Elders - Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Niederlande
  • Ulrich Thiem - University of Hamburg, Albertinen-Diakoniewerk, Hamburg, Deutschland
  • Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry - Faculty of Medicine – University of Freiburg, Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
  • Kym Snell - Keele University, Centre for Prognosis Research, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Großbritannien
  • Rafael Perera - Oxford University, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, Oxford, Großbritannien
  • Karin Swart - Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Niederlande
  • Henrik Rudolf - Ruhr University, AMIB, Deutschland
  • Hans-Joachim Trampisch - Ruhr University, AMIB, Deutschland
  • Joerg Meerpohl - Faculty of Medicine – University of Freiburg, Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
  • Benno Flaig - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland
  • Ghainsom Kom - Techniker Krankenkasse (TK), Deutschland
  • Walter Emil Haefeli - University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Deutschland
  • Paul Glasziou - Bond University, Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Australien
  • Ferdinand Gerlach - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland
  • Christiane Muth - Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Institute of General Practice, Deutschland

Nützliche patientenrelevante Forschung. 21. Jahrestagung des Deutschen Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin. Basel, Schweiz, 13.-15.02.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. Doc20ebmS6-V1-01

doi: 10.3205/20ebm035, urn:nbn:de:0183-20ebm0354

Published: February 12, 2020

© 2020 González-González et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background/research question: Multimorbidity and polypharmacy increase the risk for potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), underuse and worsening of health-related quality of life (wHRQoL). In heterogeneous general practice populations, it would be helpful to identify those patients at high risk of wHRQoL, since they may benefit most from resource-intensive interventions. Therefore, we developed and internal validated a prognostic model to predict wHRQoL in a six-month period in older patients in general practice with at least one chronic condition and one chronic prescription.

Methods: We harmonized IPD from five cluster-randomized trials conducted in the Netherlands and Germany. wHRQoL was defined as a decrease of EQ-5D-3L index score ≥5% from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Prognostic variables included socio-demographics, lifestyle, morbidity, medication, functional status and well-being (HRQoL, pain, depressive symptoms). Model development used logistic regression with a stratified-intercept to account for between-study heterogeneity. Prognostic variables were selected in complete cases and refitted in multiply imputed data to obtain the final model. Internal validation applied bootstrapping to assess reproducibility and internal-external cross-validation (IECV) was used to evaluate generalisability.

Results: The complete-case population consisted of 3,582 patients. In 1,046 (29%) patients, HRQoL worsened after 6-months. Predictors in the final model were related to single conditions (i.e. coronary heart disease), certain medication (i.e. drugs for acid-related disorders), PIMs (i.e. systemic corticosteroids in COPD), underuse (e.g. ACE inhibitors in heart failure), functional status and well-being, with most prognostic relevance attributable to baseline HRQoL and functional status (82%). Internal validation showed good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.71; 95%CI 0.69 to 0.72) and calibration (calibration slope: 0.97, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.39). In IECV, the final model performed well (pooled C-statistic: 0.69, 95%CI 0.68 to 0.71; calibration-in-the-large: 0, 95%CI -0.12 to 0.13).

Conclusion: This first IPD-based prognostic model for wHRQoL in older patients with chronic conditions and medication in general practice performed well in discrimination, calibration, and generalisability and may thus help to identify high-risk patients. After external validation, implementation may be supported by the relative importance of HRQoL and functional status.

Competing interests: This work was supported by the German Innovation Funds according to § 92a (2) Volume V of the Social Insurance Code (§ 92a Abs. 2, SGB V - Fünftes Buch Sozialgesetzbuch), grant number: 01VSF16018.The funder had no role in developing the protocol for this review.

Authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.