gms | German Medical Science

German Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DKOU 2024)

22. - 25.10.2024, Berlin

Minimally invasive cartilage resection of the subtalar joint is a feasible and safe technique – an anatomical study

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Sebastian Schilde - BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle, Halle, Germany
  • Dariusch Arbab - Faculty of Health Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
  • Heike Kielstein - Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
  • Natalia Gutteck - Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany

Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2024). Berlin, 22.-25.10.2024. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2024. DocAB98-2103

doi: 10.3205/24dkou596, urn:nbn:de:0183-24dkou5964

Published: October 21, 2024

© 2024 Schilde et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objectives: Subtalar arthrodesis is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of post-traumatic or primary osteoarthritis and several hindfoot deformities. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive technique for cartilage removal of the subtalar joint using a modified sinus tarsi approach.

Methods: An anatomic study was performed on 8 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric feet. A modified 2.5 cm sinus tarsi approach was used to access the subtalar joint. Cartilage removal was performed in two groups using either a 13 mm Shannon burr (GB) or a curette (GC) with subsequent systematic dissection. Standardized scaled photographs of the resected articular surfaces were analyzed in ImageJ software to quantify cartilage removal. Nearby vulnerable anatomical structures such as the intermediate and lateral dorsal cutaneous nerves, peroneal, tibialis posterior, flexor digitorum longus, and flexor hallucis longus tendons were assessed for injury.

Results and conclusion: The area of completely removed cartilage in GC was median 79.7% talar and 76.6% calcaneal. In GB, median 67.8% of the talar cartilage and 76.8% of the calcaneal cartilage was removed. The overall mean of cartilage resection was 73% (± 7.7). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Anatomical structures at risk were not inadvertently injured.

Subtalar cartilage resection can be performed safely using a minimally invasive modified sinus tarsi approach. The amount of cartilage resection is less than that reported in the literature for open cartilage resection, but may be beneficial in selected patient populations at increased risk for wound healing compromise and infection.