gms | German Medical Science

Deutscher Rheumatologiekongress 2020, 48. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), 34. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh)

09.09. - 12.09.2020, virtuell

Therapeutic potentials of bilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection in lumbar disc prolapse: a prospective study

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Ahmed Elsaman - Universität Sohag
  • Ahmed Radwan - Universität Sohag

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie. Deutscher Rheumatologiekongress 2020, 48. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), 34. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh). sine loco [digital], 09.-12.09.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocVS.05

doi: 10.3205/20dgrh192, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dgrh1922

Published: September 9, 2020

© 2020 Elsaman et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Low back pain prevalence ranges from 15-30% at a certain point of lifetime to 60-80 % in whole lifetime. It is one of the commonest health problems, and considered as the second cause of pain. Disc herniation/prolapse is a major source of low back pain. SIJ dysfunctions are common association with lumbar disc prolapse in about 2/3 of patients, especially females with recurrent pain and positive leg raising test. This concurrence is associated with more significant functional impairment [1], [2], [3].

Methods: In this study 86 Patients (57 females 29 males) with lumbar disc prolapse diagnosed by either MRI or CT were included. All of them aged > 18 years with no special condition for the duration of disc prolapse. All of them had clinical manifestations in the form of mechanical low back pain or sciatica or limited spine mobility. All participants had no or poor response to conservative treatment. Previous surgery, severe facet arthropathy, ankylosing spondylitis, sensory or motor deficit and wedge fracture were considered as exclusion criteria. Distraction, compression, thigh thrust, and sacral thrust were used to assess SIJ dysfunction only at baseline before injection. Fingertip to floor and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess mobility and function of the spine at baseline (before and after injection) and after 2 and 16 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain appraisal at the same intervals. Participants were randomly assigned into active and control group using 1:1 allocation. In the active group bilateral SIJ injection was performed under ultrasound US guidance. The patient was prone. The transducer was placed in axial position at the of sacral hiatus level. Then the sacral cornuae were detected. The transducer moved laterally to detect the lateral edge of the sacrum. The probe moved cephalad to detect the ileum. The cleft between sacrum and ilium is the sacroiliac joint [4]. The injection site was marked and 2 ml of were injected. Later, under US guidance a 22G spinal needle, where 1 mL 2 % lidocaine hydrochloride (xylocaine, AstraZeneca) mixed with triamcinolone 40 milligrams (Kenacort, Bristol Myers Squip) were injected in each SIJ [5].

Results: The mean age of the all participants was 44 years, with disease duration of around 42 months in both groups. The commonest symptom was mechanical low back pain, followed by sciatica and lastly limitation of spine mobility. SIJ involvement was detected in around 70% of the cases and 72% of the controls (Table 1). There was statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures at all follow-up time points in relation to baseline assessment. The highest was pain followed by mobility and finally ODI. The most surviving effect was mobility followed by ODI and finally pain (Table 2 [Tab. 1], Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).

Conclusion: SIJ injection is effective in improving pain, mobility and function in lumbar disc prolapse patients. Disease duration and SIJ dysfunction was not related to amelioration. Age, caudality of the disc and number of prolapsed discs were negatively related to outcome measures.

Disclosures: none


References

1.
Madani SP, Dadian M, Firouznia K, Alalawi S, Jafarian AA. Prevalence of concomitant sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with image proven herniated lumbar discs. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2009 May;23(1):23-30.
2.
Madani SP, Dadian M, Firouznia K, Alalawi S. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with herniated lumbar disc: a cross-sectional study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2013;26(3):273-9.
3.
Blaettner T, Thoden U. Schmerzen und Funktionsstörungen des Iliosakralgelenks bei Bandscheibenvorfällen der unteren Lendenwirbelsäule [Pain and functional disturbances in the sacroiliac joint in disc herniation of the lower lumbar spine]. Schmerz. 1992;6(3):192-5.
4.
Chang WH, Lew HL, Chen CP. Ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(3):278-9.
5.
Schneider BJ, Huynh L, Levin J, Rinkaekan P, Kordi R, Kennedy DJ. Does Immediate Pain Relief After an Injection into the Sacroiliac Joint with Anesthetic and Corticosteroid Predict Subsequent Pain Relief? Pain medicine (Malden, Mass). 2018;19(2):244-51.
6.
Barros G, McGrath L, Gelfenbeyn M. Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction in Patients With Low Back Pain. Federal Practitioner. 2019;36(8):370.
7.
Madani SP, Dadian M, Firouznia K, Alalawi S. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with herniated lumbar disc: a cross-sectional study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2013;26(3):273-8.
8.
Stuber KJ. Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2007;51(1):30-41.