gms | German Medical Science

42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie, 28. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie, 24. Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie

17.-20. September 2014, Düsseldorf

Attitude of doctor and patient to ankylosing spondylitis: questions of understanding

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Svetlana Lapshina - Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia
  • L. Myasoutova - Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie. Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie. 42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh); 28. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh); 24. wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie (GKJR). Düsseldorf, 17.-20.09.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. DocSP.13

doi: 10.3205/14dgrh246, urn:nbn:de:0183-14dgrh2463

Published: September 12, 2014

© 2014 Lapshina et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Background: To identify the most significant problems for AS patient about the disease in order to create a system of effective interaction: physician – AS patient .

Methods: 30 patients with confirmed AS diagnosis, the average disease duration 5, 7 ± 3,2 years, mean age 34,4 ± 12. 8 years, responded to 10 survey questions regarding their understanding of the disease and treatment issues and the impact on daily life with the need to evaluate the importance of each question on a scale from 1 to 10. Doctors rheumatologists (n = 10) and physicians (n = 20) answered the same questions from the position what they think is important for patients. Responses were ranked and compared.

Results: Considering the young age of patients, priority for patients and doctors was the outlook for the future (1). Important for doctors and patients were issues related restrictions on daily life (patients - 4 place, doctors - 2nd place) and earning capacity (patients - 3 place, doctors - 5th place) . At the same time, doctors underestimate ( 10th place ) the complexity of the patient ( 2nd place) associated with the need to exercise constantly. Physicians overestimated the importance of persistent pain for patients ( 4th place) and side effects of drugs ( 2nd place), patients put on the importance of these issues at 7 and 5th place respectively.

Conclusion: In communicating with the patient doctor needs to pay more attention to the importance of non-pharmacological treatment, in particular right physical exercises. Understanding the patients view to their condition will improve the efficiency of AS control.