gms | German Medical Science

60th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Neuropathology and Neuroanatomy (DGNN)

German Society for Neuropathology and Neuroanatomy

26. - 28.08.2015, Berlin

An additional hypothesis to the origin of perinecrotic niches in glioblastoma

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author presenting/speaker Davide Schiffer - Policlinico di Monza Foundation, Neuro-Bio-Oncology Center, Vercelli, Italy
  • Laura Annovazzi - Policlinico di Monza Foundation, Neuro-Bio-Oncology Center, Vercelli, Italy
  • Marta Mellai - Policlinico di Monza Foundation, Neuro-Bio-Oncology Center, Vercelli, Italy
  • Marta Mazzucco - Policlinico di Monza Foundation, Neuro-Bio-Oncology Center, Vercelli, Italy

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neuropathologie und Neuroanatomie. 60th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Neuropathology and Neuroanatomy (DGNN). Berlin, 26.-28.08.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. Doc15dgnnP54

doi: 10.3205/15dgnn78, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnn780

Published: August 25, 2015

© 2015 Schiffer et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Microenvironment exerts its effects at the most on perivascular and perinecrotic niches where glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) are believed to be located in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The histological definition of the niches is not univocal. The perinecrotic ones develop around circumscribed necroses that originate from hypoxia and GSCs from the activation of HIF-1/2.

Objectives: An alternative interpretation to the occurrence of GSCs in perinecrotic position is that they represent the residue of GSCs which populated the hyperproliferating area where necrosis develops surviving it.

Materials and Methods: In a series of 20 GBMs the proliferating zones were studied histologically, immunohistochemically and by immunofluorescence by stemness (Nestin, SOX2, REST, CD133, Musashi.1 and Oct4) and differentiation (GFAP, βIII-tubulin, GalC) antigens and by HIF-1/2.

Results: Hyperproliferating areas are rich in stemness and poor in differentiations antigens. With the development of necrosis, due to the imbalance between the proliferation capacity of tumor and endothelial cells, this appears as surrounded by HIF-1-, Nestin- and SOX2-positive cells.

Conclusion: This is an alternative interpretation to the generally accepted perinecrotic niche formation in GBMs. It is based on the understanding of GSCs as a functional status due to the acquisition of stemness properties by the dedifferentiation of the most malignant tumor cells.