gms | German Medical Science

73. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Griechischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

29.05. - 01.06.2022, Köln

Clinical outcome after surgical treatment of traumatic peroneal nerve injury – single centre experience in 93 cases over the last 10 years

Klinisches Outcome nach Operation traumatischer Läsionen des Nervus peroneus: eine monozentrische Analyse von 93 Fällen der letzten 10 Jahre

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Daniel Nicholas Werkmann - Universitätsklinik Ulm am Standort Günzburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Günzburg, Deutschland
  • Andreas Knoll - Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Ulm, Deutschland
  • Maria Teresa Pedro - Universitätsklinik Ulm am Standort Günzburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Günzburg, Deutschland
  • Gregor Antoniadis - Universitätsklinik Ulm am Standort Günzburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Günzburg, Deutschland
  • Christian Rainer Wirtz - Universitätsklinik Ulm am Standort Günzburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Günzburg, Deutschland; Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Ulm, Deutschland
  • Andrej Pala - Universitätsklinik Ulm am Standort Günzburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Günzburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 73. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), Joint Meeting mit der Griechischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Köln, 29.05.-01.06.2022. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2022. DocP034

doi: 10.3205/22dgnc348, urn:nbn:de:0183-22dgnc3484

Published: May 25, 2022

© 2022 Werkmann et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Peroneal nerve injuries and their treatment are considered to be associated with bad clinical outcome. This study aims to analyze suspected risk factors which may influence the clinical outcome after surgical treatment of traumatic peroneal nerve lesions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with traumatic peroneal nerve injury treated by decompression, split repair or nerve grafting between 2010 and 2020. By using the motor function grading scale of the British Medical Research Council (MRC) pre- and postoperatively, the motor function of the peroneal nerve was evaluated and additionally, sensory deficits and pain within the innervation zone, as well as assumed risk factors favoring bad outcome were assessed. The follow up intervals were set at up to 6-month, 1-year and 2-years after surgery.

Results: In total, 93 patients were included in the present study work, 42 (45,16%) received decompression, 15 (16,13%) were treated by split repair and 36 (38,71%) needed autologous nerve grafting. The median time between trauma and nerve repair at our department were 4 months. The median muscle strength before surgery were M0 at all muscles innervated by the peroneal nerve, focusing on the anterior tibial muscle (ATM). Up to 1 year after surgery weakness of the ATM improved to the median of M3. After nerve decompression an improvement of 2 grades was found in 24 cases (57,14%) and 3 grades in 17 cases (40,48%), after split repair improvement of 1 grade was noted in 5 cases (33,33%) and 2 grades in 3 cases (20%), after nerve grafting we found improvement of 1 grade in 13 cases (36,11%) and 2 grades in 5 cases (13,89%). Patients with sensory disturbances improved in 47,27% 1 year after surgery. Pain relief was achieved in 7 cases (41,18%). We found no significant association between age, BMI, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension and the postoperative outcome. The defect > 6cm was significantly more often associated with worse ATM improvement (p=0.04, OR 5.6).

Conclusion: According to the present data, a high number of patients achieved functional improvement after surgical treatment of traumatic peroneal nerve lesion. Even after peroneal reconstruction surgery more than 36% improved after 12 months, so that this procedure should be considered as an important treatment step in selected cases. Further studies are needed to identify potential risk factors in more details.