Article
Clinical determinants impacting overall survival of patients with operable brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer
Klinische Faktoren, die das Gesamtüberleben von Patienten mit operablen Hirnmetastasen bei nicht-kleinzelligem Lungenkrebs beeinflussen
Search Medline for
Authors
Published: | May 25, 2022 |
---|
Outline
Text
Objective: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently the leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide and is accompanied by a continuously increasing incidence of brain metastases (BM). The recent improvements of systemic treatment in NSCLC necessitates continuous updates on prognostic subgroups and overall survival curves. In order to improve clinical decision making in tumor boards, we investigated the clinical determinants affecting survival in patients with resectable NSCLC BM.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of NSCLC patients with surgically resected BM treated in our institution between 01/2015 und 12/2020. Relevant clinical factors affecting survival were identified by univariate analysis and included in a multivariate cox regression model. The study was approved by the ethic committee (PV4904).
Results: Overall, 264 patients were identified, with a mean age of 62.39 ±9.98 years at initial diagnosis of NSCLC BM. Factors that significantly affected overall survival included the systemic metastatic load at time of initial diagnosis of BM (mean: 45.9 ±9.7 vs. 58.9 ±9.4 months, p = 0.021) as well as number of BM <2 (mean: 25.5 ±4.4 vs. 57.4 ±7.8 months, p = 0.014). We adjusted for survival time after neurosurgical intervention and found significant survival benefits in patients <60 years (32.5 ±4.3 vs. 28.5 ±5.2 months, p = 0.036) and patients without any concurrent systemic metastases at time of NSCLC BM diagnosis (mean 32.4 vs. 34.1, p = 0.032). Our data shows that number of BM (singular/solitary), gender and age, but not location (infra-/supratentorial), mass-edema index and time to BM occurrence seem to impact overall survival in NSCLC BM patients.
Conclusion: Our study shows that patients in prognostically favorable clinical subgroups have an overall survival which differs significantly from the current state of literature and strongly supports the positive impact of surgical intervention. These clinically relevant factors may improve the understanding of the risks, the course of this disease and hopefully impact future clinical decision making in tumor boards.