gms | German Medical Science

71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

21.06. - 24.06.2020

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of temozolomide resistant GBM stem cells and recurrent GBM reveals carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA-2) as a major resistance factor

Die vergleichende Transkriptom-Analyse von temozolomid-resistenten GBM-Stammzellen und GBM-Rezidiven offenbart Carbonic Anhydrase 2 (CA-2) als vorrangigen Resistenz-Faktor

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Jörg-Walter Bartsch - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Marburg, Deutschland
  • Kai Zhao - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Marburg, Deutschland
  • Ricarda Hannen - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Marburg, Deutschland
  • Barbara Carl - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Marburg, Deutschland
  • Axel Pagenstecher - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Neuropathologie, Marburg, Deutschland
  • Christopher Nimsky - Philipps-Universität Marburg, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Marburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. sine loco [digital], 21.-24.06.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocP149

doi: 10.3205/20dgnc433, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dgnc4334

Published: June 26, 2020

© 2020 Bartsch et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: About 95 % of GBM patients show tumor relapse leaving them with limited therapeutic options as recurrent tumors are often resistant to temozolomide (TMZ). GBM-like stem cells (GSCs) are considered to be the major obstacle in therapy resistance, so that characterization of their response to TMZ is helpful in identifying genes associated with TMZ resistance.

Methods: GSCs were isolated from GBM patients (n=5) and characterized by IF-staining for GFAP and Nestin. GSCs from 3 different GBM patients were continuously exposed to TMZ treatment similar to patient treatment intervals (10 mM, 5 out of 7 days) over a period of 20 weeks. Dose-response curves were generated to determine IC50 values for TMZ. RNAs from resistant cell clones were subjected to RNA sequencing. Expression changes of candidate genes were analyzed by qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry in resistant GSCs and in matched patient samples (GBM vs. recurrent GBM).

Results: RNA sequencing analysis revealed 49 genes dysregulated in TMZ resistant cell clones. By qPCR analyses of the most prominent 10 genes (up- or downregulated), we found that only the gene encoding for Carbonic Anhydrase 2 (CA-2) was consistently upregulated in all GSCs cell clones and in recurrent GBM vs. GBM. Further analyses confirmed a strong expression of CA-2 in GBM tissue and in GSCs. No expression of CA-2 was observed in differentiated patient-derived GBM cell lines. This also applies for other CAs identified in GBM such as CA-9 and CA-12. Furthermore, we used an inhibitor for Carbonic Anhydrases, Acetazolamide (ACZ) in conjunction with TMZ and observed a significant sensitization of GSCs (p<0.01) for TMZ in all GSCs cell lines tested.

Conclusion: To minimize the occurrence of GBM recurrence, it is essential to eliminate GSCs, which are particularly resistant to standard therapy. Here we provide a rationale for a specific and potent inhibition of Carbonic Anhydrase 2 as a means to optimize the existing chemotherapy of GBM.