gms | German Medical Science

71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

21.06. - 24.06.2020

RNA-sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to pre-assess sensitivity to chemotherapeutics in GBM

RNA-Sequenzierung und bioinformatische Analysen zur Vorbeurteilung der Chemotherapie-Sensitivität beim GBM

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Sven R. Kantelhardt - Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Neurochirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Darius Kalasauskas - Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Neurochirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Bettina Sprang - Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Neurochirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Florian Ringel - Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Neurochirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Sven-Ernoe Bikar - StarSEQ GmbH, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Nicole Naumann - StarSEQ GmbH, Mainz, Deutschland
  • Maksim Sorokin - Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, Moskau, Russian Federation
  • Anton Buzdin - Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, Moskau, Russian Federation
  • Alf Giese - OrthoCentrum, Hamburg, Deutschland
  • Ella Kim - Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Neurochirurgie, Mainz, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. sine loco [digital], 21.-24.06.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocV277

doi: 10.3205/20dgnc273, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dgnc2734

Published: June 26, 2020

© 2020 Kantelhardt et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Development of a molecular guided approach for individualized selection of chemotherapeutics in (recurrent) GBM. In this EU-funded project high-throughput RNA sequencing and bioinformatics were utilized to quantitatively analyze activities of oncopathways involved in response to FDA-approved chemotherapeutics.

Methods: Biopsy material from primary and recurrent GBM was used for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and establishing primary cultures of glioma stem cells (GSCs), which were then examined in the same way. RNA-seq data were subjected to analyses of differential gene expression (DE) and quantitative pathway activation analysis using Oncobox – an original bioinformatic tool developed at Oncobox (http://www.oncobox.com/). Results for primary and recurrent GBM were compared. Oncobox analysis was further used to model the efficacy of 130 FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs.

Results: 128 tissue samples and 42 GSC cultures from 44 GBMs were analyzed. 23 primary GBM, 19 recurrent cases and 2 secondary recurrent GBMs were included. In 14 cases matching pairs of primary and recurrent GBM could be obtained. DE analysis revealed a high degree of concordance between tumor tissues and GSCs in the longitudinal transcriptomic changes associated with tumor recurrence. Oncobox analysis showed downregulation of key pathways involved in the regulation of DNA repair and upregulation of immune pathways in recurrent GBM compared to the corresponding primary tumors. When specifically looking at pathways involved in response to chemotherapeutics we found a downregulation of pathways targeted by Temozolomide and Lomustine in recurrent GBM. In contrast, several pathways showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in their activities in the setting of recurrence. Interestingly, among the upregulated pathways those targeted by chemotherapeutics currently investigated in phase II or III trials on GBM (Durvalumab or Pomalidomide) were also found upregulated in recurrent tumors.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the spectrum of potentially effective drugs may differ between newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastomas and provides a transcriptional rationale for the lack of significant therapeutic benefit from temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The approach carries the potential of predicting sensitivity to specific chemotherapeutics and might be used for individual optimization of treatment regimes.