gms | German Medical Science

71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

21.06. - 24.06.2020

Perioperative anticoagulation in patients with intracranial meningioma – no increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage?

Perioperative Antikoagulation bei Patienten mit intrakraniellen Meningeomen – kein erhöhtes Risiko intrakranieller Hämorrhagie?

Meeting Abstract

  • presenting/speaker Florian Wilhelmy - Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Annika Hantsche - Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland
  • Jürgen Meixensberger - Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Leipzig, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 71. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 9. Joint Meeting mit der Japanischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. sine loco [digital], 21.-24.06.2020. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2020. DocV245

doi: 10.3205/20dgnc239, urn:nbn:de:0183-20dgnc2391

Published: June 26, 2020

© 2020 Wilhelmy et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: Anticoagulation (AC) is a critical topic in perioperative and post-bleeding management. Yet, there is a lack of data for a safe and reasonable use of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in regard of risk factors, cause and modality of brain tissue damage as well as for unfavorable outcomes, such as postoperative hemorrhage (PH) and thromboembolic events (TEE) in neurosurgical patients. In this paper we present retrospective data on perioperative anticoagulation in meningioma surgery.

Methods: Patient data of 286 individuals undergoing meningioma surgery between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. We followed up on anticoagulation management, doses and time points of first application, laboratory values and adverse events like PH or TEE. Preexisting medication and hemostatic conditions were evaluated. Time course of patients measured as overall survival,re-admission for 30 days after surgery as well as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate regression.

Results: We carried out AC with Fraxiparin and, since 2015, Tinzaparin in weight-adapted recommended prophylactic doses. Delayed (216 ± 228 h) AC was associated with a significantly increased rate of thromboembolic events (p= 0.026). Early (29 ± 21.9 h) prophylactic AC, on the other hand, did not increase the risk of PH. We identified additional risk factors for PH, such as blood pressure maxima, steroid treatment and increased white blood cell count. Patients’ outcome was affected more adversely by TEE than PH (+3 points in modified rankin scale in TEE vs. +1 point in PH, p=0,001).

Conclusion: Early prophylactic AC is not associated with an increased rate of PH. The risks of TEE seem to outweigh those of PH. Early postoperative prophylactic AC in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection should be considered.

Table 1 [Tab. 1]

Table 2 [Tab. 2]