gms | German Medical Science

69. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Joint Meeting mit der Mexikanischen und Kolumbianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

03.06. - 06.06.2018, Münster

The influence of shunt valve adjustments on the intracranial pressure and clinical outcome

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Fritz Teping - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Deutschland
  • Sebastian Antes - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Deutschland
  • Joachim Oertel - Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 69. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), Joint Meeting mit der Mexikanischen und Kolumbianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Münster, 03.-06.06.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. DocP030

doi: 10.3205/18dgnc371, urn:nbn:de:0183-18dgnc3713

Published: June 18, 2018

© 2018 Teping et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Objective: ICP-guided valve adjustments are considered to be a promising therapy option in symptomatic shunt-treated patients. In this series, a shunt-integrated telemetric device was applied to objectify drainage-related problems and the influence of valve adjustments on the ICP and the clinical outcome.

Methods: Twenty-five patients with suboptimal shunt valve settings and drainage-related problems underwent insertion of telemetric ICP measurements (in average 7.3 measurements per patient) and consecutive valve adjustments (in average 3.4 adjustments per patient) were carried out. The relations between ICP, valve adjustment and the clinical outcome were statistically analyzed.

Results: In this series, 18 out of 25 patients benefited from ICP-guided valve adjustments. Clinical improvement was attributed to significant changes of the valve settings and the intracranial pressure. Therapeutic normalization of ICP was not automatically associated with clinical improvement. Valve settings determined ICP, but there was no direct correlation between pressure settings and ICP.

Conclusion: Telemetric intracranial pressure measurements in shunt-treated patients can be very helpful. Successful therapy of drainage-related problems is based on significant changes of the valve settings and the ICP.